Aria, clima, elettrificazione, acque e biodiversità. 6015 articoli raccolti da fonti istituzionali e specializzate, classificati per area ambientale e linkati al porto di riferimento.
Secondo l’associazione il settore manifatturiero è vicino al collasso. Le indicazioni per fronteggiare la crisi L'articolo Allarme Face per l’industria europea dell’alluminio alla prese con dazi e prezzi di mercato altissimi proviene da Shipping Italy .
La Face, Federation of Aluminium Consumers in Europe, attraverso il segretario generale Mario Conserva, avverte che l’industria europea dell’alluminio rischia di esplodere; il prezzo del metallo al London Metal Exchange è schizzato a 3.600 euro per tonnellata e potrebbe arrivare a 4.000, e, secondo un’analisi condotta da Face insieme all’università Luiss, con questo aumento, sommato ai costi fissi, il sovrapprezzo complessivo per le aziende europee raggiunge gli 1,8 miliardi di euro all’anno: una cifra enorme, quasi il doppio rispetto al miliardo stimato in passato quando il mercato era più stabile (con prezzi Lme compresi tra i 2.300 e i 2.500 euro per tonnellata).
Secondo Mario Conserva il vero problema non è rappresentato solo dal mercato globale, ma dalla scelta politica europea riguardante i dazi doganali sull’alluminio grezzo, che aggiungono circa 80-100 euro a tonnellata e che ‘negli ultimi 20 anni ha reso l’industria europea strutturalmente più vulnerabile ed ha amplificato l’impatto di shock globali, dalla crisi Covid alla guerra in Ucraina fino alle più recenti tensioni geopolitiche’.
I dazi vengono definiti un ‘sussidio occulto’ dall’associazione in quanto chi trasforma l’alluminio (le industrie a valle) paga di più per proteggere pochi produttori di materia prima. Inoltre emerge una situazione contraddittoria: L’Europa deve importare oltre l’85% dell’alluminio primario che usa e, mentre importiamo metallo nuovo a prezzi molto alti, i rottami di alluminio – fondamentali per il riciclo – lasciano il continente per essere venduti altrove. Una situazione questa, che rende le nostre imprese molto più fragili di fronte ai suddetti shock esterni.
La conclusione di Face è che ‘l’industria manifatturiera europea – utilizzatrice dell’alluminio in ogni comparto, dalle auto agli imballaggi, dall’edilizia all’elettronica – non può più reggere questo peso’ e la proposta che ne consegue è l’eliminazione immediata dei dazi sull’alluminio grezzo per ridare competitività alle imprese e salvarle dal ‘punto di rottura’.
ISCRIVITI ALLA NEWSLETTER QUOTIDIANA GRATUITA DI SHIPPING ITALY
SHIPPING ITALY E’ ANCHE SU WHATSAPP: BASTA CLICCARE QUI PER ISCRIVERSI AL CANALE ED ESSERE SEMPRE AGGIORNATI
The dust has settled on the transfer portal for women's basketball. Oklahoma State, UCLA, Ole Miss and Arizona State brought in impressive classes.
It’s been more than a month since the transfer portal opened for women’s college basketball. The dust has largely settled on a busy portal season and most of the top 100 or so players in the nation have picked new destinations. We don’t know how the players will fit in with new teammates, if they can thrive in different conferences, or how they’ll adjust to different coaching style. But we know what the rosters look like, how good all these players have been in previous seasons and — judging from social media posts — we know which coaches are excited about their teams for next season. “Grateful for players that believed in a vision and that had the courage to blaze their own path,” Oklahoma State coach Jacie Hoyt wrote on X. “Grateful for a staff that worked tirelessly to make it happen.” “When the staff gets it right in the portal and in the freshman class… Proud of our program,”Arizona Statecoach Molly Miller wrote on X. “The work is the reward.” Here are USA TODAY Sports’ top 15 portal class rankings for women’s college basketball: Key additions:Audi Crooks (Iowa State), Liv McGill (Florida), Ellie Brueggemann (Lindenwood), Nènè Ndiaye (Rutgers) It’s difficult to argue any other team had a better portal haul than Jacie Hoyt’s Cowgirls, who landed the nation’s second-leading scorer in Crooks, a dynamic guard in McGill, a sharpshooting deep threat in Brueggemann and a versatile forward in Ndiaye. Oklahoma State also picked up former Baylor guard Yuting Deng, Utah guard LA Sneed and Missouri State guard Zoe Canfield to shore up the Cowgirls’ depth in the backcourt. Pairing all those pieces with returner All-Big 12 selection Stailee Heard makes Oklahoma State a team capable of a deep run in March. Key additions:Addy Brown (Iowa State), Elina Aarnisalo (North Carolina), Donovyn Hunter (TCU), Bonnie Deas (Arkansas) After winning the national championship, UCLA sent their top six players off to the WNBA. Aside from Sienna Betts, the roster seemed thin. But then coach Cori Close and her staff brought in an impressive collection of talent, headlined by the do-it-all Iowa State forward Brown. After a season at UNC, where she helped the Tar Heels advance to the Sweet 16, Aarnisalo returned to UCLA. The Bruins rounded out their portal class with a top SEC rookie in Deas, one of TCU’s top players in Hunter, and Notre Dame’s KK Bransford. Count on the Bruins being competitive in March again. Key additions:Talaysia Cooper (Tennessee), Jada Richard (LSU), Jaida Civil (Tennessee), Doneelah Washington (Illinois State) Rebels head coach Yolett McPhee-McCuin doing damage in the portal is nothing new. Once again, she and her staff have assembled a roster that resembles a team capable of making noise in March again. The class is headlined by two of the top guards in the SEC — Cooper and Richard — joining Ole Miss. Coach Yo also brought in All-America East selection Jade Tillman, San Jose State forward Maya Anderson, Tennessee guard Jaida Civil and a handful of other key contributors to boost their depth. Key additions:Ruby Whitehorn (Tennessee), Rashunda Jones (Michigan State), Ayanna-Sarai Darrington (Central Michigan), Madi Morson (Central Michigan) Coach Molly Miller built on an impressive debut season with the Sun Devils by bringing a collection of talented players from the portal. Whitehorn was a top player for Tennessee in the 2024-25 season, Jones has been an All-Big Ten defender, Darrington led the MAC in field goal percentage, Morson was the MAC Player of the Year and Quinnipiac's Ella Ryan shot 41.1% from behind the arc this past season. It’s a roster that should be near the top of the Big 12. Key additions:Achol Akot (Oklahoma State), Sophie Burrows (Syracuse), Chloe Clardy (Stanford), Gabby White (Virginia) Coach Courtney Banghart went into the portal with a list of needs and checked all the boxes. The Tar Heels landed a tough forward in Akot, a knockdown shooter in Burrows and a pair of combo guards in Clardy and White. Akot fits the mold of Nyla Harris and Alyssa Ustby, previous players who have played power forward for Banghart. Burrows should slot into Indya Nivar's position after she was drafted by the Atlanta Dream. Clardy and White will be part of a backcourt rotation that also features Kate Harpring, the Naismith High School Player of the Year. Key additions:Zamareya Jones (NC State), Carys Baker (Virginia Tech), Deniya Prawl (Tennessee) Coach Jeff Walz was already returning a talented core of players that competed for the ACC Championship and advanced to the Sweet 16 and boosted that group with an impressive trio of players from the portal. Jones is a guard that can quickly fill up the scoreboard, Baker is a versatile forward and All-ACC selection, and Prawl showed promise as a rookie at Tennessee. Count on the Cardinals contending in the ACC again. Key additions:Lanie Grant (North Carolina), Lara Somfai (Stanford), Jadyn Wooten (Oklahoma State), Bella Hines (LSU) After a second consecutive trip to the Elite Eight, coach Mark Campbell reloaded his roster. The Horned Frogs return center Clara Silva, and TCU’s staff added players that should fit in nicely around her. Grant has flashed big-time potential as a playmaking guard at North Carolina, Somfai was one of the ACC’s best rookies at Stanford, Wooten was an All-Big 