Aggregatore notizie

Porti & ambiente — le notizie raccolte

Aria, clima, elettrificazione, acque e biodiversità. 6117 articoli raccolti da fonti istituzionali e specializzate, classificati per area ambientale e linkati al porto di riferimento.

Articoli per area ambientale
reset
La fiscal que investigó la muerte de Nisman pidió que la sobresean de la acusación de encubrimiento
📰 La Nacion 📅 2026-05-04 es
Se trata de Fabiana Fein, que está jubilada; la acusan de no preservar la escena del crimen en el departamento de Puerto Madero en 2015
→ Apri originale
Finlandia: SRV y Balder construirán nueva sede de Meyer Turku
📰 Portal Portuario Media 📅 2026-05-04 es
Por Redacción PortalPortuario @PortalPortuario La empresa finlandesa de desarrollo e innovación en el sector de la construcción SRV y la La entrada Finlandia: SRV y Balder construirán nueva sede de Meyer Turku se publicó primero en PortalPortuario .
→ Apri originale
Estados Unidos evacúa a Pakistán a 22 tripulantes del portacontenedores con bandera iraní Touska
📰 Portal Portuario Media 📅 2026-05-04 es
Por Redacción PortalPortuario/Agencia Reuters @PortalPortuario Estados Unidos evacuó hacia Pakistán a 22 miembros de la tripulación que permanecían retenidos a La entrada Estados Unidos evacúa a Pakistán a 22 tripulantes del portacontenedores con bandera iraní Touska se publicó primero en PortalPortuario .
→ Apri originale
Puerto Valparaíso, TPS y TPV lanzan segundo operativo de limpieza en Barrio Puerto
📰 Portal Portuario Media 📅 2026-05-04 es
Por PortalPortuario Social Este lunes, en la Plaza Echaurren de Valparaíso, se dio inicio a la segunda versión del programa La entrada Puerto Valparaíso, TPS y TPV lanzan segundo operativo de limpieza en Barrio Puerto se publicó primero en PortalPortuario .
→ Apri originale
La sorprendente misión de Carla y Guillermina Royo-Villanova en el Amazonas: continuar el legado de su padre y salvar a los jíbaros
📰 Hola 📅 2026-05-04 es
La princesa de Panagyúrishte y su hermana se unen a la lucha de Jaime Royo-Villanova y Payá, que lleva 50 años en la selva, y acaba de publicar 'Viviendo el Amazonas'
Hay historias que requieren casi una vida entera. La deJaime Royo-Villanova y Payáes una de ellas: más de cincuenta años viajando de forma ininterrumpida a laAmazonía peruana,conviviendo concomunidades indígenasy construyendo un vínculo que ha dado lugar a su sexto libro, publicado por la editorial4 Palos.Viviendo el Amazonasno es solo el relato de una aventura. Es, sobre todo, la historia de un compromiso. Durante décadas, Royo-Villanova ha trabajado codo con codo con misioneros jesuitas y comunidades como los aguaruna y huambisa, contribuyendo a proyectos educativos y agrícolas que buscaban mejorar las condiciones de vida sin alterar la esencia de estos pueblos. Una labor silenciosa, sostenida en el tiempo,que abrazan también sus hijas, Carla y Guillermina. Laprincesa de Panagyúrishte recogió su testigo en el propio Amazonas, donde fue la protagonista de un viaje trepidante; y organizó una segunda presentación del libro en su casa de Madrid, tras darse a conocer la obra en la Cámara de Oficiales de la Armada. YGuillermina, pintora afincada en el Puerto de Santa María, también se ha unido a este último proyecto familiar comoilustradora de los animales de la selva-23 en total- que aparecen en el libro. “Tuve la necesidad de vivir lasaventuras de mi padrey quizá de coger su testigo”, explica Carla. Desde niña había escuchado historias de la selva, de sus gentes, de un mundo completamente distinto al suyo. Durante años, aquel universo fue imaginado… hasta que, hace unos años,decidió formar parte de él. "Compartir vida con los jíbaros ha sido una de las mayores enseñanzas que la vida me ha dado" (Carla) Como hija del Múun Pámuk Jaime, elúnico hombre no jibaro nombrado Pamukpor el Consejo Permanente Aguaruna-Huambisa- generé mucha expectación”, recuerda Carla. “Pensarían queno aguantaría más de dos días”. Sin embargo, lo que encontraron fue a alguien dispuesto a integrarse, a observar y, sobre todo, a aprender. “Encontraron a una amiga para siempre”. El viaje no estuvo exento de riesgo. Cruzó dos veces el Pongo de Manseriche, conocido como “el que espanta”, uno de los pasos más peligrosos de la selva amazónica, bajo una lluvia torrencial. “Perono sentí miedo.Si vas con un jíbaro al lado no tienes ningún problema”, asegura. Más allá de la aventura, lo que vivió fue unaexperiencia profundamente transformadora. “Compartir vida con los jíbaros ha sido una de las mayores enseñanzas que la vida me ha dado”, afirma. Durante su estancia, convivió con comunidades que, pese a las dificultades —falta de infraestructuras, acceso limitado a sanidad o educación—, defienden su territorio y su forma de vida frente a las amenazas externas: explotación de recursos, contaminación y pérdida progresiva de su entorno. El libro de su padre, Jaime Royo-Villanova y Payá, recoge esa realidad. A lo largo de sus páginas,describe a los jíbaros como una sociedad profundamente espiritual,ligada a la naturaleza y con una organización social basada más en el consenso que en la jerarquía. “Son diferentes en lo superficial, pero similares en lo esencial”, señala. Comparten valores universales: el amor a la familia, el deseo de progreso, la defensa de su entorno… Y solo reducen las cabezas de otros jíbaros. Cuantas más cabezas lleves colgando mejor guerrero eres”. Para ellos,la Amazonía no es un territorio que habitan, sino una entidad viva de la que forman parte. La conocen, la respetan y la protegen. Una idea que contrasta con la visión externa que, durante siglos, ha considerado la selva como un espacio para ser explotado. Carla lo vivió en primera persona. “Creemos que tienen carencias, pero ellos me hacían ver lo equivocados que estamos”, explica. Lo que encontró no fue pobreza en el sentido occidental, sinootra forma de riqueza:la de una vida conectada con la naturaleza, con la comunidad y conuna espiritualidad constante. También descubrió una realidad compleja. Los jíbaros son conocidos históricamente como guerreros, pero esa es solo una parte de su identidad. “Son hospitalarios, inteligentes, con una cultura deslumbrante”, apunta su padre en el libro. Unpueblo que ha resistido invasiones a lo largo de los siglosy que hoy sigue luchando por mantener su territorio y su modo de vida. Para Carla, la experiencia supuso algo más que un viaje. Fue una toma de conciencia. “Su lucha pasó a ser también la mía”, afirma. Desde entonces, su mirada ha cambiado para ser puente entre dos realidades que rara vez se encuentran. El legado de Jaime Royo-Villanova no es solo el de sus libros, sino el de una vida dedicada a entender, acompañar y apoyar. Un legado que ahora empieza a tomar una nueva forma a través de sus hijas.
→ Apri originale
‘More powerful and versatile than any other personal fan I’ve tested’ — I reviewed Shark’s 3-in-1 portable fan and have never experienced so many different kinds of cooling
📰 TechRadar 📅 2026-05-04 en
The Shark ChillPill is a portable cooling system that's essential for summer, travel, migraines, menopause and anyone else who gets too hot.
The Shark ChillPill is a fan, cooling plate and mister all in one colorful, portable and flexible design. It charges via USB-C with an all-day battery life, has a sturdy but versatile build, straightforward controls and you can add extra attachments to make it even more practical. The only catch is the price is high as far as portable fans go. But I think if your budget can stretch and you struggle in the heat it's worth it, because it's so much more than a run-of-the-mill fan. Different cooling options + Good battery life Quality build and design Quite expensive Additional attachments cost extra Not portable enough for a pocket Why you can trust TechRadarWe spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you're buying the best.Find out more about how we test. TheSharkChillPill is a personal cooling system, which means you can use it as a fan, a cooling plate you can press against your skin or a mister. Portable fans have always been around, but I’ve not seen anything else that combines these three functions into one device that manages to look stylish and cute while doing it. Trust Shark to pull it off. The brand many readers will know for their vacuum cleaners and hair-styling products has a habit of combining solid tech, thoughtful design and straightforward controls, and I’m happy to report the ChillPill is no different. The only catch is the price. It’s expensive for a portable fan at $149.99/£129.99. But as I’ll get into below, it’s so much more than that and if you really feel the heat, well worth the price. If you’ve ever held a compact pair of travel binoculars, you’ll already have a good mental image of the Shark ChillPill. It’s made up of two cylinders connected by a hinge in the middle. The larger cylinder is lighter and houses the fan, that’s where you attach the different heads. The smaller one holds the battery, controls and a small screen, and it made the most sense for me to use that one as the handle. At 45 X 84 X 112mm and 350g, it’s compact enough to carry in most bags but not small enough to slip into a pocket. So manage your expectations if you were hoping for something as tiny and light as a regular cheap travel fan. This has considerably more tech inside it, and you can feel that. The hinge in the middle makes it really versatile. If you lay the cylinders flat and parallel, it’s a handheld fan. But twist it so they’re perpendicular and it’ll stand on a desk or any surface, directing air exactly where you want it. I used it this way a lot while working, and it’s a great setup for that. It comes with a small cloth carry case. I’ve seen other reviews describe this as fitting the ChillPill itself, but I’d say it’s a squeeze and doesn’t fully cover the top. Best to use that as storage for the spare attachments instead. Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more. There are some genuinely lovely color options here, each with a darker color for the fan cylinder and a lighter one for the battery cylinder. There’s Carbon (black), Glacier (turquoise), Haze (dark blue), Dragon Fruit (pink), Match (green), and Iced Latte, a pale brown and beige with a slightly shiny finish, which is the one I tested. My personal favorite of the range is Glacier. Controls are really straightforward. The smaller cylinder has a dial at the top with textured edges that you turn to move the fan through the ten speeds, and a small screen that shows speed and battery level. It also displays a little icon depending on which attachment you’ve fitted. There’s a fan, a water drop for the misting pod then a little snowflake for the cooling plate. Press the screen down to turn it on and long press to turn it off. There’s also a lock and unlock switch on the side to stop it accidentally activating in your bag, which is necessary as I did turn it on a couple of times without meaning to before I got into the habit of locking it. Charging is via a USB-C port on the base of the smaller cylinder, tucked under a sealed flap. A green icon flashes when it’s charging and you can use the fan while it charges, though not the cooling plate. The three attachments twist into place really easily. In fact, there’s an overall high build quality to the whole thing, which makes it feel really satisfying to use and hold. Beyond the three included attachments, Shark also sells additional accessories. There’s a crossbody strap, a wrist strap, clip, clamp and sleeve. These are all sold separately, which is worth knowing — there's no strap included as there is with some rivals, like theDysonHushJet Mini Cool Fan. That said, they’re not expensive and could be really invaluable to buy along with the fan from the get go, as it will allow you to attach it to a pram, desk or use it hands-free on the move. If I was taking it on holiday, I’d snap up the crossbody strap in a heartbeat. The ChillPill is genuinely powerful, more so than any other personal fan I’ve tested. At mid-range settings — around 4 or 5 — it’ll cool you down effectively without blasting you in the face or hurting your eyes. Especially if it’s propped up on a desk nearby, which is how I used it the most during the day while I was working. Settings 9 and 10 get considerably more powerful and are for when you really need it, either to cool down quicker or outdoors in more serious heat. I’ve seen other reviews flag the ChillPill as very loud, and I’m going to respectfully push back on that with my measurements — I clocked it at 43.4dB at speed 1, 59.5dB at speed 5, 66.5dB at speed 8, and 70.5dB at speed 10. For context, my high-tech kettle just before it finishes boiling is 69dB and my hairdryer is 78dB. So yes, it gets louder as you turn it up — that’s true of every fan — but calling it really loud at speed 10 is a stretch. I also used it at night on setting 5 and the sound (which I’m guessing is akin to white or green noise) helped me sleep. Battery life was impressive for such a small device. I ran a test with the fan at speed 5, which is the sweet spot I’d realistically use it at on a desk all day, and it lasted for 8 hours and 10 minutes. Now Shark claims 11 hours at the lower settings, so this is a welcome surprise. The misting pod works by filling a small tank with water, which then soaks the wick inside the attachment. There’s a wick pre-installed that Shark recommends you replace monthly and three spares in the box. Getting the old one out is fairly easy with either your fingertips or a pair of tweezers. Once it’s set up, there’s a small opening at the top and then you can choose between constant or interval misting modes. I found the mist to be fine enough that it won’t soak you or anything around you, which means you can use it indoors or on public transport if you’re mindful about it but I probably wouldn’t use it directly over electronics. The attachment I was least sure about before testing it was the cooling plate, which Shark calls InstaChill. And yet it was the one I ended up loving the most. Using the fan behind the metal plate to cool it down, the InstaChill allows you to gain targeted relief by pressing it against your skin. It’s very cold, like touching an ice pack fresh from the freezer. I used it on my wrists and the back of my neck and it had an instant cooling and calming effect. Although this is probably a subjective experience, I’m always a little too warm and using this on the pressure points on my neck didn’t just cool me down but made a real difference for focus, alertness, and heading off a migraine. Based on my battery testing, the cooling plate lasts 1 hour and 40 minutes before you run out of juice. That might not sound like much, but it's doing serious work to cool the plate down to ice-pack levels of cold. I also don't think anyone would realistically be using that attachment continuously. I run hot and even I found 30 seconds on my skin was enough before it got too intense. In practice, you're more likely to use the fan, switch to the plate for a minute or two on the pulse point, then switch back. For that kind of use, 1 hour and 40 minutes goes a long way. I think the Shark ChillPill makes the most sense for anyone who really feels the heat, if you’re traveling to a warmer climate or work in offices with no upper temperature limit (yes that’s a real thing in the UK, there’s a legal lower limit but not an upper one). It'd also be a great fit if you're dealing with perimenopause or menopause symptoms or suffer from migraines and would benefit from the cooling plate’s targeted effect on pulse points. But really it'll be good for everyone else as the summer heat hits. The only notable downside to the ChillPill is that it’s expensive for a portable fan at $149.99 / £129.99. But it’s three cooling tools in one well-built and thoughtfully designed device that happens to be small enough to carry anywhere. That said, it's only really good value if you genuinely plan to use all three of those attachments and if you have enough budget left over to buy an accessory, like the crossbody strap. If you just want a fan, there are cheaper options, including the Dyson HushJet Mini Cool. Expect to see more premium portable fans entering this space. The era of tiny, underpowered travel fans that just seem to move hot air around seem to be giving way to solutions that are more effective and considered, and the ChillPill is currently leading that charge. The Shark ChillPill was released in March 2026, priced at $149.99 / £129.99. It's available in Europe and North America at the time of writing. For a portable fan, this is expensive. It’s worth being honest about that. You can pick up another portable fan, like the JISULIFE Portable Handheld Fan for $73.49 / £69.99. But the ChillPill isn’t really a portable fan, it’s three cooling tools rolled into one, which makes direct price comparisons tricky. There’s nothing else on the market right now that does exactly the same thing. The closest rival is the Dyson HushJet Mini at $99.99 / £99.99, which launched in April 2026. It's fan only — so doesn't include misting or a cooling plate — but it is well-engineered, quiet and around $30 / £30 cheaper. So if all you want is a powerful, stylish portable fan then it’s a strong alternative. If you want the full cooling system, it isn’t. Beyond that, if you want a fairly small desktop fan for working or at home that you don’t need to be portable, there are some good alternatives to consider. Like theShark FlexBreeze HydroGo, a desktop fan also from Shark with the same misting technology at $149.99 / £129.99. Or theMeacoFan Sefte 8inat £79.99, a great desktop fan for working and sleeping, which we rated for its ability to blast out impressively strong airflow at a pleasingly low volume. For now, the ChillPill remains the most versatile product in this space. All in all, it’s expensive. But if you’ll genuinely use all three attachments, it’s good value. The people who’ll get the most out of it, like those who can’t sleep in the heat, commuters, anyone dealing with menopause or migraines, will likely find the price very easy to justify. Weight 350g / 0.7lbs Dimensions 45mm x 841mm x 112mm (L x W x D) Colors Carbon, Glacier, Haze, Dragon Fruit, Matcha, Iced Latte Battery life Up to 11 hours Attribute Notes Score Features With three modes and a screen, features are simple and work well. Battery life is impressive and extra attachments are handy — though you'll need to pay more for them. 4/5 Performance Works well in all sorts of environments with plenty of power and longevity. The fan is excellent (if a little loud at the highest settings) and the cooling plate and mister give a much welcome alternative way to cool down. 5/5 Design It looks cool, is exceptionally well built and can be used in a few different ways. It's compact, fairly light and gets bonus points for all the vivid color options. 5/5 Value It's expensive. There's no getting around that. But I think for many people that price is absolutely worth it and you're getting a top-performing and well-built device. 4/5 You struggle in the heatWhether that’s migraines, perimenopause or menopause, travel to a hot climate, camping or any other reason the heat is difficult, this was made for you. Standard portable fans have never quite cut itIt’s more powerful and versatile than anything most people will have tried, especially in such a compact package. You appreciate good design—and don’t mind paying for itYou do need to spend a bit here, but you get a genuinely fantastic product for your money. You need something truly pocket-sizedIt’s compact but not slip-it-in-your-pocket compact. You’ll need to look elsewhere and accept something considerably less powerful. You’re on a tight budgetThe price is the only real downside here. If spending over $100/£100 just isn’t feasible right now that’s completely understandable. You only want a straightforward fanIt’s excellent as a fan alone, but it makes the most sense if the misting head and cooling plate appeal to you at least some of the time. Dyson HushJet Mini Cooling FanIf you want something from a brand with serious experience in this space, Dyson’s latest personal fan is well worth considering. It’s lighter and more stripped back than the ChillPill, without the same 3-in-1 versatility, but Dyson really know what they’re doing when it comes to airflow. We haven’t tested it yet, but our full review is coming very soon. Shark FlexBreeze HydroGoIf the Shark ChillPill appeals because you want to cool down at home or as you work, then the Shark FlexBreeze HydroGo is a tabletop fan that's worth a look. It also has a misting feature we loved during testing. It's small for a fan but not as portable as the ChillPill. If you don’t see a need for something small you can use on-the-go, stay with Shark just consider the FlexBreeze HydroGo instead. Read ourShark FlexBreeze HydroGo review I tested the Shark ChillPill for a whole week during a surprisingly warm spell in the UK, which meant I could put it through its paces properly. I used it while working at home on warm days, remote working in coffee shops, on a walk in the countryside and having a picnic in the park, all when temperatures were high in the UK. I also used it at night to see how both the cooling effect of the fan and the sound it makes impacted my sleep. This week-long testing time gave me a good opportunity to run the battery down across a range of settings and properly test the longevity. I’ve been writing about and testing tech for more than 15 years, covering health tech, smart home devices, wearables and audio products. Always with a focus on whether a device can actually make your life better, rather than what’s on the spec sheet. Becca is a contributor to TechRadar, a freelance journalist and author. She’s been writing about consumer tech and popular science for more than ten years, covering all kinds of topics, including why robots have eyes and whether we’ll experience the overview effect one day. She’s particularly interested in VR/AR, wearables, digital health, space tech and chatting to experts and academics about the future. She’s contributed to TechRadar, T3, Wired, New Scientist, The Guardian, Inverse and many more. Her first book, Screen Time, came out in January 2021 with Bonnier Books. She loves science-fiction, brutalist architecture, and spending too much time floating through space in virtual reality. You must confirm your public display name before commenting Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
→ Apri originale
California lectures America about ‘sustainability’ — while running out of gas
📰 New York Post 📅 2026-05-04 en
The last oil tanker carrying crude from the Persian Gulf (Iraq) is unloading in Long Beach, California. This effectively marks the end of Middle East oil imports to the state, at least for now.