12 selection, and Hines showed promise in an off-the-bench role at LSU — shooting 45% from the floor and 37% from 3-point land. If Campbell can make all the pieces fit, TCU could be a contender again. Key additions:Zahirah Walton (George Mason), Skylar Forbes (Marquette), Alexis Bordas (Duquesne), Kennedy Harris (George Mason) The Mountaineers won the Big 12 and earned a top 16 seed in the NCAA Tournament last season in Mark Kellogg’s third year as coach. In the offseason, he’s assembled a collection of players that seem capable of putting WVU in a position to do that again. Walton and Harris powered George Mason to program heights by winning the A-10 Tournament and regular season titles, Forbes is a top-notch defender and sharp free throw shooter, and Bordas has high potential after a strong rookie season. Kellogg added a handful of other players — like BYU’s Marya Hudgins and UCF’s Khyala Ngodu — that should help as well. Key additions:Kaylene Smikle (Maryland), Naomi White (Northern Arizona), Fatmata Janneh (Texas A&M), Kennedy Fauntleroy (East Carolina) Coach Kim Caldwell completely flipped the Lady Vols’ roster after last season’s team either exhausted their eligibility or transferred out. Tennessee didn’t bring in any flashy, All-American type names, but — Lady Vols’ fans hope — ones that fit Caldwell’s style of play. Smikle averages 17.1 points per game across her career in the Big Ten, White was 15th nationally in scoring this past season as a rookie at Northern Arizona, Janneh proved she could play in the paint in the SEC at Texas A&M, and Fauntleroy is a well-traveled veteran guard who has won conference awards in the Big East and American. Caldwell brought in several other transfers too, including Avery Mills from Liberty, Rylie Theuerkauf of Georgia, Aaliyah Moore from Texas and Seton Hall’s Jada Eads. Key additions:Dani Carnegie (Georgia), Amari Whiting (Oklahoma State), Jocelyn Faison (Georgia) Coach Jan Jensen didn’t need to add many players in the portal, but got one of the most talented players available in Carnegie — an All-SEC guard this past season who has experience playing alongside Chit-Chat Wright. The duo starred together at Georgia Tech as freshmen. Whiting — who averaged 9.6 points, 5.9 rebounds and 2.6 assists per game for Oklahoma State this past season — should be a strong contributor as well. Key additions:Aryss Macktoon (La Salle), Arianny Francisco de Oliveira (Gulf Coast State), Cali Smallwood (UAB), Reese Beaty (Iowa State) After missing the NCAA Tournament, coach Sam Purcell landed players to boost their chances of dancing next season. Macktoon is the headliner of the class after being named Defensive Player of the Year in the Atlantic 10, while Francisco de Oliveira was ranked as the top junior college transfer in the country. Smallwood ranked fourth nationally in 3-pointers made per game this past season, and Beaty was fourth among freshmen nationally in assist-turnover ratio. All-CUSA freshmen team selection Macie Phifer and junior college standout Tootie Lockett round out an impressive haul for the Bulldogs. Key additions:Jada Williams (Iowa State), Laila Reynolds (Florida), Chloe Larry (Tennessee Tech) Coach Kim Mulkey had big shoes to fill in the backcourt following the graduation of Flau’Jae Johnson. Filling that vacancy became even more important when Jada Richard opted to transfer to Ole Miss. So, the Tigers went out and got Williams, who ranked third nationally in assists per game with 7.7 and also posted 15.3 points per game last season at Iowa State. Reynolds and Larry should boost LSU’s depth as well. Key additions:Gracie Merkle (Penn State), Leah Harmon (UCF), Tayla Thomas (Northwestern) The Gophers made the Sweet 16 for the first time since 2005 this past season under third-year coach Dawn Plitzuweit and returned their top three starters from that core. Minnesota landed Merkle to fill in the gaps, who has ranked in the top three nationally in field goal percentage in each of her past three seasons. Last season for Penn State, she averaged 19.2 points and 8.2 rebounds per game. Harmon brings offensive firepower and Thomas averaged 9.7 points and 7.2 rebounds per game last season. Key additions:Mackenzie Nelson (Virginia Tech), Edie Clarke (Saint Mary’s), Jenna Lawrence (Arkansas) Coach Shawn Poppie guided the Tigers to the NCAA Tournament in his second season, the second time Clemson has gone dancing since 2002. To increase the Tigers chances of getting back there, Poppie added size, potential and a veteran guard in Nelson who ranked second nationally in assist-turnover ratio last season. Clarke is versatile 6-foot-4 forward who can block shots and hit 3-pointers, Lawrence is 6-foot-3 and proved to be a capable player in the SEC, and players like Taliyah Henderson and Yakiya Milton have high upside. Key additions:Kiyomi McMiller (Penn State), Vanessa Harris (Rhode Island), Jordan Jones (Arizona State), Mallory Miller (Butler) Coach Tammi Reiss got to work right away on rebuilding Florida and has brought in a total of nine transfers ahead of her first season. The headliner is McMiller, who ranked 12th nationally in scoring with 21.6 points per game this past season. Harris was the Atlantic 10 Sixth Player of the Year last season while playing for Reiss at Rhode Island, Jones didn’t play this past season but averaged 19.8 points per game at Denver two years ago and the 6-foot-4 Miller proved to be a capable rim-protector in the Big East last season. Also considered: Kentucky, Washington, UCF, Georgia, Rutgers
Fugro has started geotechnical survey work for the Berwick Bank offshore wind project under […] The post Fugro starts geotechnical survey work for 1.4 GW Berwick Bank B offshore wind farm appeared first on Offshore Energy .
Fugro has started geotechnical survey work for the Berwick Bank offshore wind project under a contract the company was awarded by SSE Renewables. The contract covers geotechnical investigations for Berwick Bank B, the second phase ofthe wider 4.1 GW offshore wind development in Scotland, planned to be built in the outer Firth of Forth off the East Lothian coast. According to the developer, the full Berwick Bank project is being developed across three phases and, if fully built out, could become the world’s largest offshore wind farm, capable of generating enough electricity to power more than six million homes annually. SSE secured a Contract for Difference (CfD) for the 1.4 GW Berwick Bank Bin the UK’s Allocation Round 7 (AR7) at the beginning of this year. Under the contract with SSE, Fugro will carry out a full geotechnical investigation campaign to support the design of fixed-bottom turbine foundations at Berwick Bank B. The company said boreholes will be drilled up to 50 meters below the seabed to collect soil and rock samples for foundation engineering studies. The work is being performed by the vessels Fugro Quest and Fugro Zenith using specialist coring and conventional sampling techniques suited to the site’s seabed conditions. Fugro said the new award builds on its ongoing involvement in the project, where it has been carrying out surveys since 2019. “The commencement of a geotechnical investigation campaign to inform the final design of Berwick Bank B’s turbine foundations is an important milestone and demonstrates our commitment at SSE to disciplined and derisked project delivery”,saidGordon Rae, Geotechnical Package Manager for Berwick Bank at SSE Renewables. “As we progress the project towards the final investment decision (FID), we are pleased to continue our longstanding relationship with Fugro and look forward to delivering a safe and successful geotechnical investigation programme at Berwick Bank B.” In January, SSE said that itexpects to reach the final investment decision for Berwick Bank B in 2027, and that the remaining two phases of Berwick Bank were available for entry into upcoming auction rounds. Take the spotlight and anchor your brand in the heart of the offshore world! Join us for a bigger impact and amplify your presence at the core hub of the offshore energy community!
Australian energy giant Woodside has highlighted the findings of a new report, which indicates that the development of what is said to be Australia’s largest untapped conventional gas resource could bring a multibillion-dollar boost to the country’s economy, while fortifying its energy security. The post $30 billion mega gas project set to enrich Australia’s countrywide GDP by $98.7 billion appeared first on Offshore Energy .
Australian energy giant Woodside has highlighted the findings of a new report, which indicates that the development of what is said to be Australia’s largest untapped conventional gas resource could bring a multibillion-dollar boost to the country’s economy, while fortifying its energy security. After Woodsideobtained environmental approvalfor theNorth West Shelf (NWS)project extension from the Western Australian government, restarting the federal environmental approvals process, the green light was perceived to be the key to advancing the firm’sBrowse gas projectand extending theKarratha gas plant’s life to 2070. This project is currently in the concept definition phase, and key activities continue in support of progress towards front-end engineering and design (FEED) entry. The Australian operator has nowreleased an economic impact assessmentby Deloitte Access Economics, which estimates theBrowse to NWS projectcould contribute a long-term uplift of aroundA$147 billion ($102.9 billion)in gross state product for Western Australia, more thanA$141 billion ($98.7 billion)in gross domestic product (GDP) nationally, and overA$56 billion ($39.2 billion)in taxes, includingA$19.8 billion ($13.9 billion)in petroleum resource rent tax (PRRT). The Browse gas project, which is located almost 300 kilometers offshore in deep waters, is intended to backfill the NWS as supply from existing fields declines. The capital expenditure for the Australian mega offshore energy development is estimated to require $25 –$30 billionbetween 2019 and 2063, according to analysts. This content is available after accepting the cookies. Woodside’s Australian gas project gets green light for 40 more years of operation The independent modelling shows the proposed Browse to North West Shelf project represents a significant opportunity to strengthen Australia’s energy security, support the energy transition, and deliver long-term economic benefits for Western Australia and the nation. The report also points to substantial employment and economy-wide benefits if the multibillion-dollar project proceeds to development. Liz Westcott, Woodside’s Chief Executive Officer, emphasized:“Browse is Australia’s biggest undeveloped offshore gas resource and represents a major opportunity for the nation at a time when energy security matters more than ever. “Independent modelling shows Browse has the potential to power homes and businesses, support thousands of Australian jobs and generate significant revenue for governments while also helping to manage the risks and costs of the energy transition.” Woodside underlines that the Deloitte assessment finds Browse is not just an energy project, but a whole-of-economy investment, delivering benefits well beyond the oil and gas sector. The modelling estimates the project could deliver up to 4,760 direct and indirect full-time equivalent jobs across Australia at peak operations. Given that around 80% of economic impacts are expected to flow to industries outside oil and gas, including construction, services, and public services, the findings indicate Australian communities, businesses, and public services are expected to benefit if the Browse to NWS project is developed. Additionally, Deloitte Access Economics’ independent modelling points out that the project could ease pressure on Western Australia’s energy system as the state implements its energy transition plans, estimating that additional domestic gas from Browse could support a more stable and reliable energy system. This is expected to be accomplished by generating electricity to keep the lights on in homes and businesses, backing up renewables, enabling a more orderly and lower-cost scale-up of renewable energy, supporting critical minerals processing and other energy-intensive industries needed for electrification. Woodside underscores that Browse gas could also play a role in helping Australia’s trading partners in the Asia Pacific reduce their reliance on coal-fired power while also supporting energy security in the region. The project has a forecast production capacity of 11.4 million tonnes per annum of LNG, LPG, and domestic gas, and a peak condensate production rate of 50,000 barrels per day. The proposed Browse to NWS project would deliver natural gas from theCalliance,Torosa, andBrecknockfields to the existing Karratha gas plant via an approximately 900-kilometer pipeline, connected to two floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) units. As elaborated by Woodside, a carbon capture and storage (CCS) solution has been incorporated into the project design and is expected to enable a reduction of 53 million tonnes (mt) CO2e of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as compared to the project’s 2019 Scope 1 emissions estimate. Take the spotlight and anchor your brand in the heart of the offshore world! Join us for a bigger impact and amplify your presence at the core hub of the offshore energy community!
Transizione energetica in ambito portuale: governance, tecnologia e modelli di autoconsumo energetico Canale Energia
I porti stanno diventando protagonisti della transizione energetica.Innovazione, sostenibilità ed efficienza energetica sono oggi elementi centrali per costruire infrastrutture portuali più moderne e competitive. Il 22 maggio alle ore 15.00, a hashtag#Ravenna, ASSOCOSTIERI promuove il convegno “Transizione energetica in ambito portuale: governance, tecnologia e modelli di autoconsumo energetico”, in collaborazione con DEPORTIBUS. Al centro dell’incontro ci saranno temi sempre più strategici per il futuro dei porti: cold ironing, comunità energetiche rinnovabili (CER) e modelli di autoconsumo energetico.Soluzioni concrete che possono contribuire a ridurre le emissioni, migliorare l’efficienza delle infrastrutture e favorire una gestione dell’energia più integrata e sostenibile. A moderare il confronto sarà Dario Soria, Direttore Generale di Assocostieri. Aprirà i lavori Francesco Benevolo, Presidente dell’Autorità di Sistema Portuale del Mare Adriatico centro settentrionale. Previsti i saluti istituzionali di Donato Liguori, Direttore generale per i porti, la logistica e l’intermodalità del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti e di Fabrizio Giovannone, Capo del 2° Reparto (Affari giuridici e servizi d’istituto) del Comando Generale del Corpo delle Capitanerie di porto – Guardia Costiera Interverranno:– Emanuele Corradini, Neta, Engineering Group– Michele Francioni, MSC Cruises– Ivo Gattulli, Koinè ETS– Vincenzo Naciti, Datanetwork– Federico Rossi e Sabrina Sacchetti EY– Carmine Suanno e Carlo Fusero, Eng.Co Group– Carlo Troccoli, ASSOCOSTIERI SERVIZI S.R.L. Un’occasione di confronto tra istituzioni, imprese e operatori del settore per approfondire tecnologie, modelli energetici innovativi e nuove sinergie a supporto della transizione energetica in ambito portuale. REGISTRAZIONE Per ricevere quotidianamente i nostri aggiornamenti su energia e transizione ecologica, basta iscriversi alla nostra newsletter gratuita
Islands emerge in novels and poems as mythical, seductive places; they are separate from the mainland in a way that could be a punishment or an escape, or sometimes both. They are places of nostalgia and longing, where we may
Rifiuti trasportati senza autorizzazione al porto di Trapani TP24.it
11/05/2026 10:40:00
Trasportava rifiuti speciali non pericolosi senza le autorizzazioni previste. Per questo un uomo di Marsala è stato sanzionato dalla Capitaneria di porto di Trapani con una multa da 3.200 euro.
Il controllo è scattato al porto di Trapani, dopo lo sbarco dell’autocarro da una nave in servizio sulla tratta tra Trapani e le Isole Egadi. I militari della Guardia Costiera, impegnati in attività mirate contro il trasporto illecito di rifiuti anche via mare, hanno ispezionato il mezzo e verificato il carico.
A bordo sono stati trovati nove sacchi di plastica contenenti rifiuti speciali non pericolosi, tra cui carta, plastica e scarti di cantiere, per un volume complessivo di circa 1,5 metri cubi. Il trasporto avveniva senza il formulario di identificazione dei rifiuti, documento obbligatorio per legge.
Oltre alla sanzione amministrativa, all’uomo è stato intimato di conferire i rifiuti presso un centro autorizzato e di presentare alla Capitaneria la documentazione che attesti il corretto smaltimento.
L’attività rientra nei controlli ambientali coordinati dalla Direzione Marittima di Palermo. La Guardia Costiera annuncia che le verifiche saranno intensificate con l’avvio della stagione estiva.