→ Apri originale
Agustín Zulueta: «Hemos llegado a un equilibrio: no se trata de crecer, sino de mantener la excelencia»
📰 Www.abc.es 📅 2026-05-04 es
Puerto Portals acogerá el inicio de la 15ª temporada de 52 Super Series del 4 al 9 de mayo con 14 barcos y el debut de tres equipos nuevos. Zulueta habla del presente y del futuro del circuito. ¿Qué novedades traen las Super Series en 2026? La principal es el…
Puerto Portals acogerá el inicio de la 15ª temporada de 52 Super Series del 4 al 9 de mayo con 14 barcos y el debut de tres equipos nuevos. Zulueta habla del presente y del futuro del circuito. ¿Qué novedades traen las Super Series ... en 2026? La principal es el número de barcos, 14 en Puerto Portals, incluyendo tres equipos nuevos. Tendremos hasta 16 a lo largo de la temporada. Estamos apretados en algunas sedes, pero nos asegura internacionalidad, incrementa el nivel y afianza al TP52 como barco referente de competición. ¿Qué esperas de Puerto Portals en mayo? Condiciones de viento diferentes a las de verano y temperaturas muchísimo más agradables. Pensamos que va a ser una mejor competición en el agua, reforzada por el magnífico ambiente social de Puerto Portals. ¿Qué criterios se aplican para la selección de sedes? Buenos campos de regata y buenas infraestructuras. Este año visitaremos dos nuevas sedes en Lanzarote, Marina Rubicón y Puerto Calero, lo que motiva mucho aunque es todo un desafío logístico: enviar 14 barcos y 28 contenedores en mercante es una operación complicada. Pero contamos con muy buenos profesionales que lo harán viable de una manera sencilla y coordinada. ¿Cómo es la salud de las 52 SUPER SERIES? Gozamos de una salud mejor incluso de la esperada. Contar con hasta 15 barcos en el Mundial de Porto Cervo en junio nos afianza como el mejor circuito de monocascos del mundo. No podríamos soñar estar en una situación como esta. ¿Cuánto más puede crecer la flota? Creo que es difícil que nos hagamos más grandes, por limitaciones de espacio en las sedes y por número de días al año de competición. Creo que hemos llegado a un equilibrio, a una buena dimensión a un costo razonable. No se trata de crecer, sino de mantener la excelencia. ¿Estamos más cerca de un proyecto español? Desgraciadamente creo que no. Me entristece saber que hay algún proyecto de barcos de esta eslora que no quieren sumarse al circuito de las 52 Super Series. Esperemos que esto cambie en el futuro. Cuando empezó en este proyecto, ¿pensaste estar así en 2026? Cuando empecé hace 13 años, lo que no pensaba era estar 13 años en el mismo proyecto. Pero poco a poco uno va echando raíces. Vamos a seguir remando, y a ver hasta cuándo. ¿Qué opina de la fórmula SailGP? Que lo están haciendo muy, muy bien. Que están llegando a un buen equilibrio, que tienen un departamento de comunicación excelente y que para los que busquen foileo es el 'place to be'. Yo creo que le están plantando cara o incluso superando a la Copa América, y no puedo más que darles la enhorabuena. ¿Su explotación comercial es aplicable a 52 Super Series? No, nada tiene que ver. Aunque tengamos el patrocinio común de Rolex, nuestro circuito tiene valores diferentes a los de SailGP. Ni mejores ni peores, pero diferentes. ¿Qué aporta 52 Super Series a una sede? Ingresos, visibilidad internacional y algo muy importante pero que no es cuantificable: si una sede lo hace bien y las 400 ó 500 personas que movemos están a gusto, se convierten automáticamente en embajadores de la sede alrededor del mundo. ¿Cuánto cuesta organizar un evento? Los costos directos son alrededor de 350.000 a 400.000 euros. Hay sedes que cubren el 25, el 50 o el 70%, pero su retorno es infinitamente mayor. Si hablamos de ingresos directos, sólo esas 400 ó 500 personas durante 10 días generan de 3 a 4 millones de euros. ¿Qué aporta a un patrocinador? Si la banca privada de Abanca nos incluye por tercer año como parte de su programa de hospitality es porque les gusta nuestro producto, porque lo disfrutan y porque consiguen una buena fidelización del cliente. Es importante que los patrocinadores estén contentos y repitan. ¿Qué novedades podemos esperar en el futuro? Hemos estado trabajando para ir a Tailandia en 2027 o en 2028, en función de cómo evolucione el conflicto internacional. También queremos ir a Italia con motivo de la Copa América. Con estos dos ingredientes y todas las sedes disponibles de años anteriores, haremos dos circuitos en 2027 y 2028 muy atractivos para los armadores. ¿Echa de menos dirigir un equipo de regatas? Lo echo mucho de menos. Especialmente el factor humano, de competición, de competitividad y de esfuerzo. Es algo que siempre ha estado unido a mi carrera y ahora lo echo mucho en falta. El destino me ha puesto donde en teoría debo estar y aquí estoy ahora, encantado de dirigir este circuito e intentando hacer lo mejor posible cada vez.
→ Apri originale
News Content Hub - North American owners turn to low-emissions tugs - rivieramm.com
📰 rivieramm.com Media 📅 2026-05-04 en
News Content Hub - North American owners turn to low-emissions tugs rivieramm.com
Shipyards in the US and Canada have completed several escort-class harbour tugs, as ports and terminals are expanded and larger ships welcomed Owners in North America welcomed newbuild tugs in Q1 2026 as demand for marine services increased in expanding ports, driven by rising energy exports. In the US, Master Boat Builders was busy launching and completing newbuild tugs for various domestic owners in the first three months of this year, as operators expand their fleets in Gulf Coast ports. The latest delivery by the Coden, Alabama-headquartered shipbuilder was 28-m harbour tug,Jill, built for Gulf LNG Tugs operations to handle gas carriers in Port Arthur, Texas. The ABS-class tug was constructed to Robert Allan Ltd’s RApport [2800 design with a beam of 12 m and 85 tonnes of bollard pull, with twin diesel engines linked to an exhaust aftertreatment system for compliance with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 emissions standards. Gulf LNG Tugs is a joint venture between US owners Bay-Houston Management, Bay Towing, Moran Towing and Suderman & Young Towing. The partnership operates at four LNG terminals along the US Gulf Coast and has more than 400 years of combined experience in ship assistance and towage services. “We have delivered a vessel that is not just a milestone in a series, but a powerhouse designed to meet the highest standards of safety and performance in the industry,” said Master Boat Builders president, Garret Rice. It has deck machinery ready to escort, tow and manoeuvre gas carriers and a FiFi1 firefighting system for emergency response during terminal support operations. In early April, Master Boat Builders launchedSaturnas the first H500 series tugboat it will be delivering to Texan owner, Suderman & Young Towing. "A powerhouse designed to meet the highest standards of safety" Four 30-m, ABS-class escort tugs are being built for the owner to Robert Allan’s RApport 3000 design, with accommodation for six crew members, a beam of 13 m, a bollard pull of 90 tonnes and a top speed of 13 knots. Propulsion for each consists of two diesel engines with a combined power of 5,220 kW, compliant with the EPA Tier 4 standards, driving two azimuth thrusters on the stern. This newbuilding programme comes as Suderman & Young is expanding its fleet and marine services in two ports in Texas, Brownsville and Isabel, near the Mexican border. In late March, Master Boat Builders also launchedMarauder, the first of eight tugboats being built for Maritime Partners. These 27-m tugs will be classed by ABS as escort tugs with automated machinery systems, underwater inspection in lieu of drydocking, FiFi1 firefighting capabilities and twin engines that comply with EPA Tier 4 requirements. All eight of these tugs are under some phase of construction after the shipyard started cutting steel on the eighth vessel in April. In Florida, Eastern Shipbuilding Group (ESG) launched the second of four 26-m escort tugs it is building for Seattle, Washington-headquartered Saltchuk Marine, with the first close to completion. These tugs are being built at ESG’s facilities in Allanton and Port St Joe for ship escort and towage across the US West Coast, Hawaii and Alaska. The first was launched in December 2025 and the second in April 2026 by crane lift from the shore to a quayside at the shipyard. “These four vessels set a new maritime standard that will positively impact the industry by meeting new rigorous environmental requirements.” said Saltchuk Marine president and chief executive, Jason Childs. They are being built to Robert Allan’s RAmport 2600 design with a moulded beam of 13 m, a moulded depth of 4 m, navigation draught of 6 m and accommodation for eight crew members. Their propulsion consists of two Caterpillar-manufactured Cat 3516E main diesel engines, each developing 2,610 kW at 1,800 rpm, and compliant with EPA Tier 4 regulations, driving two Schottel rudderpropellers of type SRP 510. Saltchuk’s new tugs will have a bollard pull of 86 tonnes and a top speed ahead of 12 knots. They feature a Markey Machine single-drum, class II hawser winch, with 56 kW of type DEPGF-52. Moran’s latest fleet addition, 395-gt, 28-mJ. Themistoclis Moran, is operating in Beaumont, Texas, after its delivery in early 2026. This 28-m tug was built to Robert Allan’s RApport 2800 design with a 12-m beam, and two Cat 3512E diesel engines, compliant with EPA Tier 4 standards, driving two Kongsberg US 2055 azimuthing Z drives with a fixed-pitch propeller. In Q1 2026, McAllister Towing mobilised its latest newbuild harbour tugboat,Gerald McAllister,from the shipyard in New England to expand its fleet supporting ships calling at terminals in New York. It is the fifth in a six-tug series of 84-tonne bollard pull tugs that Washburn & Doughty Associates is building in Maine for the New York-headquartered owner. This ABS-classed, 28-m tug has 5,050 kW of installed power from two Cat 3516E, EPA Tier 4-compliant engines, driving two Schottel azimuth Z-drives. Canadian newbuilds Ocean Industries has delivered the third of four 24-m harbour tugs it is building for the Royal Canadian Navy at its shipyard in Isle-aux-Coudres, Quebec, Canada, with the fourth scheduled for completion in Q4 2026. Canadian Forces auxiliary vessel (CFAV)Cansoleft the shipyard in January and started operations in Halifax in March 2026. It followed delivery of CFAVHaroand CFAVBarkervillein 2024 and their deployment in Esquimalt, British Columbia. Ocean is building these naval tugs to Robert Allan’s RAmparts 2400 design and with a bollard pull of 60 tonnes and a top speed of 12 knots, coming from two Everllence-manufactured 12-cylinder 12V 175D-MM high-speed engines, with CFAVStella Marisstill under construction. In Q1 2026, Ocean received a contract extension to build two more of these tugs, with deployment of CFAVSansumin Esquimalt and CFAVBelle Islein Halifax anticipated in 2027 and 2028. Forillon Shipyard delivered 12-m tugboatHollyAnnto Quebec-headquartered Centurion Foundation. It has twin Cummins QSL9 engines, each rated at 250 kW, a beam of 4 m and a draught of 2 m. This 14-gt tug can be transported on a single flatbed lorry. The28th International Tug & Salvage Convention, Exhibition & Awardswill be held in Gothenburg, Sweden, in association with Caterpillar, 19-21 May 2026.Use this linkfor more details of this industry event and the associated social and networking opportunities. Events © 2026 Riviera Maritime Media Ltd.
→ Apri originale
IMO, il Net Zero Framework resiste al sabotaggio ma il negoziato resta aperto - Materia Rinnovabile | Renewable Matter
📰 Materia Rinnovabile | Renewable Matter 📅 2026-05-04 it Clima · decarbonizzazione
IMO, il Net Zero Framework resiste al sabotaggio ma il negoziato resta aperto Materia Rinnovabile | Renewable Matter
Materia Rinnovabile https://renewablematter.eu/codice-etico-materia-rinnovabile Si è chiusa venerdì 1° maggio l’84ª sessione del Comitato per la protezione dell'ambiente marino (MEPC 84) dell'Organizzazione marittima internazionale (IMO). L’argomento più divisivo è stato quello del Net Zero Framework (NZF), un quadro di riferimento per la transizione del settore marittimo globale dai combustibili fossili. Nonostante vari tentativi di farlo deragliare, la maggioranza degli stati membri (59) ha deciso di accettare il NZF, così come originariamente concordato e già approvato in linea di principio nell’aprile 2025, come base per i lavori futuri per applicare la Strategia GHG 2023 dell’IMO per la riduzione delle emissioni di gas a effetto serra da parte delle navi. I tentativi di affossare il NZF sono venuti da un lato da parte di Stati Uniti, Arabia Saudita e di altri petrostati, e dall’altro da parte dei più grandi stati bandiera, quali Liberia e Panama (rispettivamente 16,41% e 14,62% di navi registrate). Brasile e Cina si sono invece espressi in supporto del NZF, così come le Isole Marshall (il terzo stato bandiera più importante, con 11,35% delle navi registrate) e l’Unione Europea. Stati Uniti tra minacce e dati inaffidabili Nell’aprile 2025, durante l’83ª sessione del MEPC (MEPC 83), gli stati membri avevano raggiunto un accordo di principio in favore del NZF con 63 voti favorevoli e 16 contrari. Normalmente, il NZF avrebbe dovuto essere approvato in via definitiva nell’ottobre 2025 durante la seconda sessione straordinaria (MEPC.ES2). Tuttavia, tra MEPC 83 e MEPC.ES2, diversi paesi hanno modificato la propria posizione a causa di forti pressioni esercitate dagli operatori del settore e/o dal governo degli Stati Uniti che aveva minacciato ritorsioni nei confronti dei paesi che avessero sostenuto il NZF. Nel generale clima di paura legata alle possibili ripercussioni economiche minacciate dagli USA, l’Arabia Saudita aveva strategicamente usato le regole procedurali – così come fatto anche nel caso delle negoziazioni sul clima e su quelle contro l’inquinamento da plastica − per posporre il voto sull’adozione del NZF. A conclusione di MEPC.ES2 aveva infatti chiesto di votare per rimandare il voto di approvazione del NZF di un anno, e 61 paesi si sono espressi a favore di tale aggiornamento. Mercoledì della settimana precedente, durante MEPC 84, gli Stati Uniti hanno messo in atto un altro tipo di dissuasione, facendo circolare dei volantini, uno per ogni paese, in cui mostravano i costi per l’implementazione del NZF che secondo gli osservatori “sono imprecisi ed esagerati”. Un osservatore ha dichiarato a Materia Rinnovabile: “Mentre da un lato i dati di origine sui costi di commercio e trasporto di base del paese sono validi, il metodo per stimare il costo di conformità da quei dati sembra essere difettoso in diversi ambiti, il che risulta in stime probabilmente fortemente sopravvalutate”. Sempre secondo lo stesso osservatore, “gli Stati Uniti cercano di usare argomentazioni basate sui dati, ma manipolano la metodologia per raggiungere il loro obiettivo”, il che rende gli Stati Uniti “sempre più inaffidabili come fonte credibile”. Della stessa opinione Felix Klann, responsabile delle politiche marittime presso Transport & Environment, una no-profit europea che sostiene trasporti ed energia pulita: “Non si tratta di un’analisi credibile, bensì di un’esagerazione calcolata volta a spaventare i membri, che ha suscitato perplessità in seno all’IMO. L'IMO fornisce già dati solidi sui costi della transizione, mentre la valutazione degli Stati Uniti opta per un calcolo errato in malafede e per l'allarmismo al fine di proteggere gli interessi dei combustibili fossili. Pur fingendo di mostrare preoccupazione per il settore, gli Stati Uniti stanno pianificando di assicurarsi miliardi in diritti portuali senza contribuire con un centesimo alla transizione energetica”. Le proposte per eliminare un prezzo per le emissioni di gas serra previsto dal NZF In linea con la Strategia GHG 2023 dell’IMO per la riduzione delle emissioni di gas a effetto serra da parte delle navi, il NZF prevede sia un elemento tecnico che un elemento economico. Per quello che riguarda l’elemento tecnico, definisce uno standard globale per i carburanti (global fuel standard, GFS), che richiede alle navi di ridurre gradualmente quanto può inquinare il carburante della nave (cioè la quantità di gas serra emessa per ogni unità di energia utilizzata). Per quello che riguarda l’elemento economico, stabilisce un prezzo minimo per le emissioni di gas a effetto serra (GHG) prodotte dalle navi che utilizzano carburanti non conformi ai criteri di intensità delle emissioni. Le risorse così raccolti andrebbero a finanziare il Net Zero Fund, pensato per finanziare la decarbonizzazione della flotta mercantile globale e sostenere i lavoratori e le economie portuali nella transizione ecologica. Con l’obiettivo di presentare opzioni più accettabili a Stati Uniti e Arabia Saudita, durante MEPC 84 sono emerse due proposte alternative al NZF, una portata avanti da Argentina, Liberia e Panama, e un’altra dal Giappone. Entrambe tirano al ribasso le ambizioni del NZF e prevedono l’eliminazione dell’elemento economico e di conseguenza il Net Zero Fund per il sostegno alla decarbonizzazione. Come riportato dall’UCL Energy Institute, le due proposte complessivamente hanno avuto il supporto di 31 stati membri, ovvero meno del 30% di tutti gli stati e “non sembrano rappresentare vie d'uscita praticabili”. Questo è importante, perché normalmente se c'è una chiara “corsa a due”, ad esempio due proposte con livelli di sostegno simili, spesso possono essere fuse. Tuttavia, dicono gli analisti, se esiste una proposta che gode chiaramente della maggioranza, è molto più difficile per i sostenitori delle proposte che raccolgono un consenso significativamente minore ottenere concessioni rilevanti. Questo dovrebbe favorire il NZF, a meno di nuovi cambiamenti nelle posizioni dei paesi nei prossimi mesi. Sollievo delle ONG ma urgenza di agire "Il Framework è sopravvissuto, ma la sopravvivenza non è una vittoria e non possiamo finire in un ciclo di negoziati aperti. Prendere in considerazione più proposte è accettabile solo come ponte, non come destinazione. Ora dobbiamo guardare avanti all'adozione del Quadro entro la fine dell'anno in modo da mantenere urgenza e ambizione, e garantire giustizia ed equità ai paesi più impattati dai cambiamenti climatici", ha detto a Materia Rinnovabile Em Fenton, Senior Director - Climate Diplomacy presso l'organizzazione no-profit Opportunity Green con sede nel Regno Unito. “È un sollievo che il Net Zero Framework sia sopravvissuto, ma l'IMO non può permettere che i ritardi diventino la nuova normalità”, ha aggiunto Felix Klann. “Non è il momento di scendere a compromessi che annacquino l'accordo o di rimandare il problema. Questo non farebbe altro che favorire Trump e i suoi amici petrolieri. I governi ambiziosi devono sfruttare il tempo extra per riaffermare il loro impegno a favore di un vero accordo per le emissioni zero. Non possiamo accontentarci di un accordo debole che si limiti a ratificare lo status quo proprio quando l'azione per il clima è più necessaria.” Anche l’International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), che rappresenta circa l'80% del tonnellaggio mercantile mondiale grazie all'adesione di associazioni nazionali di armatori, accoglie favorevolmente la decisione di usare il NZF come base per le prossime negoziazioni. “Il settore marittimo è pienamente impegnato a realizzare gli obiettivi della Strategia IMO sui gas serra del 2023 e ha già ottenuto una sostanziale riduzione delle emissioni di gas serra”, ha detto Thomas A. Kazakos, segretario generale dell’International Chamber of Shipping (ICS). “È fondamentale che i governi procedano quanto prima all’adozione di un quadro globale completo e adeguato allo scopo, per consentire al settore di accelerare ulteriormente la sua rapida transizione verso fonti energetiche alternative. Accogliamo quindi con favore la decisione di convocare ulteriori negoziati a settembre, ai quali l’ICS intende contribuire con idee su una possibile via da seguire per ottenere il necessario sostegno da parte di tutti gli stati membri.” Tre possibili scenari In vista della MEPC 85 (dal 30 novembre al 3 dicembre) sono previste due riunioni intersessionali (dal 1° al 4 settembre e dal 23 al 27 novembre). La seconda sessione straordinaria (MEPC.ES2) che era stata aggiornata lo scorso ottobre a seguito dell’intervento dell’Arabia Saudita, dovrebbe riprendere il 4 dicembre, previa discussione in sede di MEPC 85. Secondo gli osservatori, la pressione esercitata da Stati Uniti e Arabia Saudita contro il NZF rimarrà forte nei prossimi mesi. Tuttavia, notano i ricercatori dell’UCL Energy Institute, il soft power e l’influenza degli Stati Uniti hanno subìto un impatto a causa di vari eventi verificatisi a partire dall’ottobre 2025, che potrebbero aver modificato l’efficacia di tale pressione. Inoltre, la sentenza della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti che nel febbraio 2026 ha annullato i dazi globali che erano stati imposti dal presidente statunitense Donald Trump riduce anch’essa la capacità di esercitare pressioni sugli altri paesi. Secondo gli esperti ci sono tre opzioni possibili, in base a quelle che saranno le posizioni dei paesi durante le riunioni intersessionali. Primo caso: vengono fatte modifiche minori al testo del NZF così come già approvato ad aprile 2025, e allora si potrebbe arrivare al voto per l’approvazione del NZF già alla fine di quest’anno. Secondo caso: non si riesce a portare a termine le modifiche minori, oppure vi sono modifiche più sostanziali che stanno ottenendo sostegno. Ciò ridurrebbe la probabilità di adozione del NZF nel 2026, anche se non del tutto impossibile. Terzo caso: c’è una nuova inversione di dinamica e una “riapertura” più radicale dell'NZF. In questo caso i tempi di adesione si allungherebbero ulteriormente. In copertina: immagine Envato
→ Apri originale
Deals: Entry M5 MacBook Air all-time low, AirPods Max 2, M3 iPad Air $300 off, Magic Mouse Amazon low, more
📰 9to5Mac 📅 2026-05-04 en
Joining all of the Star Wars May the 4th deals we have live today (scope out our deal hub), your 9to5Toys Lunch Break is ready to roll starting with the most affordable new M5 MacBook Air dropping to the $949 low ($150 off) alongside other models at up to $21…