Seadrill, an offshore drilling contractor, has secured a batch of rig assignments and extensions across the U.S. Gulf, Brazil, and Angola, with LLOG, a subsidiary of Harbour Energy, Brazil’s state-owned oil and gas giant Petrobras, and France’s energy giant TotalEnergies.. The post Seadrill’s new rig deals of over $860 million lift total backlog to $3.1 billion appeared first on Offshore Energy .
Seadrill, an offshore drilling contractor, has secured a batch of rig assignments and extensions across the U.S. Gulf, Brazil, and Angola, with LLOG, a subsidiary of Harbour Energy, Brazil’s state-owned oil and gas giant Petrobras, and France’s energy giant TotalEnergies. Seadrill’s latest fleet status report shows the rig owner obtained multiple contract awards across the Americas and Africa, adding over $860 million to contract backlog since the previous report. As a result, the company’s total contract backlog now stands at $3.1 billion. The 2008-builtWest Polarisdrillship was awarded a three-year contract extension withPetrobrasin Brazil. The deal is due to begin in January 2028, bringing approximately $480 million to the firm’s contract backlog. The 2014-builtWest Neptuneand the 2013-builtWest Veladrillshipsgot workin the Gulf of America (U.S. Gulf of Mexico) with Harbour Energy’sLLOG,adding $260 million to the offshore drilling player’s contract backlog. While the first drillship was given a 365-day contract extension, with operations scheduled to start in October 2026, the second rig was hired on a program with a duration of 270 days and an expected commencement in September 2026. The 2015-builtSonangol Quengueladrillship landed a contract extension withTotalEnergiesin Angola for an estimated 480 days, committing the rig through July 2028. In addition, the 2015-builtWest Carinadrillship extended its current contract with Petrobras in Brazil into June 2026. Seadrill reported a net loss of $7 million and adjusted EBITDA of $97 million for the first quarter of 2026. At quarter-end, the company had gross principal debt of $625 million and $329 million in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, for a net debt position of $296 million. The use of cash during the first quarter of 2026 included $51 million for capital additions and long-term maintenance, which was impacted by payments for contract preparation activities forWest JupiterandWest Capella, as well as the timing of working capital. Both rigs began operations late in the first quarter of 2026, with mobilization revenue due to be collected in the second quarter of 2026. This content is available after accepting the cookies. Seadrill’s rig trio scoops up drilling jobs in US and Angola While Seadrill’s total operating revenues range increased to $1.43 – $1.48 billion from the previous $1.40 – $1.45 billion, excluding $50 million of reimbursable revenues, the adjusted EBITDA range rose to $370 – $420 million from $350 – $400 million. The firm maintained capital expenditure and long-term maintenance range at $200 – $240 million. Samir Ali, Seadrill’s President and CEO, commented:“Seadrill delivered a solid quarter financially and operationally, including the completion of two major projects ahead of schedule and on budget. These achievements, together with recent commercial success, enhance visibility toward higher earnings and free cash flow in the second half of 2026 and into 2027. “Increasing demand for deepwater rigs is supported by multiple customers across multiple regions, and with a renewed global focus on energy security, we see growing tailwinds into 2027 to drive positive dayrate momentum.” Take the spotlight and anchor your brand in the heart of the offshore world! Join us for a bigger impact and amplify your presence at the core hub of the offshore energy community!
Dutch cable manufacturer TKF has secured a contract from Vattenfall and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners […] The post TKF to supply inter-array cables for 1 GW Dutch offshore wind farm appeared first on Offshore Energy .
Dutch cable manufacturer TKF has secured a contract from Vattenfall and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP) for the supply of inter-array cables for the first phase of the Zeevonk offshore wind project in the Netherlands. Back in 2023, Vattenfall and TKF signed a multi-year framework agreement for 66 kV inter-array cables that applies to all fixed-bottom European offshore wind farms developed by Vattenfall. The agreement, signed in the fourth quarter of 2023, has an initial duration of three years and can be extended by five more years. The contract for the Zeevonk project covers the design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and supply of around 162 kilometers of 66 kV inter-array cables, including associated accessories and project management services. The cables will be manufactured at TKF’s facility in Eemshaven. The agreement includes the use of lower-emission and recycled materials, including low-emission aluminum, recycled steel and recycled copper, alongside a bitumen-free cable design aimed at reducing the environmental footprint of the project. Zeevonk will be built approximately 63 to 84 kilometers off the Dutch coast, near Bergen aan Zee, and will cover an area of around 650 square kilometers. The joint venture between Vattenfall and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners won the rights for the 2 GW Zeevonk site (IJmuiden Ver Beta)in a tender in 2024. Immediately after securing the site, the partners announced that the offshore wind project would incorporate multiple technologies, as per the Dutch tender requirements for that offshore area. In 2025, the partners saidthe project would be built in two phases. The first Zeevonk phase is scheduled to deliver 1 GW of offshore wind capacity by 2029, while the second phase, targeted for completion in 2032, will add another 1 GW of offshore wind and 500 MW of system integration capacity, including an electrolyzer in the Port of Rotterdam to support green hydrogen production. At the end of 2024,Google signed a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners for 250 MWof energy capacity from the Zeevonk offshore wind project. Take the spotlight and anchor your brand in the heart of the offshore world! Join us for a bigger impact and amplify your presence at the core hub of the offshore energy community!
Kaylee Gendron from Plymouth South softball is the newest Old Colony Memorial Athlete of the Week. Now, it's time to vote for the next winner.
Kaylee Gendronis the newest Old Colony Memorial Athlete of the Week, picking up 53% of the vote. ThePlymouth Southjunior had a day for herself on May 1 as part of a 13-1 softball win over Hingham. She slugged two home runs in addition to picking up the win on the circle. Gendron has helped South out to a 10-2 start as well as a comfortable lead in the chase for the Patriot League title. Congratulations Kaylee and to all of the nominees. Coaches, please email me atdwolcott@wickedlocal.comwith nominations for Athlete of the Week along with a brief description of their accomplishments.Voting is unlimited and it closes every Sunday at noon. More:South Shore track coach remembered as someone who valued every athlete With that said, here are this week’s Athlete of the Week nominees for May 4-10, 2026. Polisky powered Plymouth South to a 1-0 win May 7 at Marshfield High. In his first varsity start on the mound, the right-hander allowed only two hits and struck out six to get the shutout. Stasinos got the win May 7, pitching all five innings in a 16-2 victory over Scituate. She was also 3-for-5 at the plate with three RBI and a run scored. The trio placed first in the discus relay at the Division 3 MIAA state relays on May 3 at Oliver Ames High School. Davies placed second overall with her throw of 118-2.75. The senior captain did not lose a game at first singles in recent wins over Quincy High and then Pembroke as the Panthers continued their march to clinching a tournament spot. Plymouth South started the week tied with Scituate in first place at the top of the Fisher Division. Adair ended things against Whitman-Hanson on May 5 with a walk-off bunt in the bottom of the eighth inning of a 1-0 win. Adair was also 3-for-3 with 2 RBI on May 1 as part of a 4-1 win over North Quincy. Meyer led the way with a 6-1, 6-1 victory at first singles May 5 as part of a 4-1 win over Whitman-Hanson. The poll includes players from Plymouth North, Plymouth South, and the Rising Tide Charter School. Votes are unlimited. Voting closes each Sunday at noon. Emailed votes will not be counted.