Joining all of theStar Wars May the 4th dealswe have live today (scope out our deal hub), your9to5Toys Lunch Breakis ready to roll starting with the most affordable newM5 MacBook Air dropping to the $949 low ($150 off)alongside other models atup to $219 off. Apple’s least expensive newM4 iPad Air has now hit a new Amazon lowwhile the256GB 13-inch M3 modeldrops to its best clearance priceat $300 off. We have Apple’s newAirPods Max 2 down at a new Amazon all-time low, the ongoingAirPods Pro 3 Mother’s Day deal, and the latestMagic Mouse back to the best Amazon price ever. Head below for a closer look. Amazon has nowkicked off a giant May the 4th sale of its own, loaded with everything from merch and apparelthrough to LEGO sets, toys, collectibles, bed sheets, Funko Pop! collectibles,The Black Series replica helmets and Lightsabers, and much more. You canbrowse through the entire sale right hereandscope out everything else right here. The MacBook Air deals are rolling on ahead of Mother’s Day this year, and alongside some special offers from B&H (detailed below), Amazon has, for the most part, had a lock on themost affordable new M5 MacBook Air model– the Silver, Midnight, and Sky Blue models have now dropped a touch lower to$949 shipped. Amazon is now offering the13-inch M5 MacBook Airwith 16GB of RAM and the 512GB SSDdown at$949 shipped. Now live on almost all colors (the Starlight is only $1 more anyway), you’re looking at a straight up $150 off on the regularly $1,099 machine and the best price we have tracked to date on the most affordable model in the new lineup. We tracked this one at $149 off more than a few times, but this is the first time we have seen this many color options at a straight up $150 off the list price via Amazon. This deal is, by and large, available across the lineup right now, just be sure to pay close attention to some of the special bundle offers we caught over at B&H – they are still live and delivering over $200 in savings on select 15-inch configurations: We spotted some new all-time lows landing on mid-range models in the new M4 iPad Air lineup over the weekend, and now Amazon hasdropped the price on the most affordable modelyou can buy down to anew all-time low. Amazon is now offering the entry level11-inch M4 iPad Air with 128GB of storage down at$519.99 shipped. This is a regularly $599 configuration now sitting down at the lowest price we have tracked at Amazon since release in March. Now live on all four colors, the$79price dropmight not seem like a giant one but the iPad Air lineup rarely sees overly deep discounts until later in the lifecycle, or until the next-gen model releases. And even then the price drops are not often as deep as we see on other Apple products. The deepest price drop we have seen on the new M4 Air is the$100 offwe are still tracking right now on the most pricey1TB model, but there are also deals live across the lineup if the 128GB 11-inch isn’t working for you: It’s not a giant price drop or anything, but if you are looking to land a brand new set of Apple’s next-generationAirPods Max 2the Midnight and Starlight models have now hit anew Amazon all-time low. Amazon is now offeringApple’s AirPods Max 2 down at$509.99 shipped. This deal is only live on the Midnight and Starlight colorways, but we are talking about a new Amazon all-time low and the best price we have tracked in brand new condition since release. Regularly $549, this is not a giant discount by any means, but deals have been somewhere between very light and non existent on the new Max 2 since release and this is, at the very least, a chance to land a set for less. This deal also joins some ongoing price drops on Apple’s latest in-ear solutions ahead of Mother’s Day. If you are looking to refresh your personal Apple listening experience or upgrade mom’s before then, here are the best Amazon has to offer right now: While the new Max 2 and previous USB-C set are largely the same, including weight, the Smart Case, and the colors, the new set carries Apple’s H2 chip to support a series of enhanced features: a new amp, “elevated sound quality,” up to “1.5x more Active Noise Cancellation” than previous iterations, a Camera remote control, and you only have to say “Siri” instead of “Hey Siri.” Acomplete rundown of what’s new awaits over at9to5Macright here. B&H is on fire this week with the 2026 M5 MacBook Air and M5 Pro MacBook Pro deals. While the bulk of the best deals are still over at Amazon, the authorized Apple dealers at B&H have more than a few configs undercutting the big boys right now and if you’re looking for some serious horsepower, it is now offering thebase model M5 Max MacBook Pro at$300 offthe list price. B&H is now offering the 14-inch M5 Max MacBook Pro that released this past March with36GB of RAM and a 2TB storage capacity down at$3,299 shipped. It is listed at $3,359, but an additional $60 will get slashed from the already discounted price during checkout. This is a regularly $3,599 machine and the most affordable M5 Max you can buy. That, I guess, is a wild thing to say considering the MSRP here, but we are talking about Apple’s fastest and most powerful chip loaded with RAM and storage space too. It’s not for everyone, but if you’re going to spend that much you might as well keep the $300 in your pocket and grab it at B&H. This same machine is selling for$3,359at Amazon right now – the lowest it has sold for there. Here are more of this week’s best 2026 MacBook Pro deals to scope out, alongside thebase M5 at one of its lowest prices: FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
→ Apri originale
Rotterdam port area emissions rise 11% in 2025 - Container News
📰 Container News 📅 2026-05-04 📍 Rotterdam en
Rotterdam port area emissions rise 11% in 2025 Container News
Greenhouse gas emissions from companies in the Port of Rotterdam industrial cluster increased by 2.1 million tonnes, or 11% , between 2024 and 2025, reaching a total of 21.2 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent. The increase was driven primarily by higher electricity generation at the port’s power plants in response to stronger foreign demand from European markets, according to data published by the Netherlands Emissions Authority. The five power plants operating in the port area collectively emitted 1.6 million tonnes, or 33 percent, more greenhouse gases in 2025 than in the prior year. Coal-fired power plants increased electricity production by 38%, while the three gas-fired plants produced 25 percent more, generating a comparable rise in CO₂ emissions. The increase in power generation was not a purely local phenomenon. Across the Netherlands as a whole, electricity production from coal rose 25% and from natural gas 11 percent, with approximately a quarter of this additional output originating from Rotterdam. The 6% growth in Dutch renewable electricity generation from solar and wind sources was insufficient to satisfy European demand, necessitating the increased output from fossil fuel plants. Refinery activity in the port also expanded in 2025, driven by higher refining margins in Northwest Europe. The four refineries in the Rotterdam port area processed more crude oil than in 2024, contributing an additional 0.3 million tonnes or 4% to the cluster’s total emissions. The port area’s share of national greenhouse gas emissions stood at 14.5% in 2025. The emissions data illustrates the tension between Rotterdam’s role as a critical node in the European energy system and the port’s longer-term decarbonisation objectives, with short-term energy security demands from neighbouring countries driving increased fossil fuel output despite broader transition commitments.
→ Apri originale
007 First Light’s Bond gets creative in ways that would make Agent 47 smile
📰 TechRadar 📅 2026-05-04 en
Our time with IO Interactive’s take on James Bond was filled with smart multi-approach spy action, intense shoot-outs, and one of the most unique vehicle chase sequences in the franchise.
Let’s be honest here: Activision's take on James Bond games didn’t reach the heights of Electronic Arts’ era, nor the iconic solo outing of Nintendo and Rare. It’s been well over a decade since the god-awful007 Legends, and nearly six years sinceHitmandeveloper IO Interactive announced the project eventually titled007 First Light. Last September, we walked away fromour first hands-onwith the stealth action-adventure impressed. Its stealth, shooting and driving sequences easily made it one of our most anticipated games of 2026; however, the overwhelmingly linear demo lacked the creative sandbox many hoped for from theHitmanmaker. Following a three-hour demo at a special hands-on event in Downtown Los Angeles recently, I can now confirm that007 First Lighttakes the promise of a digital Bond and infuses some clever creativity in tackling objectives in ways that’ll remind many ofHitman’s Agent 47. Spread across three distinct sections of the game, they not only showcased various gameplay mechanics but also showed how they’ll be layered as the single player progresses. The introductory mission at the start of007 First Lightdoes something no other game in the franchise has done before: it establishes who the iconic British hero was before joining MI6. When we’re introduced to actor Patrick Gibson’s take on Bond, a naval officer riding overseas in a helicopter en route to a base somewhere in Iceland. The squad of choppers is attacked by missiles, destroying many of them and sending them into the ocean depths. As Bond tries to regain consciousness and avoid his watery grave, players are hit with a quick-time sequence to reach the ocean’s surface. After making his way to the shore, we see our first glimpse of terrain traversal, with Bond climbing, shimmying among ledges, dashing between cover, hiding among tall grass, squeezing between cracks and jumping across ledges. He eventually finds himself guided by an MI6 agent who instructs him to recover a hard drive, a mission that sees him tackle everything from finding a nerve agent antidote, battling color blindness and a daring escape from the terrorist organization he infiltrates, culminating in his defying the MI6 agent to help rescue two groups of researchers held captive by the terrorist group. This portion grants players the opportunity to decide the order in which the set of captives gets rescued, covertly using distractions and stealth takedowns to complete the job at hand. The high stakes are established immediately; if Bond is caught, he can try to escape, but it only takes a couple of bullets to take him down if he stands his ground and fights. It’s wonderfully reminiscent of some ofHitman’s finest stealth sequences, but007 First Lighthas plenty of its own strengths. The second segment I played featured a slice of a later mission in Malta, where Bond undergoes some of his early MI6 training. It’s here where players are introduced to a central mechanic in007 First Light: Bond’s iconic gadget-laden watch, but also a great demonstration of the creative license players have in approaching each obstacle. Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more. For this segment, Bond is tasked by MI6 agent Greenway (portrayed byThe Walking Deadalum Lennie James) with reaching the flag by any means necessary. The watch is controlled through two separate meters: electronic and chemical. The electronic meter controls capabilities such as a laser and hacking tool, and can be recharged with power tool batteries, car battery cells and the like. Meanwhile, chemicals fuel tools like poison darts and can be refilled by picking up things like cleaning supplies or hand sanitizer. During this sequence, there are plenty of ways to reach the flag. For me, that included some silent takedowns, throwing bricks or wrenches to disable an enemy (reminiscent ofThe Last of Us), pure combat, and even using the watch to burst open a bag of sand to cause a distraction. Getting spotted by the guards even led to some great combat moments, where players can perform simple combos with a singular attack button, parry highlighted by yellow flashes, dodge strong red flashing attacks and grappling. Grabbing an enemy can lead to context-sensitive actions ranging from repositioning and punching them to throwing them in any particular direction. Take too long, and the guards will call for reinforcements, so Bond has to act quickly. The final demo chapter was an incredibly long and eventful mid-game mission that takes place in Kensington, London, pairing these mixed stealth mechanics with some exciting shootouts. Following an ambush on Bond in his own apartment, players are thrown into a thrilling foot chase sequence as he hunts down the assassin, which ultimately ends in Bond being ungraciously booted from a rooftop by the assailant. A tip from Moneypenny sees Bond sneak into a museum gala hosted by a tech mogul in pursuit of his would-be killer, with the main mission split into key tasks as well as smaller objectives. For instance, in my case, gaining entrance to the gala involved refilling the chemical meter on Bond’s watch with some hand sanitizer I found, poisoning an unsuspecting guest with a dart, and then swiping her ticket to smoothly pass security. It was a cool moment reminiscent ofHitman, and doubly so for the richness and interactivity — watching my poison victim head to a nearby trash can to throw up was especially funny. Once inside, I was impressed by how densely populated the gala was. It definitely reminded me of some ofHitman World of Assassinationtrilogy’s greatest visual moments, such as the Paris fashion show and Sapienza town. Plus, the character model quality of these NPCs nearly matched Bond, animations were fluid, the lighting was great thanks to path tracing support and everything was rendered in beautiful detail thanks to DLSS 4.5 support on theNvidiaGPU-powered Alienware Area-51 desktop we played on. We didn’t notice any slowdown during our playthrough outside of this section either, and007 First Lightis a great showcase of IO’s Glacier engine. Audio is equally spot-on, from the murmur of the gala’s busy crowds to the tense ambient music and touches of the dynamic soundtrack. Once again, this level demonstrates the varied ways in which Bond can complete his mission, this time in an effort to hack into the security system so Moneypenny can trace the assassin’s whereabouts. By eavesdropping on conversations between attendees, you can collect clues and formulate a cover for Bond, sneaking him into the second-floor security room through whatever means necessary. Sometimes, you’ll have to convince NPCs of your identity, and it’s here that you can use the Instinct system to pick the best outcome and even flirt to distract or persuade them. That, or you can just pickpocket them, though I learned the hard way that this can result in combat if you fail. Ultimately, you’ll reach the Basement Archives at the museum’s lower levels, where an unarmed Bond is met with a climactic boss fight against the very-much-armed mysterious assassin. Again, IO Interactive’s creative approach shines here — tackling the assassin head-on will lead to death if you take too many hits, so you’ll use Bond’s watch to manipulate the environment against the foe. Whether that’s by triggering hazards like an electric floor, bringing a chandelier crashing down or turning on an exhaust pipe at the right time, the choice is yours, and it’s great fun to find your own way. While theHitmaninfluence is clear throughout007 First Light, it’s unmistakably a Bond game, and it’s all the better for it. Its punchy, white-knuckle cinematic shootout sequences are a blast, transitioning seamlessly to close melee combat — though camera positioning for these can sometimes be a little awkward. Instinct mode makes another appearance in combat, too, allowing you to slow down time for some well-placed shots, but if things get too hot and heavy you can always turn tail to regenerate some health. Add interactable items and Bond’s watch to the mix, and you’ll be exploding conveniently placed barrels to your heart’s content. Still, it’s just as fun to simply make your escape with the least possible casualties. Plus, outside of stealth and combat, Bond’s social skills in manipulation and negotiation are at the fore; one segment sees Bond tied to a chair, baiting his captors by alternating between insults and stall tactics to lure them closer so he can remotely hack their phones and escape. Less than a month before release,007 First Lightis looking to be the definitive Bond experience, and for anyone worrying about Gibson being up to the task as 007, he provides a fun and charming Bond who is more care-free like Pierce Brosnan than the ultra seriousness of Daniel Craig. The developers have done a fine job in blending the spectacle spy-action the films are known for with the sandbox freedom of its legendaryHitmanfranchise. That’s achieved with clever investigative moments, some fine melee combat, punchy shooting, clever usage of quick-time events and mini games and at least one absolutely awesome car chase. IO Interactive may have a Bond game that may reach the heights ofGoldeneye 007andEverything or Nothing. 007 First Lightdrops May 27, 2026, on PlayStation 5,Xbox Series XandSeries S, and PC, withNintendo Switch 2coming in the summer. Follow TechRadar on Google Newsandadd us as a preferred sourceto get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Ural Garrett is an Inglewood, CA-based journalist and content curator. His byline has been featured in outlets including CNN, MTVNews, Complex, TechRadar, BET, The Hollywood Reporter and more. You must confirm your public display name before commenting Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
→ Apri originale
Augusta Marcellino: idrocarburi fissi in aria, benzene 4 volte il limite - ecostiera.it
📰 ecostiera.it 📅 2026-05-04 📍 Augusta it Salute · ambiente
Augusta Marcellino: idrocarburi fissi in aria, benzene 4 volte il limite ecostiera.it
AUGUSTA – Respirare idrocarburi non metanici in abbondanza, praticamente ogni santo giorno. E inalare picchi di benzene oltre il 450 per cento, una quantità tale da fare quasi schizzare fuori scala persino le centraline di monitoraggio. E’ ancora preoccupante il report di Arpa Sicilia sulla qualità dell’aria nel Petrolchimico di Priolo, rilevata lo scorso marzo. Questo 2026 è iniziato col paradosso di una crisi nella produzione della zona industriale, ma con le immissioni nocive nell’atmosfera che fanno segnare ancora qualche record. Specialmente nella stazione di Augusta Marcellino, la più vicina alle banchine del porto commerciale. Dove le strumentazioni hanno registrato quasi quotidianamente sforamenti della soglia di Nmhc, con valori in media sopra quattro volte il consentito, e con punte che hanno toccato il 650 per cento. Il grafico allegato alla relazione dell’Agenzia regionale protezione ambiente, parla da solo. Fra l’altro, per questi composti organici volatili classificati come inquinanti primari, il limite di 200 microgrammi per metro cubo è persino obsoleto. Lo fissava un Dpcm del 1983, ma poi la quantità massima ammessa dalla legge è stata abrogata da un Decreto legislativo del 2010. E oggi, “in assenza di una normativa a livello comunitario, nazionale e regionale” si utilizza “come valore di riferimento la concentrazione oraria” indicata nel vecchio decreto, “seppur cautelativamente”. sopra e sotto: i grafici del rapporto Arpa per marzo 2026. Benzene supera per 5 volte l’ampia soglia per le zone industriali, un picco sfora del 650 per cento. sopra e copertina, la zona industriale (foto generiche di repertorio). Stessa “cautela” normativa è per il benzene, come emerge sempre dal report Arpa riguardante marzo 2026, ma pubblicato alla fine di aprile. Il decreto di 16 anni fa prevede “solo un valore limite annuo pari a 5” microgrammi per metro cubo. “Tuttavia si è osservato che le concentrazioni orarie negli agglomerati urbani, in cui non sono presenti impianti industriali, in genere non superano i 20 µg/m3, pertanto si utilizza tale concentrazione come utile riferimento, per individuare eventi in cui la componente industriale è rilevante”. Cioè, vicino uno stabilimento petrolchimico diventa “normale” avere una qualità dell’aria quattro volte inferiore, almeno in termini di misurazione. Eppure quell’inquinante è risultato così cancerogeno, che una Direttiva europea ha abbassato dell’80 per cento il limite per l’esposizione dei lavoratori, passando da 3,25 a 0,66 milligrammi per metro cubo. Anche in questo caso, il grafico dell’Agenzia ambiente è eloquente riguardo la stazione di monitoraggio al Marcellino. Il rapporto parla di ben 5 picchi oltre il limite, registrati il 2 e il 3, il 16, il 20 e il 21. Sono tutti giorni che hanno preceduto o seguito subito un week end. Idrocarburi non metanici fissi nell’aria più vicina a Punta Cugno, nell’Isola sforano 3 volte. monitoraggio ambientale alla nuova darsena dell’Isola. Il favore della brezza marina ha risparmiato il quartiere urbano del Paradiso, come ha registrato la centralina piazzata nella nuova darsena, dove la soglia di benzene è stata sfiorata una volta sola. Neanche i venti dal largo, però, hanno potuto tenere lontani gli idrocarburi non metanici, presenti in grande quantità nell’atmosfera sopra il Marcellino. La strumentazione sull’isola di Augusta ha infatti registrato per 3 volte un lieve superamento di Nmhc, mentre la lancetta di quella piazzata vicina Punta Cugno impazziva praticamente quasi ogni giorno. Tuttavia il monitoraggio olfattivo del progetto Nose “non ha registrato alcun Alert durante il mese, sebbene sia scattato un campionamento dell’odorprep presso l’ufficio comunale di Priolo il 10 marzo. Inoltre è stato effettuato un sopralluogo il 19 marzo a Priolo, su richiesta del Comune stesso, a seguito di molestie olfattive causate dalla fuoriuscita di idrocarburi da un serbatoio della Isab sud in data 18 marzo”. E’ l’unico imputato individuato dalle analisi Arpa sui monitoraggi. Le manutenzioni e gli sfiaccolamenti di Sonatrach, censiti quel mese dall’albo pretorio comunale, non compaiono nel report dell’Agenzia. Appare invece la statistica sulle segnalazioni degli utenti registrati al Network for odour sensitivity, realizzato in collaborazione col Cnr, Istituto di scienze dell’atmosfera e del clima. Sono numeri significativi solo per ciò che i nasi umani percepiscono, molto più limitati dei sensori elettronici. Nose: Augusta prima fra i comuni Aerca per segnalazioni, intensità di puzze e malesseri accusati. Stop veleni, manifestazione di protesta. Fra i 6 comuni dell’Area a elevato rischio di crisi ambientale, Augusta è quello da dove arrivano le maggiori segnalazioni al Nose di puzze industriali. Il dato in sé tuttavia non può dire molto, perché è anche la città dove il comitato ambientalista Stop veleni ha fatto un’efficace opera di sensibilizzazione alla popolazione. Su 248 eventi segnalati nel mese investigato da Arpa, sono 66 quelli arrivati da augustani. Sono loro ad aver avvertito maggiormente la presenza di idrocarburi nell’aria, il 26 per cento delle segnalazioni totali. Così come è dalla città fra i due porti che sono stati denunciati gli odori più forti (19,4 per cento), seguita a distanza da Melilli (16,1) e Priolo (13,7). Fra i malesseri registrato nell’Aerca di Siracusa, oltre un quarto ha accusato mal di testa, un 16 per cento problemi agli occhi, e più di un quarto irritazioni alla gola. I megaresi guidano anche questa classifica, immediatamente seguiti dai melillesi. Il rapporto si conclude con “Arpa Sicilia ringrazia tutti i cittadini che collaborano con Nose”. Ma difficilmente da questi arriverà un “prego, dovere” senza iniziative per individuare chi causa quei picchi che odorano di cancro.