Porti liguri e ferrovia, l’AdSp accelera sull’intermodalità Messaggero Marittimo
GENOVA – Il futuro della logistica italiana passa sempre di più dalla ferrovia e dall’integrazione tra porti, infrastrutture e imprese. È il messaggio emerso durante il convegno “Insieme, sui binari del futuro”, promosso da A.I.FERR e dedicato al ruolo delle piccole e medie imprese nella realizzazione delle opere infrastrutturali, al quale ha partecipato anche l’Autorità di Sistema portuale del Mar Ligure Occidentale. Nel corso dell’incontro, il presidente dell’AdSp, Matteo Paroli, ha evidenziato come il potenziamento del trasporto ferroviario rappresenti oggi una priorità strategica per aumentare competitività e sostenibilità del sistema portuale nazionale. Attualmente i porti di Genova e Savona-Vado movimentano su ferro poco più del 13% delle merci, una quota ancora distante dall’obiettivo europeo del 30%, ma che l’Autorità punta a incrementare attraverso nuovi investimenti e interventi infrastrutturali.
Paroli ha sottolineato che il trasferimento del traffico merci dalla strada alla ferrovia consente non solo una maggiore efficienza logistica, ma anche benefici ambientali concreti, grazie alla riduzione delle emissioni, del traffico pesante e della congestione urbana. In quest’ottica si inserisce il piano di investimenti da oltre 190 milioni di euro avviato dall’AdSp insieme a RFI e allo Stato per rafforzare i collegamenti ferroviari di ultimo miglio e i nodi strategici portuali. Tra gli interventi principali richiamati dal presidente figurano il potenziamento delle gallerie ferroviarie di uscita dal porto di Genova, la nuova stazione ferroviaria di Fuori Muro, gli adeguamenti infrastrutturali nel porto di Sampierdarena e il Parco Rugna, operativo dal Maggio 2025 e considerato uno dei progetti ferroviari più avanzati del sistema portuale ligure.
Nel suo intervento, Paroli ha inoltre richiamato il mutato scenario internazionale, osservando come le difficoltà della logistica nord-europea e gli effetti dei cambiamenti climatici possano aprire nuove opportunità per i porti mediterranei. Secondo il presidente, il sistema logistico ligure deve essere pronto a cogliere questa fase favorevole rafforzando l’integrazione tra porto e ferrovia per consolidare il ruolo dei porti del Mar Ligure all’interno delle reti europee di trasporto.
Durante la sessione dedicata allo sviluppo territoriale, il capo di gabinetto dell’Authority, Silvio Fremura, ha ripercorso il legame storico tra porto e ferrovia, ricordando come la crescita delle aree portuali genovesi sia stata fin dall’origine strettamente connessa allo sviluppo ferroviario. Un rapporto che continua a rappresentare uno degli elementi chiave per la competitività dello scalo ligure. Fremura ha evidenziato come le opere in corso nei quattro bacini del sistema portuale possano diventare veri nodi strategici per favorire il collegamento delle merci verso il Nord Italia e il Centro Europa, ampliando il raggio d’azione commerciale dei porti liguri e rafforzandone il peso nelle reti logistiche continentali. Ha inoltre posto l’attenzione sul valore del know-how industriale italiano e sul contributo delle imprese ferroviarie, considerate fondamentali per sostenere crescita, innovazione e continuità degli investimenti.
Foto: AdSp Mar Ligure Occiedentale
LEGGI ANCHE:
The UK prime minister is set to give a speech on Monday in a bid to convince the public of his leadership.
Save Share United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer is fighting for his political survival amid calls from parliamentarians for him to step down following the Labour Party’s stunning loss in local elections. In a make-or-break speech on Monday, Starmer took responsibility for the “very tough” results, promising to “face up to the big challenges” and “make the Labour case” for a “stronger, fairer Britain”. Admitting that Labour had made mistakes, he argued that its big political choices had been correct, including not being dragged into the US-Israel war on Iran. He pointed to reductions in National Health Service (NHS) waiting lists, child poverty and immigration, saying “the fundamentals are sound”. “We’re not just facing dangerous times, but dangerous opponents,” Starmer said, adding, “We’re battling Reform and the Greens, but at a deeper level, we’re battling the despair on which they prey. Despair that they exploit and amplify.” He said neither Reform UK’s Nigel Farage nor the Green Party’s Zack Polanski “offer the serious, progressive leadership that these times demand”. Starmer described Labour as “a mainstream party of power, not protest” and said the government would introduce legislation to take ownership of British Steel and be defined by rebuilding the UK’s relationship with Europe. He also promised a “guaranteed offer of a job, training or work placement for every young person looking for a job”. He added that “standing shoulder to shoulder with the countries that most share our interests” was “the right choice for Britain”. In the wake of last week’s election defeat, which saw Labour lose more than 1,400 councillors in England, largely to Reform UK and the Greens, backbencher Labour MP Catherine West urged cabinet ministers to “move quickly” to replace Starmer. She said she would email her colleagues for the necessary support on Monday if no one else put themselves forward. Following Starmer’s speech, the former junior minister said the address was “too little, too late”. “What is best for the party and country now is for an orderly transition,” she said. “I am hereby giving notice to No 10 that I am collecting names of Labour MPs to call on the prime minister to set a timetable for the election of a new leader in September.” More than 30 Labour MPs have said Starmer should resign or set out a timetable for his departure, including his former ally Josh Simons, who wrote in The Times that Starmer had “lost the country”. Labour MP David Smith released a statement shortly after his speech, saying he believed it was “now the time” for Starmer to “set a clear timetable for his departure”. The North Northumberland MP called for a return to being a party of the working class and for Labour to “be more radical” in its solutions. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said voters had sent Starmer a clear message. “Britain needs a bold new direction, but he keeps delivering the same old speech,” he said. He added that the government must end the cost-of-living crisis by “getting rid of Keir Starmer’s red lines on Europe and fixing the botched Brexit deal, including a customs union”. Meanwhile, Labour MP Paulette Hamilton said the party “may as well hand in the keys to No 10 now if we don’t change our leader soon”. The MP for Birmingham Erdington told Channel 5’s Jeremy Vine programme that she was “a loyalist” but called for an “orderly transition”. She said the local elections saw “people just put their votes anywhere except Labour”. However, in his speech, Starmer noted the “chaos of constantly changing leaders” under previous Conservative governments, and said the Labour government “would never be forgiven for inflicting that on our country again”. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn speared the prime minister’s speech in a post on X, pointing to the government’s decisions to cut welfare to “spend even more on weapons and war”, and its delay in scrapping the two-child benefit tax credit cap. He also noted that the government had chosen “not to bring water into public ownership, not to tax wealth and not to implement rent controls”. “The government chose to arm Israel and participate in genocide,” he said, and “chose to let the US use British air bases for its war crimes in Iran”. Others remain supportive of the prime minister, however, including Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who told Sky News that she did not believe “a leadership contest and all of the problems that that would bring is the answer”. In an op-ed in The Guardian on Friday, Starmer noted that while it was important to respond to the message voters sent, “that doesn’t mean tacking right or left”. Starmer appointed former Prime Minister Gordon Brown and former deputy Labour leader Baroness Harman to key government positions on Saturday in what is seen as a bid to shore up support. A leadership contest requires the endorsement of 81 Labour MPs. Potential challengers to the leadership include Health Secretary Wes Streeting, former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham. Starmer’s government has been in power since 2024, when it ended 14 years of Conservative rule in a landslide victory. His popularity has since fallen, with the decision to cut the winter fuel allowance amid a cost-of-living crisis and the scandal over United States Ambassador Peter Mandelson’s links to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein contributing to the decline. During this time, support has grown for right-wing Reform UK, and the Green Party under progressive Polanski, who has been vocal in his criticism of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.