→ Apri originale
PM Modi's poll gains point to push on India's civil law reform, infrastructure
📰 The Times of India 📅 2026-05-04 en
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party is poised for significant wins in state elections. These victories could speed up the implementation of major policies like a uniform civil code and infrastructure development. The results highlight the success of Modi's s…
Election Results 2026 Live Updates: Who's ahead in which state West Bengal Election Results 2026 Live Updates TN Election Result 2026 Live Updates 3 years on, India rebuilds aircraft lessors’ trust that Go First broke First-time buyers, entry cars: The missing links in India’s auto boom Locker to exchange: How India can become a global gold hub Amid FII flight and BoP strain, India bets on ‘patient capital’ Bold promises vs. hard proof: Indian IT faces an AI test this fiscal Warren Buffett: Why ‘risk’ doesn't mean what Wall Street says it means
→ Apri originale
Quale la sfida dei porti nella situazione geopolitica attuale - Il Nautilus
📰 Il Nautilus 📅 2026-05-04 it
Quale la sfida dei porti nella situazione geopolitica attuale Il Nautilus
(Porti strategici italiani: Trieste e Brindisi; Punti critici globale: Suez e Hormuz; map courtesy Google) Molti sono gli incontri istituzionali e non, in ambito europeo, che trattano questi temi, sottolineando che i porti, le navi e l’energia sono causa ed effetto della strategia energetica globale Stiamo vivendo una situazione geopolitica capace di compromettere il sistema dei trasporti in tutte le sue modalità. Le guerre nel Mediterraneo e nel Medio Oriente – US&Israel e Russia sull’Ucraina – stanno generando effetti immediati sul commercio marittimo internazionale e su tutta la catena degli approvvigionamenti. L’instabilità geopolitica sta trasformando i passaggi marittimi vitali in zone ad alto rischio, costringendo il settore a una continua riorganizzazione: crisi degli stretti – Hormuz e Suez – hanno rallentato i traffici in questo inizio 2026 e azzerato in quello iraniano; rerouting (cambio rotta): per evitare zone ad alto rischio, molte navi circumnavigano l’Africa via il Capo di Buona Speranza, con un aumento della distanza del 30-40% e una triplicazione dei costi dei noli; congestione operativa: i porti situati fuori dalle zone di conflitto devono gestire volumi di carico improvvisi e deviati, subendo forti ritardi nella distribuzione. Ed ancora, i porti europei sono diventati centrali per la sicurezza nazionale e la transizione verde: – hub per l’energia: molti scali, specialmente in Italia, stanno puntando a diventare leader nella fornitura di energia elettrica e nella gestione di impianti eolici per garantire l’autonomia energetica del Paese; – transizione verde: l’applicazione di normative come la tassa ETS sulle emissioni sta spingendo i porti verso modelli di economia circolare e riduzione dell’impronta di carbonio. Senza contare la geopolitica digitale: esiste un dibattito serrato per il controllo delle piattaforme e degli algoritmi che gestiscono la logistica; i porti devono digitalizzarsi per migliorare l’efficienza, ma anche per difendersi da minacce cyber. In Italia, poi, la sfida è anche normativa, con la transizione verso il modello dei “Porti SpA” e l’implementazione dei progetti legati al PNRR per modernizzare la governance e le infrastrutture fisiche. Gli analisti del settore concordano che i porti saranno chiamati ad affrontare delle sfide nuove, dalla situazione geopolitica globale a mantenere una dimensione di sostenibilità in tutta la loro funzione polivalente e soprattutto nell’innovazione energetica. I tre ambiti che un sistema portuale si trova ad affrontare riguardano l’elettrificazione dei porti, l’uso di nuovi combustibili marittimi e l’economia circolare. Senza dimenticare l’impatto del sistema EU-ETS sul trasporto marittimo europeo e la crescente rivalità tra gli Stati Uniti e la Cina per un nuovo dominio mondiale; nessun porto è escluso da queste sfide, sia esso europeo, africano, asiatico, cinese o americano. L’attuale crisi energetica e geopolitica pone tutti i sistemi portuali in primo piano, ricordando che il mondo – con la sua globalizzazione – continua a dipendere dalle navi, stretti marini, petrolio, gas, fertilizzanti, metalli, cantieri navali, porti e catene logistiche. Lo Stretto di Hormuz è parte importante del commercio marittimo mondiale di petrolio, gas naturale liquefatto, prodotti raffinati, sostanze chimiche, fertilizzanti, zolfo e alluminio; la sua chiusura parziale o totale non incide solo sul mercato energetica, ma anche sull’economia globale; i prezzi delle suddette materie trasportate diventano volatili incidendo sulla pianificazione logistica delle aziende e delle compagnie di navigazione. Pensiamo per un attimo anche al settore delle costruzioni navali: la crisi attuale sta influenzando il settore per la carenza di vernici, lubrificanti e altri derivati petroliferi, per cui molti cantieri navali – specie quelli asiatici – sono in difficoltà. Gli ordini di nuove navi fanno slittare i tempi consegna e non di giorni, ma di anni, con la Cina, Corea del Sud e Giappone che con i rispettivi cantieri soffrono interruzioni di forniture industriali e che ne limitano il rinnovo delle flotte. La crisi geopolitica, l’uscita degli Emirati Arabi Uniti dall’Opec, gli Stati Uniti che si pongono come fornitore ‘unico’ di energia alternativa per Europa e Asia, con esportazioni record di petrolio greggio e prodotti raffinati; una sicurezza energetica che non dipende più solo dalla disponibilità fisica della risorsa, ma anche da possibili decisioni di politica nazionale. La Cina, in questo scenario, mantiene tassi di crescita rilevanti per la sua economia grazie alle esportazioni, all’industria manifatturiera avanzata e agli investimenti industriali. La crescita cinese si basa sulla produzione industriale, la robotica, i veicoli elettrici, le batterie e la produzione ad alto valore, mantenendo una posizione centrale nel commercio marittimo globale. L’Europa, da parte sua, deve ancora pianificare una risposta strategica: Bruxelles pensa che competere con Stati Uniti e Cina occorra aziende più forti, più investimenti e maggiore autonomia strategica, senza considerare che in settori strategici come energia, difesa, tecnologia e infrastrutture è richiesta una regolamentazione più ‘agile’ e più sicurezza economica fra Stati membri UE. L’unica risposta che la Commissione offre – riconoscendo che non esiste una soluzione finanziaria oggi – è quella dell’elettrificazione, del rafforzamento dell’energia nucleare, dell’espansione delle rinnovabili, delle batterie e delle interconnessioni, e la riduzione della dipendenza dai combustibili fossili. Per i porti, la Commissione europea sottolinea di migliorare il livello di qualità dei loro servizi, in un ambiente di diversificazione e intermodalità, senza avvertire che in un contesto globale più politicizzato e incerto, il settore portuale marittimo sta tornando al centro dell’economia mondiale, con le professioni a terra e in mare in continua evoluzione. Abele Carruezzo Prof. di Navigazione e Trasporti Marittimi
→ Apri originale
Italy, Croatia, Montenegro and Slovenia Join Together to Capture the Global Heart with a Breathtaking Victory as New Adriatic Sea Travel Infrastructure Delivers a Majestic Milestone for Future Soul Stirring Travel - Travel And Tour World
📰 Travel And Tour World 📅 2026-05-04 en
Italy, Croatia, Montenegro and Slovenia Join Together to Capture the Global Heart with a Breathtaking Victory as New Adriatic Sea Travel Infrastructure Delivers a Majestic Milestone for Future Soul Stirring Travel Travel And Tour World
→ Apri originale
Idrogeno su strada: test al via tra Gruber Logistics e Scania - Ship2Shore
📰 Ship2Shore Media 📅 2026-05-04 it Clima · decarbonizzazione
Idrogeno su strada: test al via tra Gruber Logistics e Scania Ship2Shore
→ Apri originale
I'm a Google Maps power user — here are 10 tips and features I can't live without
📰 TechRadar 📅 2026-05-04 en
After using Google's popular mapping app for the best part of two decades, I've learned a thing or two — here are my top tips and features.
There’s a strong case to be made forGoogle Mapsbeing the single best smartphone app around. Yes,even on iPhone. Since it launched on mobile in 2008, Google has spent the past two decades improving its mapping service, with new features, visual overhauls, and, of course, the introduction of AI. I’ve been using Google Maps on smartphones since the app first launched, and over those 18 years, I’ve witnessed these changes first-hand. It’s been an invaluable travel companion as I’ve ventured around the world, but in 2026, Google Maps is so much more than a simple mapping app. Maps can remember where you parked, show you the weather pretty much anywhere, double as a travel guide, and even take you back in time. Satellite view, navigation, and transit information are well known by now; I don't need to go over the basics. But here's a list of ways I use Google Maps to enhance my life. Google Maps is my first port of call when it comes to planning a work trip or vacation. Rather than head to a search engine or the likes ofGeminiorChatGPT, I find the mapping service a wholly encompassing experience. Zooming in on the area where I want to stay or explore, I use the handy shortcut buttons just below the search bar to display hotels or restaurants nearby. Google’s comprehensive business listings, complete with user reviews, provide a detailed breakdown of what’s available, and filter settings allow me to narrow down the options to those that interest me — all while seeing where they are on the map. You can even view hotel prices and availability, and book table reservations at restaurants from Google Maps. Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more. During a recent visit to Miami, for instance, Maps helped me plan a four-stop burger tour around Wynwood, with all the joints within a five-minute walk of our hotel. Seeing them all on the map in relation to our hotel, and with easy access to reviews, made the planning process easy. To make sure your pre-trip research isn’t forgotten, use the Lists feature to flag the places you’ve found. Tap a location of interest, and in the card that pops up, you’ll see a little bookmark icon. Tap that, and you’ll be able to add the location to one or more Lists. Google offers some pre-made lists, including 'Want to go' and 'Starred places', but you can also create your own. ‘Want to go’ is self-explanatory, and is what I use when planning a trip. It pops a green flag marker on all the locations you add to the list, making them easily viewable when you zoom in on the area in Maps. And once I’ve visited places, I move the ones that really stood out to me to a List I created called “Visited”. This gives you a personal history of your travels plotted directly on the map, and allows me to return to the places I really enjoyed if I were to visit the area again in the future. And these Lists can go further, too: you can add a note to a location you add to a List. While planning a trip to New York City in 2027, I’ve added Rudy’s Bar & Grill to my 'Want to go' list. However, I know once the trip rolls around next year, I will have forgotten why I flagged this spot — so by adding a note saying “With every beer, you get a free hot dog,” I know I’ll be primed once I arrive in Manhattan. The ability to download offline maps is no secret, but if you’re not aware of this feature, it’s not overtly obvious when using Google Maps. It is, however, massively useful when traveling abroad and you don’t fancy paying extortionate roaming charges. I always download the map for the areas I’ll be visiting, as I can’t always guarantee mobile signal, or whether my mobile plan will cover roaming. I’ve been able to save whole cities (including New York, Bangkok, and London) for offline use, and even multiple Caribbean islands in a single cache. Not everywhere is available to download offline, though. South Korea isn’t, for example. While not all functionality is possible with offline maps, you can use driving navigation and location search with the downloads without the need for an internet connection. To get to this feature, tap your profile picture in Google Maps, then tap ‘Offline maps’. Speaking of Google Maps’ in-car navigation — which has been a lifesaver on more than one occasion when I’ve been driving at home and abroad — you can further customize your experience. Diving into the settings to set the fuel your vehicle uses (gas, diesel, hybrid, electric), will allow Google Maps to better plan driving routes for you based on fuel efficiency and — in the case of EVs — charging stops. In the US, you can even tell Maps the exact make and model of your vehicle for even more accurate trip calculations, such as estimated battery usage for EVs. You can take the vehicle customization a step further too, with the ability to change the blue navigation arrow to a car icon. Google Maps offers eight different car models (plus five bikes) and eight different colors for a fun, personalized experience. A feature we love in our family is trip sharing. If I’m on the long drive home and using Google Maps for navigation, I can share my route with my partner, who can view my real-time progress, including my phone’s battery percentage, departure time, and estimated time of arrival. It’s easy to do — just start navigation in Maps, swipe the navigation card up, tap 'Share trip progress', and then select the contact you want to share with. I came across this feature accidentally during a recent long road trip, where I was slightly panicking that my phone battery was getting low and the USB port in my car had decided to stop charging. Navigation in Google Maps can be power hungry, and on long journeys, your phone will likely need a top-up. However, as I fumbled with my phone, I knocked the power key, which locked the handset. To my surprise, myGoogle Pixel 10 Procontinued to show navigation on the lock screen — albeit in black and white and with limited details compared to the full-fat experience. But it was a game-changer. Battery consumption was reduced, and I was able to make it home without my phone running flat. At the time of writing, lock screen navigation is only available on theGoogle Pixel 10series of handsets, but here’s hoping Google rolls it out more widely in the future. Vast parking lots can be challenging for the old memory. Great swathes of asphalt stretching far into the distance, each row of vehicles looking nearly identical to the last. I've found myself scratching my head at numerous locations when trying to remember where in a massive theme park or sports complex lot I left my car. Thankfully, Google Maps has come to my rescue on more than one occasion, with the ability to automatically drop a pin when it detects you’ve reached your destination and parked up. The small, circular ‘P’ icon it leaves on the map might look unassuming, but it can save you a lot of time and stress when returning to your vehicle. Look out for a prompt at the end of your navigated journey asking if you want maps to remember where you parked, or go to Settings > Notifications > Getting around > Parking Location. If you’re thinking about heading to the beach for the day and are checking out possible shorelines in Maps, you can also view the weather and air quality for a location without leaving the app. Zoom in on an area, and a weather icon will appear in the corner of the card at the bottom of the screen. Tap on this, and you’ll see the 24-hour forecast and air quality for that spot. I’m a sucker for a nostalgia trip, and combine that with a geeky obsession for maps (I have a geography degree after all), and Google Maps can end up stealing hours of my day as I take a step back in time with two features I just love. First up is Timeline, which has been around for a while. If you allow it, Google Maps can record your movements and save them in a calendar view. This is perfect if you’re trying to remember that really cool bar you stumbled into on a whim six months ago while on vacation in Rome, Italy, but can’t for the life of you remember what it was called or where in the city it was. A quick hop into Timeline, find the date in the calendar view, and you’ll get an itinerary breakdown of your movements that day so you can retrace your steps. As someone who enjoys digging into data and recounting previous excursions, I love this feature — but this level of tracking won’t be for everyone. You can turn Timeline tracking off by going to Settings > Location and Privacy > Timeline. The second time travel feature is a newer addition and is part of Street View. Enable this first-person view of a road, and you’ll see there’s an option to 'See more dates'. From here, you’ll be offered up the snapshots taken by Google’s Street View vehicles over the years — with some locations going back two decades. It’s fascinating to look at how areas have changed over the years. How many of my tips and features did you already know about? I'd love to hear how you use Google Maps — let me know your favorite tricks in the comments below. Follow TechRadar on Google Newsandadd us as a preferred sourceto get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button! And of course you can alsofollow TechRadar on TikTokfor news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us onWhatsApptoo. John has been a technology journalist for more than a decade, and over the years has built up a vast knowledge of the tech industry. He’s interviewed CEOs from some of the world’s biggest tech firms, visited their HQs, and appeared on live TV and radio, including Sky News, BBC News, BBC World News, Al Jazeera, LBC, and BBC Radio 4. You must confirm your public display name before commenting Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
→ Apri originale
Flows of justice? Situating environmental justice in urban river restoration
📰 Plos.org 📅 2026-05-04 en
The environmental justice (EJ) movement in the United States has long focused on water quality due to the threats that polluted surface and groundwaters pose to human health in historically marginalized communities. Recently, several advocacy groups, state ag…
The environmental justice (EJ) movement in the United States has long focused on water quality due to the threats that polluted surface and groundwaters pose to human health in historically marginalized communities. Recently, several advocacy groups, state agencies, and community-based organizations throughout the US have been working to rehabilitate urban rivers towards ecological and hydrological functioning through riparian and instream habitat improvements, channel modification, bank stabilization, dam removal, and other interventions. Many of these projects are attempting to integrate EJ concepts and practices into their river restoration efforts to make the project design, implementation, and outcomes more equitable and participatory. The goal of this paper is to examine how different elements of EJ–procedural, distributive, and recognitional understandings of justice–are (or are not) being integrated into restoration efforts across several urban settings. Employing a combination of textual analysis, semi-structured interviews, and participant observation, we examine cases drawn from cities participating in the Urban Waterways Federal Partnership program, an initiative coordinated through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that highlights justice as a critical component of successful urban stream restoration. This study’s central question is how the discourse and aspirations of EJ are shaping contemporary efforts at urban river restoration. Drawing on three study sites—projects on the Grand River (MI), the Bronx River (NY), and the Los Angeles River (CA)—our findings suggest that EJ is being incorporated into urban river restoration projects in the United States in innovative ways, most visibly through procedural and distributive justice initiatives. We also find evidence of progress towards articulating and achieving recognitional justice, but these achievements are particularly challenging in cities with historical legacies of institutional racism, raising questions about the limits of environmental restoration projects to address structural inequities in an urban context. Citation:Sneddon CS, Fox CA, Magilligan FJ, Bramsen AL (2026) Flows of justice? Situating environmental justice in urban river restoration. PLOS Water 5(5): e0000302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302 Editor:Pamela Giselle Katic, University of Greenwich Natural Resources Institute, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND Received:September 2, 2024;Accepted:March 5, 2026;Published:May 4, 2026 Copyright:© 2026 Sneddon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability:All data are within the manuscript itself. Funding:Grant awarded by the Dartmouth College Rockefeller Center for Public Policy to CS, CF, and FM (Award# 11-16-2022). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. As Robert Bullard wrote in his now classic monograph “Dumping in Dixie”, access to clean water is a major part of the environmental justice (EJ) movement in the United States [1]. Bullard’s initial focus addressed surface and groundwater contamination near Superfund and Brownfield sites that have been historically located near politically and economically marginalized communities of color largely in rural areas. Research on water and environmental justice over the past several decades in the United States has accordingly focused on how communities of color, low-income communities, and Indigenous communities are disproportionately exposed to contaminated sources of surface and groundwater and uneven access to clean drinking water [2,3]. Recent events underscore the environmental injustices that orbit around race, class, and water; a tragic example is the Flint, Michigan water crisis of the early 2010s, where immediate and long-term decisions by state officials, combined with decades of institutional racism, led to the dangerous exposure to unsafe drinking water by Black citizens of Flint [4]. While concerns over water quality remain an important academic and public focus, research on efforts to rehabilitate healthy and ecologically intact waterways through biophysical interventions that are attentive to the aspirations of EJ is far less common, particularly in the US context. Given that a growing number of advocacy groups, federal agencies, city governments, and community-based organizations throughout the US are working to rehabilitate rivers towards some degree of ecological and hydrological functioning [5,6], studies of how and why such efforts are integrating EJ into their initiatives are imperative. River restoration in the United States is a big business, with more than a $1 billion a year directed towards planning, implementation, and monitoring of restoration activities [7,8]. These efforts can be triggered by regulatory concerns to meet federal requirements concerning clean water via the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requirements, the need to generate restoration credits in the evolving market-based approaches to restoration, and to enhance riverine aesthetics to spur economic renewal in urban settings. Examples of restorative interventions include riparian and instream revegetation, channel modification, floodplain re-connectivity, and dam removal, among other techniques [9]. Many restoration projects are also working explicitly to integrate EJ concepts and practices into the project design, implementation, and outcomes of river restoration, and asking crucial questions regarding who will benefit from projects’ anticipated outcomes and who should be involved in decision-making [10]. These concerns are particularly cogent in US cities, where decades of segregation, racist zoning regulations, and other sources of political-economic marginalization have resulted in greater exposure and proximity to degraded and altered rivers for low-income neighborhoods and communities of color. River restoration efforts in cities, beyond “clean-up” initiatives, have long been neglected by government agencies and conservation organizations, who have perceived urban stream restoration as too complicated or too expensive due to the highly altered nature of the waterways [11]. Worldwide, urban river restoration is thus increasingly seen as a priority by planners, scientists, and advocacy organizations due, in part, to historical patterns of infrastructure development and channel modification in cities [6,12,13]. In recognition of these challenges, the EPA launched the Urban Waters Federal Partnership in conjunction with 15 federal agencies in 2011. Its core mission is to “help urban and metropolitan areas, particularly those that are under-served or economically distressed, connect with their waterways and work to improve them” [14]. The program now encompasses 21 partnerships located in cities across the United States. While the literature on the Urban Waters Partnership website does not explicitly mention EJ, nearly all the partner collectives–typically comprising non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in coalition with community groups, businesses, and state and local government agencies–explicitly include EJ as part of their goals and activities. Yet what EJ might imply for how urban river restoration is designed and carried out is less clear. In contrast, scholars of EJ have long recognized the need to incorporate multiple dimensions of justice—including distributive (focused on how the outcomes of an intervention are distributed), procedural (who has a voice in decision making), and, more recently, recognitional (how cultural difference and historical processes of marginalization among different social groups are acknowledged and addressed)—into investigations of how environmental “goods” and “bads” are distributed throughout society [15]. Yet what does environmentally just urban river restoration entail? We see a vital need for examining not only how EJ is being integrated into urban river restoration (URR) efforts, but also how the multiple dimensions of EJ–distributive, procedural, recognition–are being