Ecosuntek - Eco Trade porta il fotovoltaico nel Porto di Ravenna Websim
La controllata e Renco S.p.A. stanno completando la realizzazione, tramite la joint venture paritetica Adriasol, di un impianto a terra da 37,16 MW Photo by bombermoon/Getty Images Novità in casaEcosuntek. Il gruppo - attivo nella produzione e vendita di energia rinnovabile - ha comunicato venerdì cheEco Trade(controllata al 51%) eRenco S.p.A.stanno completando la realizzazione, tramite la joint venture paritetica Adriasol, di unimpiantofotovoltaico a terra da 37,16 MW situato nel porto di Ravenna. L’infrastruttura, attualmente in fase finale di costruzione, prevede l'entrata in esercizio nel secondo semestre 2026e unaproduzione annua attesa di circa 53 GWh. Parliamo di un valore in grado di coprire i fabbisogni energetici annui di circa 20.000 famiglie e che permette di evitare emissioni di oltre 25.000 tonnellate annue di CO2 equivalenti. L’energia prodotta, in particolare, sarà destinata principalmente al sistema di cold ironing, ossia quello che consente la fornitura elettrica da terra alle navi all'ormeggio, con priorità a quelle da crociera presso le banchine di Porto Corsini. Invece, la produzione eccedente sarà immessa in rete e gestita da Eco Trade. Il progetto si è aggiudicato i meccanismi di supporto alla transizione verde previsti daldecreto FER X, beneficiando di una tariffa incentivante per 20 anni, e ha ottenuto uncontributo a fondo perduto pari a 7,6 milioni di euronell’ambito delPNRR. "L’impianto del Porto di Ravenna, per il quale Eco Trade si occuperà anche del dispacciamento dell’energia prodotta, è posizionato in una area del Paese fortemente strategica e rappresenta per il nostro gruppo un importante step di crescita per la Business Unit relativa alla Power Generation - ha sottolineatoMatteo Minelli, amministratore delegato di Ecosuntek -Questo conferma l’approccio innovativo e all’avanguardia che caratterizza la cultura aziendale, con iniziative ambiziose e sostenibili, strettamente integrate con il tessuto economico e sociale del territorio". "Giudichiamo positivamente la notizia, che congiuntamente allapipelinedi nuovi progetti coltivata da Ecosuntek (impianti per 29MWp verranno realizzati nel 2026 e ulteriori 29MWp di progetti agrivoltaici cantierabili sono in attesa di finanziamento), proietta il gruppo verso unulteriore e significativo aumento della potenza installata- ha commentatoWebsim Corporate- Al riguardo, ricordiamo che attualmente la società detiene e gestisce un portafoglio di impianti fotovoltaici aventi una potenza complessiva superiore a 17 MWp ed una capacità di generazione annua prossima a 18 GWh". Gli analisti hanno una visione positiva sul titolo:rating BUY e target price a 4,75 euro.Adesso l'attenzione è rivolta alla pubblicazione dei risultati 2025 di Ecosuntek, prevista per il 26 maggio. Advertisement Per informazioni su natura e caratteristiche dei contenuti di Websim.it, si prega di leggere attentamente la sezioneAvvertenze. Questo pannello ti permette di esprimere le tue preferenze relative al trattamento delle tue informazioni personali.Puoi rivedere o modificare le tue scelte in qualsiasi momento accedendo al registropreferenze cookie. Per rifiutare il tuo consenso alle attività di trattamento utilizza il pulsante “Accetta solo i necessari”.
Norwegian energy data and intelligence provider TGS has landed a new assignment in the United States (U.S.), which will enable it to advance ocean bottom node (OBN) ultra‑high resolution seismic data in the Gulf of America (U.S. Gulf of Mexico). The post TGS on ultra-high resolution OBN mission in US Gulf appeared first on Offshore Energy .
Norwegian energy data and intelligence provider TGS has landed a new assignment in the United States (U.S.), which will enable it to advance ocean bottom node (OBN) ultra‑high resolution seismic data in the Gulf of America (U.S. Gulf of Mexico). As TGS has secured an award for an ultra-high resolution OBN contract in the Gulf of America, a deepwater crew is scheduled to mobilize in early June 2026. Kristian Johansen, CEO of TGS, commented:“We are very pleased to secure this ultra-high resolution OBN contract. This is part of a long-term agreement and as such we have worked extensively together with our client on survey design solutions. “This award shows the value the long-term agreement has for both our client and TGS, reducing planning time, ensuring availability and applying new technology. The long-term agreement ensures that the same crew which the client used before, will execute the work, ensuring continuity from an HSEQ and operational perspective.” This deal followsa recent long-term extensionof a multi-year OBN acquisition assignment in the Gulf of America, after TGSembarked ona multi-client long-offset OBN program in the U.S. Gulf. Take the spotlight and anchor your brand in the heart of the offshore world! Join us for a bigger impact and amplify your presence at the core hub of the offshore energy community!
La compagnia giapponese firma per le nuove navi una commessa da 1,2 miliardi di dollari L'articolo One ordina ai cantieri coreani Hyundai 6 portacontainer da 16.000 Teu proviene da Shipping Italy .
Il mercato delle nuove costruzioni delle navi commerciali è diventato selettivo con armatori che investono solo in tecnologie in grado di garantire la rispondenza alle normative sulla decarbonizzazione per i prossimi 20 anni.
Questa tendenza, che unisce la prudenza strategica alla necessità della transizione ecologica, è confermata dalla notizia odierna dell’acquisto di sei navi da 15.900 Teu da parte della compagnia singaporiana One (Ocean Network Express). L’intenzione iniziale, come riportato da splash247.com, prevedeva in realtà un ordine molto più importante di 22 navi per un importo superiore ai 4 miliardi di dollari presso la coreana Hd Hyundai Heavy Industries. La firma per ‘sole’ sei unità indica che, nonostante il desiderio di crescere, l’incertezza sui noli e l’attuale situazione geopolitica stiano condizionando gli armatori dirigendoli verso soluzioni più ponderate.
Più precisamente, Hd Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering ha annunciato l’accordo la scorsa settimana, di un contratto che riguarda sei portacontainer dual-fuel alimentate a Gnl da 15.900 Teu. Le unità hanno un prezzo di circa 203,5 milioni di dollari ciascuna, per un investimento complessivo di 1,22 miliardi di dollari. Le navi verranno consegnate tra novembre 2028 e settembre 2029, andando ad integrare la flotta green di One.
Negli ultimi tre anni, la compagnia si è dimostrata tra le più attive nel mercato dual-fuel, avendo commissionato oltre 30 unità di questo tipo presso cantieri cinesi e sudcoreani. La strategia del gruppo è diversificata: da un lato le navi da 13.000 Teu (e superiori) alimentate a metanolo ordinate presso Jiangnan Shipyard e Yangzijiang Shipbuilding; dall’altro la serie di unità da oltre 15.000 Teu alimentate a Gnl affidate a Hd Hyundai.
Il costo di circa 203,5 milioni di dollari per singola nave rappresenta una cifra molto elevata — sensibilmente superiore a quella di una nave tradizionale della stessa taglia — e sottolinea quanto pesi l’investimento nelle tecnologie a basso impatto ambientale. One si dichiara però disposta a pagare questo sovrapprezzo per non farsi trovare impreparata di fronte alle normative ambientali del futuro.
L’operazione arriva in un momento di transizione interna: Jeremy Nixon, storico amministratore delegato di One, lascerà la guida tra meno di due mesi. Questo ordine da 1,2 miliardi rappresenta probabilmente uno degli ultimi grandi atti della sua gestione. Sarà Till Ole Barrelet a succedergli al vertice della compagnia, attualmente al sesto posto nel ranking mondiale dei vettori di container (Alphaliner).
La compagnia Ocean Network Express, fondata nel 2017 dall’integrazione delle attività di linea delle giapponesi “K” Line, Mol e Nyk, opera oggi con una flotta in fase di modernizzazione avanzata e una capacità complessiva che supera i 2 milioni di Teu.
ISCRIVITI ALLA NEWSLETTER QUOTIDIANA GRATUITA DI SHIPPING ITALY
SHIPPING ITALY E’ ANCHE SU WHATSAPP: BASTA CLICCARE QUI PER ISCRIVERSI AL CANALE ED ESSERE SEMPRE AGGIORNATI
New Wave Offshore Energy, Texas-headquartered marine consultants, has been tasked with a marine warranty services (MWS) assignment for an oil and gas deepwater development off the coast of Brazil, which is operated by Shell Brasil Petróleo (Shell Brasil), a subsidiary of the UK-headquartered energy giant Shell. The post New Wave Offshore Energy gets mission-critical oversight job on Shell’s Brazilian oil & gas project appeared first on Offshore Energy .
New Wave Offshore Energy, Texas-headquartered marine consultants, has been tasked with a marine warranty services (MWS) assignment for an oil and gas deepwater development off the coast of Brazil, which is operated by Shell Brasil Petróleo (Shell Brasil), a subsidiary of the UK-headquartered energy giant Shell. New Wave Offshore Energy has been selected as the marine warranty surveyor for Shell’sOrcaproject, formerly known as Gato do Mato, in the pre-salt Santos Basin offshore Brazil. While explaining that this“major”MWS contract fortifies its reputation as a trusted MWS partner for complex offshore developments, the U.S. company explains that the deal encompasses risk management and safety oversight support for the project. The firm’s scope of work for the development, which is estimated to have recoverable resource volumes of approximately 370 million barrels, involves marine warranty services across multiple phases of the project, including vessel surveys, engineering review, and oversight of transportation and installation (T&I) operations. The Texas-headquartered player will provide an impartial review of the operation to ensure the agreed project warranties are met while delivering value-added expertise. The contract expands New Wave Offshore’s portfolio of MWS work, which has been on the firm’s services menu since 2018, reinforcing the company’s commitment to providing high-value marine assurance across all types of offshore energy projects. Kyle Eddings, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, commented:“This award clearly validates our technical depth and operational discipline.Being chosen by Shell formarinewarranty services affirms the confidence the industry is placing in our ability to execute offshore projects with integrity and attention to detail. “We are proud to see our core philosophy, that a highly technical team of honest and dedicated professionals delivers unparalleled value to our clients, recognized at this level.” This content is available after accepting the cookies. Shell chooses Valaris drillship for drilling ops at giant oil & gas project in Brazilian waters The Orca project is a unitized development covering theBM-S-54concession agreement and theSul de Orcaproduction sharing agreement (CPP). Currently, the partners are Shell (operator with a 70% stake), Ecopetrol (30%), and Pré-Sal Petróleo S.A. (PPSA) as the CPP manager. Orca’s partners made thefinal investment decision for the project in March 2025. Once the sale of apartial stake is completed, the ownership structure will change, with Shell remaining as the operator with a reduced interest (50%), while its partners will be Ecopetrol (30%) and KUFPEC (20%). Vallourec wascontractedto supply line pipes for the project and TechnipFMC washired forthe integrated engineering, procurement, construction, and installation (iEPCI) work. Designed to produce up to 120,000 barrels of oil per day (boepd), the project’s start-up is scheduled for 2029. Take the spotlight and anchor your brand in the heart of the offshore world! Join us for a bigger impact and amplify your presence at the core hub of the offshore energy community!
We have plenty of land, data centers provide more revenue per unit area than any other building, and we should have way less farmland
A few weeks ago I shared my axis of which data center concerns I think are most real and fake: I’ve already coveredwater use,water poisoning, andinfrasounds. There’s one fake issue left to address: land use. Like biographies use their subject as a prism for the world around them, I use data centers as a prism for much larger but invisible environmental problems, hidden by our tendencies toward populism and localism that data centers offend. This post focuses on the ridiculous ways we use land in America, which (like most of our water issues) is downstream of farmers being shielded from popular criticism by political alliances and folk intuitions about the honest toil of growing food. By the end, I hope you’ll be much more skeptical of headlines like this: and of the idea that data centers purchasing farmland is a unique evil. I’m not claiming data centers should be built anywhere and everywhere.There are lots of places where they’ve been built too close to people’s homes. This post is about whether data centers waste the land they’re on relative to what they compete with, and my claim is that they mostly don’t compete with things we need more of (housing) and mostly compete with things we need less of (farmland). Data centers are the absolute most optimized use of land physically possible America isn’t lacking in land Data centers mostly don’t compete with housing The fact that data centers don’t create many jobs makes their land use way smaller What about the land use of new power and transmission capacity data centers will require? Data centers free up lots of land elsewhere It is not a crime against locals to raise their land value We have way too much farmland Question farmers About 1.5% of the contiguous United States is used for a farmer handout: ethanol A lot of people are really bad at thinking about farms in a marginal rather than an absolute way What about the effects of climate change on farmable land? More evidence we have too much farmland More examples of the goofy ways our politics and land use is warped by farmers Conclusion Some bad recent articles on data center land use “Farmer Hailed as Hero for Rejecting Huge Payment to Turn His Land Into a Giant Data Center” A data center using as much land as 51 Walmarts “This Land is Their Land” No other large buildings are crammed this full of objects optimized down to the atom for maximum performance.The most advanced supply chains in the worldwork together to push the servers inside data centers as close to the physical limits of manufacturing as anything we make. Northern Virginia has 13% of all global data center capacity, andLoudoun County has by far the largest concentration. But data centers only take up3% of Loudoun’s land, and they generate38% of all county general fund revenue. Using county tax info, I roughly estimated combined real- and personal-property tax revenue per unit land area (including land around the buildings data center companies own) for data centers vs. other major Loudoun revenue sources. Comparisons like this get a little ridiculous. There’s also By 2028, all data centers in America will occupy roughly 1,400 square miles. This is about0.3% as much as America’s prime farmland. The vast majority of this will be land around the data center, the buildings themselves will collectively take up about 25 square miles, 0.005% of America’s prime farmland.1 Here’s a chart of how America currently uses land: 1,400 square miles is about 3.5 squares here, 3.5x as much as the land we currently dedicate to Christmas trees: With the buildings themselves taking up an incredibly small part of that: By 2030, data center buildings themselves will take up 1/15th of the land area we use to grow Christmas trees. Data centers are uneconomical to build way far out in completely undeveloped land,since they need access to reliable large power grids. But they alsodon’t need to be built in or near dense residential areas. The vast majority of the contiguous US is within reach of high power lines, and the places data centers are built are mostly farmland or low-value scrub. Some people worry that data centers take up land that could be used for housing instead, but data center companies want fundamentally different land than where housing shortages exist. Housing demand is overwhelmingly concentrated in and near existing urban cores, like California, the Boston-to-DC corridor where I live, Seattle, Denver, Austin, or Nashville. These are expensive because demand concentrates in specific neighborhoods already built out.The blockers on housing in those places are zoning, parking minimums, height limits, environmental review, neighborhood opposition, and the general legal apparatus that makes it illegal to build apartment buildings on most residential land in America. It’s rarely access to raw land. Data centerswant flat, cheap, large amounts of land with access to high-voltage transmission, fiber, and water for cooling, in places that permit a windowless industrial building. Anywhere with significant housing demand has land too expensive for large data centers.Data centers are mostly only built in exurban and rural land on the fringes of metro areas. If a new business that requires lots of workers moves into a town, lots of new residents have to move there too. This creates demand for massive land use changes. There will be more homes, commercial buildings, public services, and roads. I don’t think this is bad, but for people worried about land use changes in a specific area, a data center has a much lighter impact per unit of revenue because it needsso few employees. A town allowing a large data center to be built is like buying a very large computer that hums in the background generating tax revenue with minimal maintenance. It doesn’t require reconfiguring the town the way a new large industry or commercial center would. Data centers are ideal for small towns that need lots of additional tax revenue but don’t want to have to deal with the infrastructure costs of having a lot of new people move there at once. By 2028, US data centers are projected to use around 450 TWh of energy per year (the middle ofLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s 325–580 TWh range, with most other major forecasts clustering nearby). Data centers runwith high load factors(meaning load is essentially flat and high 24/7) so 450 TWh annuallyworks out tomaybe 55 GW once you includegrid losses. If served by firm power sources you’d need somewhere around 65–80 GW, or more if it’s coming from intermittent renewables. The land footprint depends heavily on what gets built. Just getting to 450 TWh with solar would require ~1,500–2,000 square miles of panels2, and delivering that as reliable 24/7 power would require 1.5-3x as much, plus storage and batteries. So if data centers were all served by solar, they’d require maybe 2,500-5,000 additional square miles. Wind requires way less land (unless you’re worried about infrasound…) but it seems unlikely to be a big part of data center power. Natural gas plants are very land-efficient. One large new plant generates about 1 MW per 0.05 acres, and this drops to ~0.01 acres per MW if you just look at the buildings themselves. 