specifically addressed (or not) within these initiatives. This paper investigates ongoing efforts in the United States to simultaneously rehabilitate the biophysical integrity of urban rivers while integrating multiple dimensions of environmental justice into the decision-making processes and activities of urban river restoration. We focus our central questions on the Bronx River (NY), the Grand River (MI), and the Los Angeles River (CA). We ask the following: To address these questions, we next review the literature on urban river restoration and how it aligns with contemporary deliberations on the different dimensions of EJ. We trace research within URR as it evolved from an initial focus on the management aspects of restoration, particularly the appropriate restorative techniques, to more recent calls to include social dimensions within URR activities. Second, we lay out our methods and methodology, detailing the criteria for case selection and offering details on how data collection and analysis were conducted. Third, we present our findings from URR projects in three study sites—the Bronx River (NY), the Grand River (MI), and the Los Angeles River (CA)—to highlight the ways in which the different dimensions of EJ are being integrated (or not) into specific activities associated with river restoration. We then turn to a discussion of our main findings, summarizing the accomplishments and ongoing challenges of URR in the US and elsewhere, focusing in particular on how a multidimensional understanding of EJ might be more effectively integrated into the design and implementation of restoration projects. Finally, we conclude with a brief summary and some potential areas of future research. At present, the world’s rivers and streams are confronting pressures from altered flows, climate change impacts, multiple forms of pollution, threats to aquatic biota, and accelerating rates of water extraction. In combination, these ongoing impacts make the biophysical status of the world’s waterways a significant and persistent problem. Numerous scholars, policy makers, environmental advocates and civil society organizations have promoted river restoration as vital to nature-society relations at multiple spatial scales [9,16,17] and, as mentioned above, these efforts have recently turned to urban waterways. In spite of a growing literature on urban river restoration (URR), there is increasing realization that the field of URR, both in theory and practice, has in many cases avoided or given scant attention to concerns over environmental justice (EJ).While a range of authors have detailed the multiple dimensions of justice that characterize both scholarship and advocacy in EJ [15,18–22], we focus on distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice, three of the most critical and frequently mentioned types of justice discussed in relation to EJ. Distributivejustice—similar to the concept of equity—deals with the outcomes of decision making and within EJ is concerned primarily with how environmental abuses or amenities are distributed across diverse social groups. In the context of river restoration, it directs attention to whether or not the outcomes of projects (e.g., enhanced ecological functioning, recreational amenities, and economic opportunities) are distributed fairly to all affected urban residents. Although outside the scope of our study, distributive justice in urban river restoration is also concerned with the possibility of green gentrification, and recent research highlights how improvements to urban river corridors can in some cases contribute to the displacement of low-income and minoritized residents [23,24].Proceduraljustice deals with whether or not all actors have the capacity and ability to engage in decision-making processes regarding a particular environmental project. Just procedures within river restoration might include comprehensive awareness raising campaigns of project plans, wide-scale participation in project design and implementation by diverse community organizations, influence over a project’s particular contours and how funding is directed, and other inclusive processes that ensure that the voices of communities affected by the project are not only heard but integrated into planning procedures [5]. Concerns overrecognitionaljustice highlight that some social groups are frequently overlooked as potential participants in environmental decision making, and that their specific worldviews and historical experiences are often ignored. Such misrecognition is often connected to historical patterns of marginalization based on social categories such as indigeneity, race, or socio-economic status [25]. In waterway restoration, a failure to recognize the processes that have alienated minoritized communities from rivers can confound efforts to promote justice purely on distributive and procedural grounds [18,26]. Towards the turn of the 20th century, an array of scholars, planners, government agencies, environmental groups, and community organizations in the US began to call more urgently for programs and funding that targeted river restoration, including urban waterways [27]. A key question at this time was what kinds of hydrologic and ecological interventions were technically feasible, economically efficient, and supported by governmental decision-makers [28,29]. These efforts tended to be expert-driven and reliant on scientific knowledge, focusing on biophysical goals such as reduced channel erosion and enhanced channel stability [30]. Many URR projects in the US during this period initially centered on four types of intervention: stormwater management, bank stabilization, channel modification and grade control, and riparian revegetation [29]. There was also growing awareness of a broader toolkit of restoration interventions—both physical and regulatory—that included enhanced fish passage, dam removal, floodplain buyout programs, and more [9]. The social dimensions of waterway restoration, if included at all, revolved around how to effectively mobilize government agencies at federal, state, and local levels to prioritize URR, and how to raise awareness of and support for restoration among undifferentiated urban populaces [28]. Many URR efforts along these lines reflected the interest and goals of government agencies, environmental organizations, and/or other interest groups, to the neglect of less powerful actors [31]. Recent research and practice in URR, however, foreground the social dimensions of environmental projects, emphasize how marginalized communities creatively engage with and even subvert the distributive and procedural aspects of EJ, and, albeit more rare, pay attention to the important role that recognitional justice plays in repair of urban waterways. Several studies clearly show that many URR initiatives in the US, while well-funded and technically sound, are often hampered by a failure to sufficiently engage all stakeholders in project planning and implementation—including low-income communities and communities of color [10,12,13]. Work grounded in political ecology focuses on the political and economic processes operating across several spatial scales that shape restoration efforts in ways that hamper effective integration of EJ elements. For example, efforts to restore Milwaukee’s Kinnickinnic River, a heavily degraded waterway running through largely Black and low-income neighborhoods in the city’s most heavily industrialized zones, are ostensibly aware of the need to enhance procedural justice. Yet Holifield & Schuelke [32] conclude that efforts by project advocates to make the initiative more participatory occur through procedures that are “carefully managed and typically oriented toward building consensus” while glossing over conflicts among different urban actors that arise from decades of environmental racism. Similarly, Kimari and Parish [33] trace how urban river restoration projects in Toronto and Nairobi give more weight to city authorities’ concerns for economic “revitalization” than to the goals of residents who interact with rivers on a daily basis. One of the clear findings of such work is that URR efforts will always be influenced by urban politics that shape outcomes and procedures in ways that often reflect the interests of politically and economically dominant actors, and thus limit opportunities to achieve distributive and procedural forms of justice. In addition to scholarship highlighting procedural and distributive justice in URR, recent studies also direct attention to recognitional justice, which is arguably more complicated to achieve in urban river restoration projects since it implies acknowledging (and ultimately undoing) decades of environmental injustices foisted on minoritized communities and the institutional structures that hinder transformative changes. Tribal involvement in river restoration projects is a particularly apt example of recognitional justice. For example, river restoration projects on the Elwha, the Klamath, Penobscot, and Ottaway, among others, are driven by recognition of how colonialism and other historical injustices have ruptured Tribal relationships with their rivers. Driven by Indigenous advocates, these projects have to some degree restored autonomous decision-making and legal rights to Tribes while acknowledging their cultural, spiritual, and historical relationships with their rivers (see [34]). In another vein, a recent case study in Atlanta highlights the strategies used by marginalized groups to counter the political and economic weight of state and corporate actors and, in doing so, redefining EJ on their own terms. The South River Watershed Alliance (SAWA), composed of residents from the “highly segregated, majority Black areas” of southeast Atlanta, started as an effort to mitigate sewage overflows contaminating these neighborhoods. During workshops with government agencies in the early 2010s, members of SAWA realized “framing strategy explicitly in terms of EJ seemed to promise little more than token representation of Black residents without meaningful decision-making authority over development affecting their community” ([35], 1598). Perceiving institutionalized efforts at promoting EJ as a script that preserves “business as usual”, SAWA representatives instead adopted a new strategy that affirmed a “right to nature” through canoe outings and other recreational activities even though these had been prohibited by regulations due to poor water quality. The re-framing of river restoration as “ecological appreciation” proved far more effective in mobilizing “middle- and working class suburban Black communities” in southeast Atlanta to engage politically in the project in support of its distributive and procedural aims ([35], 1599). The Atlanta case underscores that successfully integrating EJ concerns into repairing urban waterways often hinges on how community-based organizations advocating for equitable outcomes and recognition of their unique perspectives on the meaning of “restoration” engage with state actors. Indeed, this points to a recent debate in the geographical literature on the role of state actors in promoting or inhibiting goals of EJ advocated by the hundreds of communities across the US. Some critical EJ scholars argue that activists and their allies working within state institutions (i.e., regulations, bureaucracies) to promote EJ have largely failed to improve the socio-environmental conditions confronted by communities of color and low-income communities disproportionately exposed to environmental insults [36–39]. Under this view, structural racism is so deeply embedded within state institutions, EJ activists must start “seeing the state as an adversary that must be confronted in a manner similar to industry” for meaningful progress towards EJ to occur ([38], 530). In a rejoinder, a recent overview of how to situate the state within EJ theory and practice argues that ultimately the harshest critiques of the state as an institution for fostering EJ underplay the tangible ways that EJ advocates are able to effectively engage state actors and institutions in different kinds of justice-oriented projects. Such critiques also underplay the diverse characteristics of state actors that make them alternately hostile, neutral, or actively supportive towards EJ goals [40]. The Atlanta case explicitly supports the notion that EJ activists are able to effectively pursue EJ in terms of distributive outcomes, fair procedures, and recognition of past injustices in their community by creative engagements with state actors. In addition, research on dam removal underscores that state workers across various jurisdictions often act in ways that support restoration activities and undermine dominant discourses that allow for the inclusion of more justice-oriented perspectives [41]. Although the academic literature on URR highlights the vital need for simultaneously repairing urban waterways and incorporating elements of distributive, procedural, and recognitional elements of EJ, these discussions have been less attuned to how the different dimensions of EJ specifically shape restoration activities. Moreover, this scholarship has not sufficiently addressed the ways in which the integration of EJ goals might bolster (or hinder) efforts at rehabilitating urban waterways in part because there is no blueprint for successful integration, and the scope of a given project may be too constrained by funding, politics, or existing infrastructure. These restoration efforts also occur in differing urban settings where the political and historical contingencies may be unique thereby limiting a uniform combination of EJ and restoration. In addition, there remains a compelling argument for interrogating how state actors become enrolled within specific projects which can perhaps serve as an important template for future efforts. In the cases examined below, government officials play myriad roles, frequently serving as sources of funding, scientific expertise, project design, and other functions [41]. This paper uses three study sites to illuminate the multiple ways that discourses and objectives related to EJ are being integrated into urban river restoration in the United States. In a preliminary phase of the research, we initiated Google News alerts in 2021 using the keywords “river restoration” and “rivers and environmental justice” with both alerts continuing to the present. In a preliminary analysis of urban river restoration initiatives in the US, we became aware of the Urban Waterways Federal Partnership, an interagency program launched in 2011 and coordinated through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Of the 21 projects supported through the Partnership, we identified three study sites for more detailed investigation according to the following criteria: projects that maintained a significant focus on biophysical interventions (e.g., dam removal, riparian and instream revegetation, channel modification) as opposed to a water quality focus; and initiatives that explicitly identified environmental justice as a project emphasis. We also focused on projects that were at different stages of formal planning and implementation in order to highlight how conceptions of EJ, and its potential influence on restoration activities, might change over time. Our eventual cases—the Bronx River in the Bronx (NY), the Grand River in Grand Rapids (MI), and the Los Angeles River in Los Angeles (CA)—are as described below at quite different stages, ranging from over two decades of actual restoration activities (Bronx River) to years of planning with little implementation (Grand River) and early planning stages and no implementation (LA River). Lead organizations in all three cases explicitly state the need to integrate the principles of EJ into their restoration activities. For example, one aim of the Bronx & Harlem River UWFP is “to help overburdened and underserved Bronx communities reconnect to their waterways, reduce the negative impacts of urbanization on both water quality and human health, and restore impacted riverfronts while pursuing environmental justice.” Similarly, the Grand River/Grand Rapids UWFP singles out environmental justice as a key Workplan Initiative [42]. While less prominent in official documentation, the LA River Master Plan includes several grassroots EJ organizations as advisory partners [43], especially local community groups who fear the potential of green gentrification. In addition, these urban waterways are all prominent symbols of their cities, and historically have all been examples of the “urban stream syndrome” described by aquatic scientists as waterways subject to decades of extreme alteration and pollution levels [44,45]. Although all three are the focal points of comprehensive restoration initiatives, these efforts are at quite different phases of design and implementation. After several decades of programs of varying intensity, proponents of restoration of the Bronx River have accomplished many of their initial goals in terms of reduced pollution, ecologically and aesthetically enhanced riparian zones, and re-connecting many abutting neighborhoods with the river. The Grand River, in contrast, has for over 15 years been planning an array of interventions to rehabilitate the river for both biophysical and economic goals, but has yet to implement actual restoration actions. Restoration of the Los Angeles River is still largely in the planning and design phases. These cases thus afford the opportunity to explore how distributive, procedural and recognitional justice principles are or are not being effectively integrated into URR initiatives at different moments in project histories. We gathered information regarding each case initially through a review of regional and local media sources (newspapers, town meeting minutes, engineering reports, etc.). Having received CPHS (Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects) exemption from our institution’s IRB (STUDY00032760), our team also carried out multiple semi-structured interviews (SSIs) with project participants (seeS1 Text), primarily for the Grand Rapids (GR) case and to a lesser extent from the Bronx River site. In our original emails to potential interviewees, we mentioned that we were interested in their involvement and perspective on the dam removal process at their site, especially the ways that issues of environmental justice had been incorporated into the restoration process or in what ways it was being considered (or not). In all instances, the interviewees (all adults) agreed by email to be interviewed, although for issues of confidentiality we do not use any names. This confidentiality also prevents us from posting personal data related to the identities of our research participants. We spent several days in Grand Rapids in July 2023 where we interviewed a representative of the Mayor’s office; two staff members of the local Museum that often sponsors key meetings of affected stakeholders; two restoration advocates who launched the dam removal restoration project; a member of the GR Chamber of Commerce involved in the pioneering public-private partnership helping fund restoration; and two staff members of Grand Rapids Whitewater (GRWW), which has become the lead NGO for governing restoration activities. In addition, we interviewed two advocates for GR’s Black community who have been mobilizing efforts for the restoration plan to be more inclusive. In August 2023 we interviewed via Zoom an academic who is a member of the Latinx community in GR and involved in restoration governance. For the Bronx River, one of the authors attended a weekend event sponsored by the Bronx River Alliance in late August 2023, where they conducted semi-structured interviews and participant observation of educational and community-building activities in coordination with the Bronx River Alliance. One team member attended an online meeting organized by the Bronx River Alliance in June 2024 discussing the updated Bronx River Intermunicipal Watershed Management Plan (IWMP). For the LA River, we focused on secondary information (e.g., websites, published statements from key NGOs) in addition to a wide range of media reports since the rolling out of the LA River Master Plan in 1996 (it was updated in 2022). Although our investigation of restoration activities in the case of LA River does not include interviews or participant observation, we relied on the extensive information sources available through secondary literature, public statements from multiple stakeholders, planning documents, and news and other media sources. Thus, while our data concerning the LA River may not be as finely grained in terms of actors’ perspectives, there is sufficient information concerning discussions of EJ within restoration activities that offer valuable insights into our core research questions (see above). All the data for all cases is either contained within the article and/or alluded to in the appropriate source(s) in the bibliography. We queried interviewees in Grand Rapids and the Bronx about basic information on the history, management design, funding, and implementation of their restoration initiatives, as well as each participant’s views on how EJ objectives were being integrated into the project. We integrated and coded this qualitative information using ATLAS.ti, a commonly used computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). In our coding, we highlighted those themes emerging from project documentation, newspaper articles, and interviews that identified how distributive, procedural, and/or recognitional justice was manifesting within each study site’s URR efforts (seeS1 Table). Each instance of distributive, procedural, and/or recognitional justice was identified in project documents, media sources, and interview transcripts based on definitions of those terms (see above) in the academic literature and coded as a relevant variant of the broader category of EJ. These codes were then analyzed in relation to the actor or actors drawing on this form of EJ, the specific restoration activity being proposed (e.g., dam removal, expansion of riparian green spaces), and additional themes related to each study site. In line with our research questions, we also focused on the theme of barriers and opportunities to the different elements of EJ within URR projects. We used the Occurrence and Co-Occurrence function of ATLAS.ti as a way to organize, analyze, and generalize the data [46], which then served as prompts for use during the subsequent interviews. Restoring the Bronx River: “Bring the community in, because that’s the only way it’ll be sustainable” [SSI,BRA volunteer program assistant] Efforts to restore the Bronx River in New York City have by several measures yielded impressive results. Accomplishments include a decades-long clean-up of industrial and household waste and debris in the river’s channel and along its banks; improved water quality throughout the watershed; enhanced green spaces accessible to the North and South Bronx’s diverse neighborhoods; effective ecological management through plantings and invasive species removals; participatory planning and educational activities; and governance mechanisms involving the participation of over 80 community partners, businesses, and government agencies [47]. The Bronx River Alliance (BRA) has been the primary coordinating organization for stewardship of the Bronx River since the early 2000s, and the different principles of EJ–including distributive, procedural, and recognitional modes–are informing restoration design and implementation in a number of concrete ways [48] and were undertaken at a time when the tenets of EJ were less well-defined. These principles were forged and incorporated into river restoration through decades of tireless work undertaken by numerous community organizations and advocates of EJ, abetted through key government sponsorship and funding that, although not without challenges, explicitly recognizes the Bronx River as a vital community benefit. Restoration activities in the Bronx originated in the 1970s, initiated by community advocate Ruth Anderberg and NYPD Inspector Anthony Bouza, whose early advocacy for the river led to the creation in 1974 of the volunteer organization Bronx River Restoration. As Anderberg noted in 1979, “You couldn’t see the river for all the garbage that was in there – you could practically walk across it” [49]. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the BRR secured grants and political support from state and city agencies to continue the physical cleanup and focus on modest improvements in water quality, with an additional goal of seeing native fish species return to the river. Foreshadowing more explicit EJ movements in the 1990s, New York city officials in the 1980s recognized that the “river runs through communities with wide economic disparities, from affluent Westchester villages to South Bronx neighborhoods that are among the poorest in the country” [50]. There was thus at least some official acknowledgement that the river’s extremely poor condition in the South Bronx represented an environmental injustice. By the late 1990s, efforts to improve water quality and remove visible garbage from the river had proven reasonably successful, and the NYC parks commission launched a multi-year, $10 million effort to enhance and improve the river’s system of parks and greenways in the southern part of the watershed. This was significant because the South Bronx has historically been the site of multiple environmental injustices for the largely Black and Hispanic populations living near the river; it was “lined by industrial sites, highway overpasses and other emblems of the urban landscape” [51]. Under the coordination of BRR, several community organizations, government agencies, schools and local businesses formed the Bronx River Working Group in 1997 with community education and awareness raising centered on the need for river restoration at the center of their mission. In 2001, the Bronx River Working Group incorporated the Bronx River Alliance as a 501(c) [3] non-profit and the BRA has since been the driving actor in ongoing river monitoring, restoration and community programming. Their central goal is to transform the river into a “healthy ecological, recreational, educational, and economic resource for all communities through which the river flows” [47]. The goal of equitably distributing the multifaceted benefits of river restoration has thus been a crucial element of the BRA’s overall mission from its onset. One way the BRA builds procedural justice elements into their governance structures is through inclusion of community members and representatives of neighborhood associations within decision making bodies. For examples, local partners from riverine communities are embedded within all three teams of the Alliance– Greenway, Food Waste, and Ecology–which are co-chaired by community members. According to the BRA Community Outreach Coordinator, the aim of this level of participation is “to really serve as…steering committees for the work that the Bronx River Alliance” undertakes [SSI, 08/29/2023]. Serving as co-chairs “allows [community members] to really…help guide our priorities, and help guide the programming that we run” [SSI, Community Outreach Coordinator, 08/29/2023]. Encouraging this kind of community input has altered, for example, some of the Ecology Team’s priorities by promoting more nature walks, a direct response to community input. An online meeting on 4 June 2024 explicitly sought input from at-large community members throughout the Bronx concerning the Intermunicipal Watershed Management Plan (IWMP), an update to the 2010 IWMP; as one of the BRA conveners put it, “you know your areas and neighborhoods best” and can serve as the eyes and ears of the BRA for identifying issues and opportunities about restoration [PM, 06/04/2024]. One of the more singular aspects of the Bronx River Alliance’s work is the emergence of the Greenway Program, which has been a fulcrum for EJ-inspired collective action for over three decades. In the early 2000s, the Bronx River Working Group envisioned a 23-mile riverine corridor from the East River to the upper watershed’s Kensico Dam as a key component of the river’s overall restoration [15,52]. The guiding vision was focused on “community involvement in cleaning up and revealing a previously hidden river,” a plan that hinged crucially on “bottom up, grassroots political advocacy” in addition to securing sufficient funding ([53], 75–76). The parks eventually created under the umbrella of the greenway—including Concrete Plant Park, Starlight Park, and Hunts Point Riverside Park—were originally conceived in the early 2000s and were a direct response to the activities of community-based EJ organizations such as Banana Kelly, The Point CDC and Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice (YMPJ) [54],who successfully opposed the installation of a city-sponsored sewage treatment plant and a waste transfer station in predominantly Black neighborhoods of the South Bronx in the 1980s and 1990s [52]. These groups vociferously represented the interests of people of color and low-income neighborhoods in the planning and implementation of restoration activities. The popularity of the parks and the longstanding commitment of the BRA to procedural, distributive, and recognitional forms of EJ are directly linked to the sustained activities of these community-based organizations who prioritized EJ goals as central to just river restoration. The EJ campaigns in the early 1990s—that eventually led to expansion of green spaces—often assumed a confrontational stance toward government agencies, yet the architects of Bronx River restoration have also recognized the need for government involvement. As a result, government funding has been crucial to undertake restoration in a way that meets the varying needs of a large and heterogeneous group of communities and participants. River restoration in the South Bronx, a journalist points out, “illustrates how government, although it can be obstructionist and infuriating, is also indispensable to urban improvement” [55]. Former parks commissioner Adrian Benepe estimated that of the $700 million spent on Bronx parks during the administration of NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg (2002–2013), $100 million had “gone to the river and riverside parks;” additional money came into the effort from upper watershed towns such as Yonkers, White Plains, Scarsdale, and Greenburgh following legal settlements over pollution [55]. Most recently, the BRA (in conjunction with NYC Parks) received $10 million-award from the Department of Transportation for an expansion of the Greenway that will link Concrete Plant and Starlight Parks in the South Bronx, underscoring the vital importance of state funding [56]. The BRA’s educational activities and awareness-raising campaigns, particularly those focused on youth, are key expressions of distributive justice, ensuring that the benefits of a cleaner and rehabilitated riverine environment are shared equitably throughout the Bronx, and in particular in the historically disadvantaged communities of the South Bronx.Table 1gives a sense of the diversity and function of events scheduled to connect people to the river over a one-month period in 2024 and is representative of other events throughout a given year. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.t001 These kinds of activities serve multiple purposes, but perhaps none more so than raising awareness that the Bronx River is a community hub that can offer educational, recreational, environmental, and other kinds of benefits to anyone who wants to become involved. The work of the BRA then is simultaneously focused on equitably distributing the multiple benefits of river restoration throughout the watershed—but especially in the South Bronx region—and on prioritizing inclusionary activities. With regard to recognitional justice, the BRA and its partners in the city government realized that decades of marginalization of Black and Hispanic communities in the South Bronx required that any restoration activities acknowledge the past environmental injustices experienced by certain neighborhoods and their residents. Following decades of urbanization and industrialization, the river had become from the late 19thto the mid-20thcentury “a sink for dumping sewage, trash, and industrial waste” ([48], 4). By the 1950s and 1960s, loss of manufacturing jobs in the South Bronx combined with white flight to the suburbs of the northern portions of the watershed, as well as government inaction, created conditions where the largely non-white residents of the lower watershed were disproportionately exposed to all kinds of environmental ills. The Bronx River watershed thus has been and remains characterized by deep socio-economic and racial disparities [48]. The BRA clearly recognizes these disparities in their approach, and orients its activities and programming towards neighborhoods in the South Bronx where environmental injustices have historically been the most acute. Moreover, as mentioned above, struggles over EJ in the Bronx during the 1980s and 1990s were a formative element of the eventual institutionalization of the BRA and its activities. In summary, the BRA undertakes a wide range of activities, all of which to some extent are oriented towards expanding EJ goals. Procedurally, the BRA’s activities typically involve input from the communities most directly affected by past environmental insults as well as, importantly, those residents who stand to gain from increased environmental amenities and education campaigns. Over a decade ago, a NYT journalist aptly captured the ethos of the Bronx River restoration activities: …compared with headline-making projects in Manhattan and Brooklyn, the unexpected renaissance under way along the south end of the Bronx River flies largely below the radar. Park by park a patchwork of green spaces has been taking shape, the consequence of decades of grinding, grass-roots, community-driven efforts. For the environmentalists, educators, architects and landscape designers involved, the idea has not just been to revitalize a befouled waterway and create new public spaces. It has been to invest Bronx residents, for generations alienated from the water, in the beauty and upkeep of their local river [55]. Despite the measurable successes and general recognition that restoration activities on the Bronx River have attained through this overarching philosophy, there remain important constraints on these initiatives. For instance, comprehensive biophysical restoration of the watershed is most likely unattainable due to the highly urbanized character of the formerly forested basin. In addition, the presence of the Kensico Dam in the upper portion of the watershed in Westchester County (Fig 1) places significant limitations on achieving historical flows in the river. The transferable lessons of the Bronx River’s restoration can be heralded but may be somewhat limited as well. For example, the river’s rehabilitation in a way that prioritizes justice concerns has benefitted from the South Bronx’s long history of active EJ movements, which brought vital attention to the structural nature of White supremacy and environmental racism in the 1980s and 1990s [48]. Many facets of EJ, as a result, have been more fully integrated into the political and governing systems of NYC since the 2000s [57]. Overall, the two decades since the BRA’s creation have been characterized as a period when distributive, procedural, and recognition forms of EJ have been to a certain extent normalized within the organization’s operations and, importantly, in its relations to both government agencies and its partner organizations. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=1b243539f4514b6ba35e7d995890db1d). https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=1b243539f4514b6ba35e7d995890db1d). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.g001 The history of the Grand River in Grand Rapids (MI)— referred to as the Grand River corridor as it runs through the city’s downtown—is interwoven with histories of industrialization, demographic changes, and racial inequalities. The first dam on the Grand corridor was built in 1866 and in the following decades large boulders and rocks along the river bed were removed and used in local construction projects, resulting in the disappearance of the city’s namesake rapids by the early 20thcentury. The loss of the rapids was quickly followed by the construction of four low-head run-of-river dams (Fig 2) to help regulate water levels with the aim of using the river as a conduit for moving logs downstream. The vision of returning the rapids to the Grand River was first broached in 2008 by two kayaking enthusiasts, who envisioned removing the dams along the river’s downtown corridor and constructing a whitewater park with a standing wave that, taken together, would spur economic opportunity through increased tourism. As we detail below, the initial plan has expanded to include broader aims: economic revitalization of the city’s downtown; a watershed-scale project that includes green corridors and parks throughout the city and associated county; and linked projects to ensure that urban river restoration addresses EJ concerns. The discourses of EJ put forward by a range of actors over the years have influenced the project in various ways, and what was initially a project concerned primarily with restoring hydrologic functioning and creating recreational opportunities transformed into something different: a project where questions surrounding the equitable distribution of benefits of URR and giving previously marginalized groups a voice in governance of the project became amplified. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.g002 As in the Bronx case, historical contingencies have shaped how URR is engaging with different dimensions of EJ within efforts to rehabilitate the Grand River. Grand Rapids (GR) initially attracted Black Americans from the South during the Great Migration of the 1920s and 1930s for occupations in the lucrative furniture manufacturing sector [58]. However, like many cities in the upper Midwest, GR has had a predominantly White population throughout most of its settler history with upwards of 80 percent of the population being White (non-Hispanic) as recently as 1980. Following the “rust-belt” deindustrialization of the late 20thcentury wherein its overall population declined by 10 percent, Grand Rapids has slowly regained its population, reaching a level of just under 200,000 in the 2020 census. These gains have also led to an increasingly diverse population where 20 percent as of the early 2020s identifies as African-American and 16 percent as Latino/Hispanic. Despite the increasingly diverse demographics, the legacies of redlining and other forms of housing market discrimination, in addition to other forms of structural racism, have resulted in highly uneven population distribution based on race (Fig 3), which have important implications for how the benefits and costs of river restoration might be distributed. The Black community, for example, has experienced social and environmental injustices for decades. As emphasized by a local businesswoman and community organizer, “I’m a third generation here [in Grand Rapids]. And this is where we were redlined to over here [pointing to a map], so this is where black people had to live. Right. With all the contaminants from the river, from the factories, from the highway, so we’ve been surrounded by pollutants, the river was one of them” [SSI, 07/14/2023]. The African-American community was historically relegated to low-diversity, more distal neighborhoods (Fig 3); and even as the neighborhoods have become less segregated over time (Fig 3), the African-American population remains significantly removed from the river which has complicated efforts to generate restoration efforts more inclusive of the African-American community. Important to notice the greater diversity in the Black neighborhoods from 1990-2020 but still remaining more distal to the Grand River (Base layer from Mixed Metro (mixedmetro.us), Town Boundaries and Lakes from Michigan Open Data, Roads from US Census Bureau, Great Lakes Boundary from USGS). Important to notice the greater diversity in the Black neighborhoods from 1990-2020 but still remaining more distal to the Grand River (Base layer from Mixed Metro (mixedmetro.us), Town Boundaries and Lakes from Michigan Open Data, Roads from US Census Bureau, Great Lakes Boundary from USGS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.g003 For the past several years, restoration efforts have been overseen by a local non-profit organization, Grand Rapids Whitewater (GRWW), which has coordinated its programming and planning with key local and regional government institutions, including offices within the City of Grand Rapids, the Grand Valley Metropolitan Council (GVMC), the Grand Rapids Public Museum, Downtown Grand Rapids Incorporated (DGRI), the Grand Rapids Downtown Development Authority (GRDDA), and many others. Concerns over distributive and procedural justice were presumed to be present at the beginning of the project; as one of the co-founders of GRWW puts it, the project’s sponsors set out in the early years to “take into account as many people’s thoughts, science obviously leading the way, and see what we can accomplish that would be a win for as many people as possible” [SSI, 07/13/2023]. These early efforts became more institutionalized as the co-founders recognized their desire to improve kayaking conditions could lead to broader scale changes; “we realized that there was so much more going on in this river….For two years, we were kayakers, but then we became [...] river restoration advocates” [SSI, 07/13/2023]. After its creation in 2008, GRWW received a $25,000 grant from the GRDDA, and raised enough funds from local businesses and grassroots fundraising efforts to hire a consulting firm that confirmed most of the original riverbed was intact upstream of the Sixth Street Dam, and that contaminated sediments would not be a problem if dams were removed [59]. After an initial fundraising and networking period, in 2013 the Urban Waterways Federal Partnership program accepted the GRWW’s application to be part of the program, which gave the project “the official nod of legitimacy towards what we were trying to accomplish” [SSI, 07/13/2023]. This was also the period when City officials, GRWW, and their supporters began to more actively contemplate how EJ goals of distributive, procedural and recognitional justice might be better integrated into the design, implementation, and outcomes of the project. This was in part prompted by involvement with the EPA Urban Waterways program, which perceived efforts to rehabilitate urban rivers as a means to redress the unequal distribution of environmental harms—for example, polluted water and highly altered channel morphology—from the decades of neglect of urban rivers. The City government has been centrally involved in efforts to make river restoration more equitable and inclusive through other mechanisms. Since its creation in 2013, Downtown Grand Rapids Inc. (DGRI)—an organization that includes a range of government, private, and community leaders—has led efforts to “reestablish the Grand River as the draw to the city and region” [60] through a range of activities including developing plans for a recreational trail along the river, providing feedback on restoration activities, and improvements to An-Nab-Awen/Indian Mounds Park, a site of significant cultural importance to the Indigenous American Tribes in the region. A centerpiece of the city’s efforts is a community engagement project, known asGrand River Voices, which solicits input from residents to weigh in through virtual and in person events. It has also created a 15-person advisory board to help guide development of the equity framework. “Our community has a really ambitious plan to build a beautiful river corridor running through our community,” said the chief outcomes officer at DGRI. “It’s clear that all of the project partners in this work believe that building that beautiful river should benefit as many people as possible;” ultimately, “(w)e want to build a river for all, and the idea of this equity framework is really doing the deeper work to define what we mean by equity” (quoted in [59]). The River for All slogan was officially adopted by the city in 2017, and prompted efforts to enhance distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice through the Micro-Local Business Enterprise (MLBE) program initiated in July 2020. According to the city’s former Equity Analyst: By creating a program that is intentionally designed to decrease systemic barriers for businesses owned by women and people of color, we are allowing more voices to be brought to the table when it comes to growing and improving our city. Our vision for aRiver for Allstarts with these restoration projects and extends into the future recreation programming, educational resources, and ecological and cultural preservation in and along the Grand River…That means how can we imbed equity systemically? [61] The MLBE program currently includes 77 total companies across 34 industries including construction, landscaping and tourism. The newly registered businesses account for a 57 percent increase since July 2020 with many of the businesses being minority- and woman-owned [62]. By prioritizing businesses owned by women and people of color, the program seeks to distribute the substantial funds going towards river restoration more equitably. In addition, bringing atypical voices to urban planning and the acknowledgement of systemic barriers (i.e., racism and sexism) to economic participation, the program points to the need to advance both procedural and recognitional justice. Around the time of the launching of the MLBE program, the non-profit agency Grand River Network—which emerged from DGRI and the City government as part of Grand River Voices—began crafting the Grand River Equity Framework. The document’s attention to distributive and recognitional justice is overt: the “revitalization initiative represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to ensure future river-related programming, policies, and infrastructure benefit all Grand Rapidians, with a focus on those that have been disproportionately impacted by racial, environmental, economic, and other forms of injustice” [63]. The Equity Framework came as a direct response from community advocates who did not perceive that river restoration was being designed as equitably or inclusively as claimed in numerous project documents. Reflecting on the time when she first heard about restoration efforts in the early 2020s, a community organizer/entrepreneur recalled, “We’ve been amplifying our voice for a long time. It’s just that we haven’t been being heard.” This perspective was acknowledged by a representative of the Grand Rapids Office of Equity and Engagement: “We know that our communities of color are being left behind when it comes to development projects, engagement contracts, the outdoor industry as a whole. So, we have opportunity here to lead with equity” (quoted in [64]). As noted previously, the MLBE program launched by the city endeavors to directly address years of economic marginalization in Grand Rapids by prioritizing minority- and women-owned businesses for the construction work involved in improving the waterfront, and indeed for returning rapids to the river through the augmentation of gravel, rocks, and boulders. Yet this raises a dilemma in terms of how recognitional justice might be aligned with distributive and procedural justice. As explained by members of the Black community, historic patterns of racism in the city have meant that very few if any Black-owned businesses have the equipment, staff, and resources required to bid on and secure contracts for much of the large-scale construction work envisioned as part of the revitalization efforts. Thus, while efforts to distribute some of the economic benefits of river restoration more equitably are welcome, there is frustration that the historical processes of marginalization that prevent some social groups from taking advantage of economic opportunities have not been more explicitly recognized as barriers. Indeed, as relayed by a Kent County Commissioner (also an urban sociologist), “there’s been a kind of growing cynicism of certainly the Black community historically, but also Latinos that this [urban] development is uneven…that the people that are benefitting are the downtown interest groups, they’re using public funds to support these interest groups, but we don’t benefit [and] that is true historically” [SSI, 07/17/2023]. Thus, recent steps in the direction of recognitional justice are welcome, but many in the Black and Latino communities are taking a “wait and see” position. Perhaps the central way that Grand River restoration is working to integrate distributive, procedural, and recognitional forms of EJ is the vision—shared by nearly every participant we talked with—i to reconnect the river with the everyday lives of city residents. The aforementioned County Commissioner shared that the Grand has historically been “viewed as a dividing line for ethnicity and class and religion,” an informal barrier that in the early decades of industrialization separated the “Catholic/Irish/Lithuanian/Polish workers” on the Westside from the Heritage Hill neighborhood of industrialist mansions on the Eastside.” More recently, on “one side of the river, you got basically an African American community. On the other side of the river, you have essentially a Latino community;” many believe that within an inclusive and ambitious river restoration effort “there are opportunities to connect the two” [SSI, 07/17/2023]. This refrain is seconded by Mayor Rosalynn Bliss: “My hope is that as we restore the rapids, we’re also restoring this connectivity and that it will no longer be a divider” (as quoted in [65]). In this vision, the Grand River may become a central gathering place for its diverse community. To help deal with the spatial inequities such as the majority African-American community residing at some distance from the river (Fig 3) where restoration activities are concentrated, community leaders have been gathering funds to develop bike and hiking trails and expanded greenway spaces that will enhance access to the river front amenities for the more distal Black neighborhoods [66,67]. Furthermore, another UWFP stated goal—to expand economic opportunities—is accomplished via the creation of 1,500 one-time jobs, additional permanent annual jobs, and projected increased revenues of $15–19 million/year from new recreational activity. Accordingly, these economic opportunities are expected to help disenfranchised communities by propping up women- and minority-owned businesses as detailed under the MLBE. The initiative to restore the Grand River’s biophysical functioning in a way that forefronts equity and inclusion remains a work in progress. Despite the significant setback of EGLE and the EPA denying the City the permits necessary to restore a semblance of the rapids in 2023, all actors engaged in the project are optimistic that the river will be restored in some fashion. And indeed, at the time of writing Grand Rapids Whitewater, whose project manager declared, “(i)t’s not dead,” and the City government is moving forward with a new permit application [68]. Although the whitewater wave structures are no longer part of the design, the revised project entails the removal of four low head dams along the river’s downtown corridor and placing thousands of pounds of boulders and rocks to generate natural riffles and rapids, create enhanced habitat for fish and other aquatic organisms, as well as three boulder vane structures to facilitate shore access. Deputy City Manager Kate Berens states that the redesigned project has “responded to the concerns raised” by EGLE and the EPA in 2023 and has been “working very closely with” the agencies throughout the redesign process (as quoted in 61). A later phase includes removal of the larger Sixth Street Dam and an instream structure to prevent the further upstream migration of the invasive sea lamprey. Actual construction work is targeted for 2025 and the total cost of the redesigned initiative is between $15–20 million. The city submitted a permit application for the revised project in May 2024, and was recently awarded a $7 million state grant to facilitate restoration [69]. Restoring the LA River: “You cannot get to a resilient and equitable Los Angeles, without a comprehensive plan for restoring the Los Angeles River. “ [LA Waterkeeper, quoted in [70]] In the early 2000s, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was prepared to declare all but three miles of the LA River non-navigable and therefore not subject to the Clean Water Act. After kayakers surreptitiously journeyed the length of the river in 2008, the EPA ruled that the entire river was indeed navigable and subject to federal water quality standards [71]. Today, many LA residents express optimism about recent restoration plans. As UCLA environmental historian Jon Christensen notes: “[T]hey want it to be everything...it represents all sorts of goals for the city... a sign that the river is a place where dreams and hopes about the city are coming together” (cited in ([72])). The LA River Master Plan [43] lays out an ambitious vision for restoring the river and benefitting the communities through which it flows, envisioning the river as a “complex ‘system of systems’ in which people, places, and the environment are encouraged to coexist, intermingle, and thrive” [6,43]. The Plan centers equity, calling for partnerships with Indigenous communities, landbanks to protect land for affordable housing, and more parks for underserved communities, among other initiatives. Implementation of the vision remains embryonic, in part because of the scale of the endeavor (the watershed is home to roughly 9 million people), the multiple stakeholders involved, the degree to which the river has been physically altered, and competing ideas about what should be prioritized. In addition, salient critiques of the official plan have emerged from community-based organizations and environmental advocacy groups. For example, two conservation groups sued LA County in 2022 over the Master Plan, claiming that the county “failed to disclose impacts to disadvantaged communities along the river... which is a violation of the California Environmental Quality Act” (as quoted in ([73])). It is not yet clear how environmental justice goals will shape river restoration interventions, something acknowledged in the Master Plan which makes clear there is “no singular 51-mile design strategy”, and that needs and opportunities will be different at various reaches of the river ([43], 19). Nearly a million people live within a mile of the river along those reaches as it flows from Canoga Park to Long Beach, passing through 17 municipalities and scores of communities [17,43]. All but a few miles of the landscape through which the river flows are highly developed, with major impacts on the river’s ecology. The river is now mostly a concrete channel, the creation of which was a response to the river’s historically flashy and unpredictable flood regime. In the early 20thcentury, floods increasingly threatened the city’s population and infrastructure, both of which had expanded in the historical floodplain. With the completion of the Los Angeles Aqueduct in 1913--after which the city no longer needed to rely on the river for drinking water--management priorities turned to controlling the floods. In 1938, an exceptionally large flood led to widespread damage, setting in motion plans by the USACE to control the water through channelization and concretization of the river [74]. While this successfully protected the downtown area from floods, it also transformed the river into “little more than a local joke” – a trash-strewn and weed-infested channel that barely registered as a river for most residents (([75]),1). Channelization not only erased the waterway from the city’s mental map, it also amplified injustices along the river, worsening racial and income disparities in communities that had suffered historically from redlining and disinvestment [72]. Residents in these areas suffered from exposure to toxic waste left by industrial activities, while simultaneously lacking green parks, open spaces, and other environmental amenities. These disparities are most notable along the southern half of the river, where river-adjacent communities have the highest exposure to environmental and health hazards ([43], 118). LA River restoration has created opportunities for communities and advocacy organizations to become involved in urban renewal in new ways, and it has created space to express desires and needs around access to nature and recreational opportunities [76]. The Master Plan describes efforts at procedural justice, noting: “At every step of the process to update the LA River Master Plan, LA County provided opportunities to inform and engage the public. This two-way communication strategy employed a variety of media and activities across the county to ensure that resident concerns and aspirations across geographic, language, and accessibility spectra were recognized and reflected in the plan” ([43], 125). Even with a more inclusive process, there are significant disagreements about what restoration should prioritize and how to achieve EJ goals. Some groups, such as Friends of the LA River (FoLAR), focus on the ecological health of the river and how that affects vulnerable communities. FoLAR envisions “a verdant Los Angeles River that supports vulnerable communities in climate adaptation. The river will be transformed into a dynamic, functioning ecosystem that reduces flood risk, cleans the air, cools temperatures, and supports the biodiversity essential to our collective wellbeing” [77]. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) similarly supports benefitting communities by bringing “ecological processes back to the urban watershed.” The Bowtie Wetland Demonstration, which will “transform a former railyard along the LA River into an open space filled with native plants and walking paths” is an example how environmental advocates seek to integrate ecological and social concerns [78]. These organizations’ lawsuit against LA County reflects dissatisfaction with the process and projects outlined in the Master Plan, particularly with regard to ecological impacts [73]. Other organizations, such as East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice (EYCEJ), focus more centrally on justice for communities, advocating for inclusion in decision-making and equitable distribution of benefits, while raising concerns about potential displacements related to river restoration projects. For example, when the Lower LA River Master Plan was finalized in 2017, it included a “Community Stability Toolkit,” which was included because of EYCEJ’s advocacy for a Plan that would maintain the cultural cohesion of communities of color while enhancing economic opportunities [79]. A film produced by EYCEJ specifically engages recognitional justice, calling for “reclaiming the dignity and respect of the river for the South LA river communities” [79]. EYCEJ and other grassroots organizations also oppose some of the more spectacular aspects of the Master Plan, such as the series of platform parks in Southeast LA that would span the LA and Rio Hondo rivers proposed by the late architect Frank Gehry ([80]). Gehry’s project seeks to address the need for green space along a stretch of the river highly burdened by environmental and health hazards by building huge platforms (up to a mile long) that would support trees, grasses, ponds, and trails, creating recreational opportunities for communities and achieving some distributive justice ([81]). He makes the case that there is no way to rehabilitate the river at this site, because the concrete and channelized waterway protects against high flows during flood events. This is also the position of the Master Plan, which argues concrete removal would lead to increased flooding and displacement [43]. Importantly, flood-prone areas in the lower reaches of the river are disproportionately lower income, minoritized communities. A recent study showed that Black residents of LA county are 79 percent more likely than white residents to be living at risk of deep flooding of at least three feet. For Latinos, the figure was 17 percent, and for Asians, 11 percent [82]. Gehry’s vision of how to re-connect communities with the river, given the physical constraints posed by the concrete channel, captures the significant challenges and contestations associated with meeting EJ goals in LA River restoration. While it is unclear whether the platform parks will ever come to fruition, the responses to the proposed project also provide insight into contestation over EJ in river restoration. Many communities and local organizations are concerned that Gehry’s cultural center and platform parks would attract and disproportionately benefit wealthier residents, displacing the lower income residents they were intended to serve and thus undermining distributive justice goals. In LA, high rents and a limited housing stock combined with limited existing green spaces make gentrification in this area a very real concern ([43], 113). Environmental groups oppose the plan because they do not want more concrete, even if it is suspended over the channel. Instead, environmental organizations such FoLAR want to see more focus on “meaningful ecological restoration” [77], which requires channel restoration, including “strategic partial concrete removal” [72] and nature-based flood solutions for much of the river corridor. FoLAR argues that such interventions will have ecological and health benefits, making vulnerable communities more climate resilient, thereby leading to more distributive justice. A project that stands in contrast to Gehry’s platform parks from an EJ perspective is Taylor Yard, a100-acre, riverfront public access and ecological restoration project, which has an equity strategy at its core [83]. Located at the site of former rail yard (Fig 4), the project is a centerpiece of LA River restoration efforts, with estimates of final costs for transforming the yard reaching as high as $1 billion. A final design was recently selected for the first part of the project, the Paseo del Rio greenway. The 12-acre park will include nature trails, wetlands, viewpoints, and riparian habitat. While this project does not involve the river channel directly, other phases of the Taylor Yard Project, namely the G2 River Park Project, propose more engagement with the river itself. One of the conceptual plans for that project includes a new island in the stream (an opportunity for a more natural split flow, as well as riparian and upland vegetation), with another proposing some channel modification (terraces and a soft edge) [83]. Equity encompasses multiple dimensions of environmental justice in this project, since access to the riverfront addresses historical marginalization and is intended to promote more equitable distribution of the benefits of a restored river. From a procedural justice perspective, the planning process has included area residents, community and environmental groups, business owners, educators, landowners, agency and elected officials, and other local stakeholders. Note the proximity of the BIPOC community directly adjacent to the river (Base layer from Mixed Metro (mixedmetro.us), Watershed boundary from StreamStats, Project Locations from LA River Master Plan, Roads from US Census Bureau, Waterbodies from Natural Earth, County Boundaries from LA Open Data). Note the proximity of the BIPOC community directly adjacent to the river (Base layer from Mixed Metro (mixedmetro.us), Watershed boundary from StreamStats, Project Locations from LA River Master Plan, Roads from US Census Bureau, Waterbodies from Natural Earth, County Boundaries from LA Open Data). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.g004 Both Taylor Yard and Gehry’s platform parks are included in the LA Master Plan. The differing responses to these projects offer interesting insights into the complex role of EJ in urban river restoration. First, Taylor Yard’s planning process has been genuinely inclusive, responding to community-generated ideas and attentive to local needs in the design process. The 100 Acre Partnership, for example, is committed to an “ecologically focused and community driven process” to restore the 100-acre area that comprises Taylor Yard [84]. It is doing this, in part, through the creation of the Community Taylor Yard Equity Strategy, which is working to ensure that equity is “at the core of redevelopment, addressing critical issues like displacement, environmental justice, and economic security” green [85]. In contrast, Gehry’s project risks amplifying unequal power relations in the decision-making process, since the design was conceived and presented without community input. Additionally, while both projects seek to distribute river restoration benefits more equitably, Gehry’s project is also heightening fears of gentrification and displacement, reflecting a failure to acknowledge the misrecognition of historical legacies of environmental injustice in those communities. Taylor Yard does not inspire that same concern, perhaps because recognitional justice is informing what is happening on the ground. The types of green spaces and recreational opportunities are ones desired by the community and not necessarily intended to attract outsiders. But, even with projects that seem to achieve some level of procedural, distributive, or recognitional justice, it is not clear to what extent such interventions can address the structural determinants of ill health and socio-economic marginalization that characterize many of the river’s abutting neighborhoods, raising questions about the limits of river restoration projects to effect transformative change. Finally, the profound physical alteration of the LA River, and the extent to which the city has come to rely on a concrete channel to funnel water to the sea, creates significant limits to the restoration process. Attempts to achieve more robust ecological justice for the river (e.g., removing concrete, reclaiming floodplains) would likely require relocating infrastructure and neighborhoods. While this is true for most urban river restoration projects, a concretized channel amplifies the tension between ecological justice for the river and social justice for people. Reflecting on our primary research questions, ongoing efforts at urban river restoration (URR) as practiced on the Grand, Bronx, and Los Angeles Rivers have engaged questions and principles of EJ, but in ways that are highly varied and have arguably not fulfilled their potential for promoting the broad aims of distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice. Across all study sites, the discourses and aspirations of EJ have shaped URR efforts most tangibly by foregrounding concerns over equity across all aspects of restoration governance. In addition, this overt focus on EJ has gone beyond mere rhetoric and has however haltingly invited greater levels of participation from historically underrepresented communities in river restoration planning and activities. In the Bronx River case, EJ advocacy organizations and Black and Latino neighborhood groups played key roles in shaping the implementation of restoration projects. Advocates for Grand Rapids’ Black communities have forcefully inserted their perspectives and aims into forums for restoring the Grand River. And grassroots organizations in LA River have brought to light some of the problematic features of the basin’s Master Plan in terms of exacerbating environmental injustices in Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. Despite these tangible examples of EJ shaping URR, one of the central results of our research underscores the fact that integrating EJ into URR activities is highly contingent on multiple factors present to varying degrees in the three sites. These include: pre-existing community concerns over EJ that became folded into restoration planning and implementation (Bronx, LA); adequate restoration funding mechanisms at federal, state, and city levels (Bronx, Grand); participation in restoration planning and decision making that is actively sought and meaningful (Bronx, Grand); and institutional capacity and coordination between project managers, community advocacy organizations, and state/federal agencies (all sites). This last factor is particularly salient. Collaborations between state actors and non-state actors in the Bronx case have been effective, partially effective in the Grand River case, and somewhat limited in the LA case (albeit with pockets of success). These contingencies deeply shape both the opportunities for and barriers to the integration of distributive, procedural and recognitional modes of EJ into restoration initiatives. While this result may not be satisfying in terms of generalizable lessons for integrating EJ effectively within urban river restoration, it pointedly highlights that there is no “one size fits all” approach to this integration. We also set out to identify barriers to and opportunities for integrating the distributive, procedural, and recognitional dimensions of EJ into urban river restoration initiatives. The results here are a mixed bag. For example, an unresolved question relates to the question of whether, in highly urbanized environments where multiple economic and political pressures have marginalized lower income communities and communities of color, the expectation that river restoration will be a tool for achieving greater levels of recognitional, distributive and procedural justice might be unrealistic in the short term. A significant barrier across all study sites thus becomes undoing some of the structural sources of environmental injustice that have accrued over several decades. The Bronx River experience suggests, however, that opportunities exist for achieving distributive (e.g., greater access to river-oriented green spaces for historically underrepresented neighborhoods) and procedural (e.g., multiple pathways for previously marginalized groups to participate in planning and restoration activities) goals, but this achievement requires years of coalition-building, funding, and conscious efforts to build on other, non-river related EJ campaigns. And these broader-scale campaigns hinge crucially on state actors explicitly recognizing past injustices. The Bronx River case also suggests that cautiously and strategically leveraging state actors as allies in URR can enhance aims across the different dimensions of EJ. For the Grand River, the original restoration initiative, characterized as “science based” and focused on generating renewed flows for recreation and economic purposes, provided opportunities for advocacy groups emerging from, for example, Black communities in the city to forcefully demand that the River for All project become more inclusive in terms of project planning (procedural justice) and anticipated economic benefits from restoration (distributive). Yet the actual biophysical restoration of the Grand River has stalled temporarily despite strong alliances with city officials, due to barriers associated with the permitting process. In the case of the highly altered LA River, the trade-offs between the different dimensions of EJ, and between EJ goals and biophysical restoration of the river itself are likely to always be apparent. For example, restoration of the river and river-adjacent neighborhoods through additional green spaces and other environmental amenities may bring recreation and health benefits to communities (achieving distributive aims), but could also lead to negative impacts such as displacement and gentrification, a maldistribution of environmental benefits resulting from a lack of recognition of ways that environmental racism has been institutionalized over many decades within the LA region [38]. An additional barrier to bringing EJ more robustly into URR in the LA River flows out of the years of antagonism between community organizations advocating for EJ and city, state, and federal officials perceived as inattentive to their concerns. Another key finding relates to the importance of disentangling the different strands of EJ in order to identify the opportunities for more vigorously integrating EJ into URR and other types of restoration projects. Importantly, the distributive, procedural, and recognitional aspects of EJ cannot be uncritically lumped together as “social dimensions” of URR; nor can they be analyzed in isolation. Rather, they overlap and are intertwined. In the case of the Bronx River, efforts to ensure that historically marginalized communities enjoy the benefits of a restored river through access to improved riverside parks reflect both distributive justice and recognitional justice, particularly if the area is one that was previously red-lined and suffered from divestment. Additionally, many scholars see the lack of recognition of diverse cultural identities within a city or other social collective as a significant barrier to achieving distributional objectives of environmental initiatives such as river restoration, even if some level of procedural justice is present [18]. Simply having a “seat at the table” does not automatically secure meaningful participation in shaping a project’s design. These three aspects of EJ also vary depending on several factors: the historical contingencies of the projects and the cities in which they reside; the specific types of restoration activities proposed; the array of regulations, policies, and funding that guide restoration; and the power relations among the different actors engaged in restoration activities. As shown by the Grand River restoration project, there is no guarantee that proclaiming a project equitable in terms of design and implementation will necessarily resonate with urban communities long marginalized and excluded from political and economic decisions. Even in cases where URR initiatives consciously recognize historical patterns of exclusion based on race, gender, and/socio-economic status within a city, there is little likelihood that such recognition will effectively alter the institutional forces driving urban inequalities that have operated for decades. When examining our three study sites, we also see the different elements of EJ manifesting according to different timelines and different intensities in terms of their ultimate impacts. In the Bronx, where organizations committed to EJ for other purposes played key roles in the formation of the coalition that became the Bronx River Alliance, the distributive, procedural and recognitional aspects of EJ have been deeply integrated into restoration activities in ways that are transformative for many of the community’s residents. This is not to say that biophysical improvements to the river are complete. In the case of the Grand River, proponents of restoration have always considered the river’s revitalization efforts inclusive, yet it was only more recently that key officials in the city government and community organizers discerned that the project’s distributive and procedural justice aims could be enhanced by recognizing the city’s long history of politically and economically marginalizing communities of color. LA River restoration has been more top-down in its planning and design, with opposition ranging from environmentalists who want more in-channel interventions to restore ecological processes, to communities that feel excluded from decision-making. While official documents and the planning process both have an EJ focus, how this will affect individual projects is not yet clear. Our findings suggest that EJ is being incorporated into urban river restoration projects in the United States in innovative ways, most visibly through procedural and distributive justice initiatives. We also find some evidence of progress towards articulating and achieving recognitional justice, but these achievements are proving particularly challenging in cities with historical legacies of institutional racism, raising questions about the limits of environmental restoration projects to address structural inequities in the urban context. Future research should address some critical questions about the theoretical and practical interconnections between urban river restoration and the concept of environmental justice. One looming question is whether the rehabilitation of urban waterways in the ways described here accomplish biophysical aims (e.g., more natural flow and sediment regimes, upstream-downstream connectivity, enhanced aquatic biodiversity) while simultaneously enhancing EJ in cities? For example, calls for recognitional justice in some project sites—extensive parks, trails, and greenways under the rubric of URR—may actually be diluting efforts to achieve biophysical restoration and the distributive benefits this might confer. Moreover, successfully incorporating EJ into URR may require thinking at larger spatial scales and more holistically versus a singular focus on the urban corridor. Rather than simply seeing it as river restoration of a downtown urban watercourse, we should be emphasizingriverscaperestoration that includes more distal and diverse environments and neighborhoods. While our research reveals that there is no single model for incorporating the important and different elements of EJ into efforts at urban river restoration in the US or elsewhere, we argue that our cases offer important conceptual and pragmatic lessons regarding the need to identify and explain historical and local political contexts before meaningful progress can be made on socially just urban river restoration. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.s001 (DOCX) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000302.s002 (XLSX) This research was funded in part by a Seed Grant from the Dartmouth College Rockefeller Center for Public Policy. We would like to thank the numerous individuals who agreed to be interviewed for this research. Lily Pogue and Mia F. Compton-engle helped with data entry, and Aletha Spang provided crucial cartographic assistance.
→ Apri originale
Modi’s poll gains point to push on India's civil law reform, infrastructure
📰 Yahoo Entertainment 📅 2026-05-04 en
(Corrects paragraph 8 to clarify that BJP and its allies on course to control 20 states and not 22 states out of 28) By Krishna N.
Votre vie privée est importante pour nous Yahoo fait partie de laFamille de marques YahooSites et applications que nous possédons et exploitons, y compris Yahoo et Engadget, ainsi que Yahoo Advertising, notre service de publicité numérique.famille de marques Yahoo. Si vous ne souhaitez pas que nos partenaires et nous–mêmes utilisions des cookies et vos données personnelles pour ces motifs supplémentaires, cliquez surRefuser tout. Si vous souhaitez personnaliser vos choix, cliquez surGérer les paramètres de confidentialité. Vous pouvez révoquer votre consentement ou modifier vos choix à tout moment en cliquant sur les liens « Paramètres de confidentialité et des cookies » ou « Tableau de bord sur la confidentialité » présents sur nos sites et dans nos applications. Découvrez comment nous utilisons vos données personnelles dans notrePolitique de confidentialitéet notrePolitique concernant les cookies.
→ Apri originale
Barbanza concentra 14 de las 27 parroquias de la provincia priorizadas contra el fuego
📰 Lavozdegalicia.es 📅 2026-05-04 es
La delegada territorial, Belén do Campo, supervisó en Lousame trabajos de limpieza en 50 hectáreas que forman parte de una inversión millonaria para proteger los núcleos de población de los incendios forestales
La delegada territorial Belén do Campo supervisó la limpieza de 50 hectáreas en Lousame, enmarcadas en un plan de prevención de incendios forestales de la Xunta La Xunta de Galicia ha puesto en marcha un despliegue preventivo contra los incendios forestales con una ambición técnica y económica hasta ahora inédita. La delegada territorial de la Xunta en A Coruña, Belén do Campo, se desplazó este lunes hasta el municipio de Lousame para supervisar los trabajos de limpieza y acondicionamiento de montes que se ejecutan en el marco del Pladiga 2026. Esta actuación, que afecta a una extensión de 50 hectáreas situadas en el límite con Rianxo, forma parte de un plan que este año prevé intervenir en más de 33.880 hectáreas en toda la comunidad. Acompañada por el alcalde lousamiano, Esteban Ares; el concejal de Obras e Medio Ambiente de Rianxo, José Alberto Angueira; y por la directora territorial de la Consellería de Medio Rural, Nieves Mancebo, Do Campo destacó que el objetivo prioritario es anticiparse al fuego antes de que llegue la época de alto riesgo. «A anticipación e a planificación son ferramentas fundamentais na loita contra os incendios, polo que resulta imprescindible actuar durante todo o ano na conservacin e mellora destas infraestruturas forestais», subrayó la delegada. Blindaje en diez municipios El proyecto visitado hoy no es un hecho aislado, sino que se integra en una estrategia que abarca a diez ayuntamientos del área de influencia de Barbanza y el Sar: Boiro, Lousame, Dodro, Noia, Rianxo, Rois, Outes, Porto do Son, Padrón y A Pobra. En estas localidades se están creando áreas cortafuegos y mejorando pistas forestales con un presupuesto que supera los 257.000 euros y un plazo de ejecución que se extiende hasta octubre. Las tareas actuales en Lousame se centran en la mejora de las áreas de defensa para «limitar a continuidade da biomasa vexetal e reducir así o risco de propagación dos incendios forestais». Uno de los pilares de la campaña de este año es la protección de las zonas habitadas a través del convenio con la empresa pública Seaga para la limpieza de las franjas secundarias (las más cercanas a las casas). La Xunta ha duplicado la inversión para este fin, alcanzando los 25 millones de euros. En la provincia de A Coruña, la respuesta municipal ha sido masiva: 90 de los 93 ayuntamientos ya se han adherido al sistema. Do Campo definió esta hoja de ruta como «unha planificación preventiva ampla e estruturada, que ten como finalidade reducir a carga de combustible vexetal, mellorar a accesibilidade ao monte e minimizar o risco de propagación do lume nas zonas máis sensibles». Prioridad en la comarca La nueva planificación eleva de 157 a 276 el número de parroquias priorizadas en toda Galicia debido a su actividad incendiaria. La comarca de Barbanza tiene un peso específico en esta lista, sumando 14 de las 27 parroquias seleccionadas en toda la provincia. El reparto sitúa a Porto do Son a la cabeza con 5 parroquias, seguido de Boiro (3), Rianxo (2) y una en A Pobra, Carnota, Lousame y Ribeira respectivamente. En estos puntos críticos, los propietarios pueden contratar desbroces preventivos bonificados con Seaga a un precio de 420 euros por hectárea. Además, la Xunta reforzará la formación vecinal para crear aldeas preparadas. «A prevención require tamén implicación social e coñecemento, por iso é fundamental seguir achegando información útil á cidadanía para que saiba como actuar antes, durante e despois dunha situación de risco», concluyó la delegada.
→ Apri originale
Trasporto marittimo: IMO avanza su emissioni e ambiente - economiadelmare.org
📰 economiadelmare.org 📅 2026-05-04 it Aria · inquinamento Clima · decarbonizzazione Rumore · acque · biodiversità Salute · ambiente
Trasporto marittimo: IMO avanza su emissioni e ambiente economiadelmare.org
Il Comitato per la protezione dell’ambiente marino dell’Organizzazione marittima internazionale (IMO) ha concluso la sua 84a sessione impegnandosi a ricostruire il consenso sulle emissioni globali del trasporto marittimo, lanciando al contempo l’allarme sui rischi ambientali nello Stretto di Hormuz e adottando nuove misure per contrastare l’inquinamento atmosferico nell’Atlantico nord-orientale. A conclusione della riunione, svoltasi a Londra dal 27 aprile al 1° maggio 2026, il Segretario generale dell’IMO, Arsenio Dominguez, ha dichiarato: “Siamo tornati sulla strada giusta, ma dobbiamo ricostruire la fiducia. Vi incoraggio a mantenere questo slancio durante il vostro lavoro intersessionale e a preparare proposte che possano unire i membri.” Il Comitato riprenderà la sua seconda sessione straordinaria venerdì 4 dicembre 2026, previa conferma da parte dell’85ª sessione (MEPC 85) che si terrà dal 30 novembre al 3 dicembre. Quadro di riferimento IMO per le nette zero Questa settimana quasi 100 delegazioni sono intervenute per esprimere il proprio punto di vista sull’adozione di “misure a medio termine” per affrontare il problema delle emissioni di gas serra (GHG) provenienti dalle navi, note come Quadro Net-Zero dell’IMO , presentando diverse proposte su come portare avanti i negoziati. Il Comitato ha convenuto di istituire un gruppo di lavoro intersessionale per risolvere diverse problematiche e promuovere una maggiore convergenza su una misura globale in vista dell’85ª sessione del MEPC, che si terrà tra sei mesi. Gli Stati membri potranno presentare nuovi emendamenti e modifiche al progetto di emendamento precedentemente approvato. Prima della MEPC 85 (dal 30 novembre al 3 dicembre) saranno programmate due riunioni intersessionali (dall’1 al 4 settembre e dal 23 al 27 novembre), nonché un seminario di un giorno per esperti sui modelli di “catena di custodia”, che tracciano l’origine e il movimento dei combustibili lungo la catena di approvvigionamento, garantendo che le emissioni siano correttamente tracciate e verificate. La seconda sessione straordinaria del MEPC ( aggiornata lo scorso ottobre) dovrebbe riprendere il 4 dicembre, previa discussione in occasione dell’85ª sessione del MEPC. Stretto di Hormuz e ambiente marino Il Comitato ha adottato una risoluzione che condanna gli attacchi contro le navi mercantili nella regione dello Stretto di Hormuz e i relativi rischi di inquinamento marino. Il Comitato ha riconosciuto la vulnerabilità del Golfo Persico e delle acque adiacenti, avvertendo che tali attacchi potrebbero causare un inquinamento marino su vasta scala, come petrolio, sostanze pericolose e nocive e residui pericolosi derivanti da missili, droni, incendi ed esplosioni. Il Comitato ha chiesto al Segretario generale di monitorare gli impatti ambientali e di riferire in merito alla prossima sessione del Consiglio dell’IMO. Nuova area di controllo delle emissioni per l’Atlantico nord-orientale Il Comitato ha adottato una nuova Area di controllo delle emissioni (ECA) nell’Atlantico nord-orientale, introducendo limiti di emissione più severi per gli ossidi di azoto (NOx), gli ossidi di zolfo (SOx) e il particolato (PM). La data di entrata in vigore è fissata al 1° settembre 2027, mentre l’ECA diventerà effettiva 12 mesi dopo, nel 2028. La Zona Economica Esclusiva (CEA) comprende le zone economiche esclusive e le acque territoriali, estendendosi fino a 200 miglia nautiche dalle linee di base di Groenlandia, Islanda, Isole Faroe, Irlanda, Regno Unito continentale, Francia, Spagna e Portogallo. All’interno delle ECA , le navi devono utilizzare carburante con un contenuto di zolfo non superiore allo 0,10%. La riduzione delle emissioni di SOx e NOx diminuisce il rischio di cancro ai polmoni, malattie cardiovascolari, ictus e asma infantile. Migliora inoltre la visibilità in mare e riduce l’acidificazione, contribuendo a proteggere le colture e le foreste. Strategia e piano d’azione 2026 sui rifiuti di plastica in mare Il Comitato ha adottato la Strategia 2026 e il Piano d’azione per affrontare il problema dei rifiuti di plastica in mare provenienti dalle navi, riaffermando l’obiettivo dell’IMO di azzerare gli scarichi di rifiuti di plastica in mare dalle navi entro il 2030. La strategia e il piano d’azione mirano a migliorare le strutture di accoglienza portuale e il trattamento dei rifiuti, rafforzando la conformità normativa ed espandendo la sensibilizzazione del pubblico e la formazione dei marittimi, nonché la cooperazione internazionale, compresa l’assistenza tecnica mirata e lo sviluppo delle capacità. Aggiornano e sostituiscono la strategia del 2021 e il piano d’azione del 2025 per affrontare il problema dei rifiuti marini . Sviluppo di un codice per il trasporto di granuli di plastica Il Comitato ha convenuto di elaborare un codice obbligatorio che disciplini il trasporto marittimo di granuli di plastica in container, ai sensi dell’Allegato III della Convenzione MARPOL e/o della Convenzione SOLAS. Il Sottocomitato per la prevenzione e la risposta all’inquinamento (PPR 14) è stato incaricato di redigere il codice e di riferire al MEPC. Interventi sulla marcatura degli attrezzi da pesca Il Comitato ha approvato una circolare che promuove l’attuazione di sistemi di marcatura degli attrezzi da pesca, in linea con le Linee guida volontarie della FAO sulla marcatura degli attrezzi da pesca (VGMFG). Lotta contro gli organismi acquatici nocivi nelle acque di zavorra Il Comitato ha approvato un pacchetto di emendamenti alla Convenzione sulla gestione delle acque di zavorra ( BWM ), a seguito di una revisione del trattato e dei relativi strumenti nell’ambito di una fase di acquisizione di esperienza (EBP). La revisione è stata condotta per perfezionare l’attuazione, colmare le lacune normative e garantire che la Convenzione rimanga uno strumento efficace e pratico per la protezione degli ecosistemi marini. Gli emendamenti riguardano diverse disposizioni obbligatorie della Convenzione (regolamenti e appendici contenuti nell’Allegato alla Convenzione). Il Comitato ha adottato le Linee guida riviste per la gestione delle acque di zavorra e lo sviluppo dei piani di gestione delle acque di zavorra (G4). Riduzione del rumore irradiato sott’acqua dalle navi Il Comitato ha fatto progressi nei suoi lavori sul rumore irradiato sottomarino ( URN ), concordando in linea di principio di estendere la fase di acquisizione di esperienza (EBP) di due anni, fino alla fine del 2028. L’obiettivo dell’EBP è quello di affrontare gli ostacoli che gli Stati membri incontrano nell’applicazione delle Linee guida URN dell’IMO (Linee guida rivedute per la riduzione del rumore irradiato sottomarino dalle navi al fine di affrontare gli impatti negativi sulla vita marina – MEPC.1/Circ.906/Rev.1 ). Il Comitato ha concordato in linea di principio di commissionare all’IMO uno studio sulle emissioni di URN, come base di dati per possibili misure future. Gli Stati membri sono stati inoltre invitati a presentare proposte per una tabella di marcia politica sulle emissioni di URN alla MEPC 85. Nuove uscite Il Comitato ha concordato tre nuovi risultati su cui lavorare nei prossimi due anni: Modifiche al regolamento 12 dell’allegato VI della MARPOL per vietare la reintroduzione di sostanze che riducono lo strato di ozono sulle navi; e per vietare la reintroduzione di sostanze che riducono lo strato di ozono sulle navi; e Misure per affrontare la questione delle navi di superficie autonome marittime ( MASS ) negli strumenti di competenza del Comitato per la protezione dell’ambiente marino. È stato approvato in linea di principio un nuovo documento sul tema “Sostenere l’attuazione dell’accordo BBNJ nell’ambito del quadro normativo dell’IMO per la protezione dei mari, degli oceani e della biodiversità marina”, che sarà sottoposto a ulteriore esame da parte del MEPC 85. Altre decisioni chiave Il Comitato ha inoltre adottato provvedimenti in merito ai seguenti punti: Ha approvato i termini di riferimento per il quinto studio IMO sui gas serra e ha richiesto al Segretariato dell’IMO di avviare la procedura di appalto per lo studio; e ha richiesto al di avviare la procedura di appalto per lo studio; Sono state adottate le Linee guida del 2026 per le misurazioni al banco prova e a bordo delle emissioni di CH4 e/o N2O provenienti dai motori diesel marini; per le misurazioni al banco prova e a bordo delle emissioni di provenienti dai motori diesel marini; Approvate le bozze di emendamento al Codice Tecnico NOx del 2008 relative ai combustibili non contenenti carbonio, in vista di una successiva adozione. È stato concordato che si dovrebbe sviluppare uno strumento giuridico vincolante e autonomo per il controllo e la gestione del biofouling delle navi, al fine di minimizzare il trasferimento di specie acquatiche invasive. Un resoconto completo della riunione sarà disponibile a tempo debito.
→ Apri originale
80 Summer Quotes for Kids to Make It a Fun and Happy Season
📰 Positivityblog.com 📅 2026-05-04 en
Summer is a magical time. Especially if you’re a kid. No school and endless warm days for adventures that make fond memories. And in today’s post I’d like to help the children in your life – or you yourself, if you’re a child or teenager – to have the best su…
→ Apri originale
Varata in Cina la Lucia Cosulich, seconda nave methanol-ready del gruppo
📰 SHIP MAG Media 📅 2026-05-04 it Clima · decarbonizzazione
La nuova unità della serie Imo II rafforza la strategia della Fratelli Cosulich nella transizione verso combustibili alternativi L'articolo Varata in Cina la Lucia Cosulich, seconda nave methanol-ready del gruppo proviene da Shipmag .
La nuova unità della serie Imo II rafforza la strategia della Fratelli Cosulich nella transizione verso combustibili alternativi Pechino – A due mesi dal varo della prima unità della serie, una nuova nave del gruppo Fratelli Cosulich ha toccato l’acqua. Infatti è stata varata la Lucia Cosulich, segnando un ulteriore passo concreto nel percorso della Marine Energy unit verso l’adozione di combustibili marini alternativi e lo sviluppo di soluzioni di bunkering sempre più sostenibili. La cerimonia si è svolta presso il cantiere Taizhou Maple Leaf Shipyard, in Cina, riunendo il team di progetto, partner e stakeholder per celebrare il passaggio della nave dal cantiere al mare. A rendere l’occasione ancora più significativa è stata la presenza di Lucia Cosulich, madrina della nave. Nel suo intervento ha espresso gratitudine verso tutte le persone coinvolte, sottolineando il valore della collaborazione che ha reso possibile il progetto e il suo contributo al percorso dell’industria marittima verso il net zero. Con il tradizionale taglio del nastro, la Lucia Cosulich è stata ufficialmente varata, entrando così nelle fasi finali che precedono il completamento e la consegna. Seconda di quattro unità gemelle methanol-ready Imo II, la nave si inserisce in una strategia più ampia. Progettata fin dall’origine con predisposizione all’utilizzo del metanolo, punta alla transizione energetica: integrare l’impiego di carburanti alternativi con la flessibilità necessaria per operare in modo efficiente nel mercato contemporaneo. Tra le principali caratteristiche progettuali figurano il rivestimento delle cisterne cargo in epossifenolico e sistemi predisposti per la futura integrazione di nuovi combustibili. Soluzioni che permettono alla nave di adattarsi all’evoluzione delle normative e delle esigenze operative, mantenendo al contempo elevati standard di sicurezza e prestazioni. Ogni unità di questa serie contribuisce a rafforzare la capacità del gruppo di offrire soluzioni di bunkering affidabili e innovative. Con il varo della Lucia Cosulich, questa visione continua a prendere forma, consolidando il ruolo di Fratelli Cosulich nella transizione energetica del settore marittimo.
→ Apri originale
🏠