80 GW of new natural gas would need between 12-40 square miles of plant sites depending on how you measure. I’d almost always prefer using more land to emitting more, so I’m not excited about gas and discouraged by the scale of new gas demand data centers are adding. Nuclear is similarly compact, at about an acre per MW for the plant. I’d be much more excited about nuclear power serving data centers, but that seems unlikely in the short term. A reasonable range for the additional power-generation land footprint is 50 to 1,000 square miles. This is significant but doesn’t dramatically change the picture. Adding it to the ~1,400 square miles of data center land for 2028 brings us to a maximum of 2,400 square miles. Definitely not nothing! But this means that all data centers, the land around them, and the power plants serving them would together come to at most 5% of the land used for ethanol, and roughly 0.08% of the contiguous US. Transmission is harder to estimate, and it has the one land-use problem I think is real: utilities using eminent domain to route new lines through people’s property. I expect serious conflicts here. But transmission is also where data centers are most plausibly positive-sum.The green energy transition already requires roughly doubling US high-voltage transmission capacity by 2050. Data center demand mostly accelerates a buildout that had to happen anyway, and a line built to serve a data center cluster also moves clean power to everyone else on it. The eminent domain cost is real and serious, but it probably has to happen anyway. Farmers in other countries are far more likely to be seriously harmed by climate change, the green transition is necessary to fight it, and we need to pull a few eminent domain levers to enable it. The net positive effects of data centers forcing way more high-voltage transmission will outweigh the negatives, even though here the negatives are real. The US hasabout 430 square miles retail real estate, or roughly 430 square miles, and double that if you include the parking lots. Mall vacancies hitrecord highs in the 2010s, because people buy online instead. Amazon now operates about 11 square miles total of warehouse space, handling a large portion of all American retail sales. Hundreds of square miles of physical retail floor space and parking have been replaced by a few dozen square miles of warehouses, and a small fraction of that in data centers running the website, payments, and logistics. There were about 100,000 bank branches at the 2009 peak. Today there arearound 70,000 and fallingbecause most banking moved into apps. Other things like travel agencies, photo labs, video rental, music stores, bookstore chains, paper-map publishers, have all either disappeared or sharply contracted, along with their land use. On net, data centers have freed up way more land than they use. Data centers have also enabled way more people to work from home, causing office demand to crater. Is this all good? I’m not sure. Maybe it’s preferable to have malls over Amazon warehouses, or physical video stores over streaming. But regardless, the main effect of data centers on US land use has been to free up incredible amounts of land relative to the ~25 square miles they sit on. Most conversations about data centers only focus on the physical footprint of the buildings themselves without considering just how many other buildings they’ve made unnecessary. A surprisingly common complaint in news stories about data centers buying land is that they raise the price of land around them. In reading about bad environmental effects of industry, I’m used to reading stories of ugly industries moving in and lowering the value of land nearby. This is a problem because Americans have so much of their savings tied up in the value of their land and homes. The land value of farms specifically is a huge percentage of farmers’ total wealth. I’m not used to reading stories complaining that a new industry moved in and made nearby land way too valuable. Data center effects on nearby land is really understudied. The few studies that have been done seem inconclusive, and have only focused on the effects of home prices specifically.The most thorough studylooked at home sales in Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William counties near data center alley in 2023. The found that homes closer to data centers sold for higher prices, and their model (controlling for 13 factors that usually push up home prices) explained about 87% of price variance. The authors guessed that maybe this was because data centers cluster near the same infrastructure that makes housing valuable, and that a lot of data centers are tucked into places residents don’t even notice. The authors warned against generalizing too much from this study, especially in looser housing markets. The potential way data centers make rural land around them more valuable is pretty straightforward: they’re willing to pay way more for land, pushing up the potential price for nearby land that has the same qualities data centers might be interested in in the future. If a data center causes a location’s grid and fiber to be built out, everything around it also becomes more valuable to future data centers. Raising land prices benefits land owners and harms people who want to buy land. Lowering land prices harms land owners and benefits people who want to buy land. Which one is “right”? It depends on who you’re considering. In general, the locals who own land in the area where a data center is built benefit when their land goes up in value. Because Americans (especially rural farmers) have so much wealth tied up in their land, this often increases the wealth of people in the community where the data center is built. The two complaints that usually pop up are that this raises local’s property taxes and that it makes it harder to buy land. The property tax issue is real, but the same thing happens whenever any high value industry sets up in a rural area. Many states solve this with tax policy that taxes agricultural land based on its use-value, or other things like creates homestead exemptions or assessment caps. In states like Indiana that do this, when data centers are built, farmers nearby get immediately wealthier without having to pay more in taxes. New buyers being priced out is also a real problem, but it’s a problem with making any place in America more desirable to live. Is the solution to keep rural land cheap by making sure nothing economically valuable ever happens there? Building anything new in an area at all have some effect on local land values. Would you rather an industry raise or lower the value of the land around it? If you saw a headline that said “Data center built, lowers the value of everyone’s property around it” would you be mad? If so, it’s weird to also be upset that data centers are raising the value of people’s property. I think what’s happening here is that both involve trade-offs, and winners and losers (alternatively, the land owners or the people who want to buy land), and in both it’s very easy to focus exclusively on the loser while ignoring the winner. This leads to people being mad when a data center lowers property values, but also when it increases them. Loss aversion is often inherently change aversion. A clear example of how strangely this issue is talked about in the media is this section of a More Perfect Union video (this one, at 2:00). They interview a local farmer, who complains that the land around him has become so expensive that he can’t buy more farmland to “feed more people.” They then talk to a guy explaining how new businesses can’t buy land there because the land’s become so valuable. More Perfect Union frames this as “increasing costs,” but it’s increasing costs by making the locals way richer. The farmer’s complaint is that the data centers made his neighbors so much richer that they don’t want to make a deal anymore, and it’d be easier to buy their land if they were poorer and were more willing to sell it off. This is a bizarre complaint. In no other circumstance would we hear someone say “I would like to own more of my community’s land, but this evil company moved in and made all my neighbors so much more wealthy that they don’t want to sell to me anymore” and be sympathetic. But as we’ll explore in detail in the next section, farming has a weird halo effect where it warps our usual thinking about what’s fair. Farmers have the same combination of virtues and vices as the rest of us. But I think farmers (like any profession with a big positive halo) benefit so much from popular narratives that they get away with more environmental and economic harm, and their halo makes them harder to regulate and criticize. By the end of this section, I’d like you to share my intuition that it’s pretty normal and fine for farmers to sell their land to data centers (or solar power plants) if they want to. These are two private actors making an economic decision that might make sense for both of them. There isn’t some deep evil happening when farmer land is converted to a data center. Farming should be treated as one industry among many, that we can criticize or praise like any other industry, and that shouldn’t get special treatment or handouts because of the inherent virtue of toiling in the soil. Once you start writing about any environmental issue, especially water, you quickly discover that farmers occupy a special place in American discourse where both right and left refuse to criticize them, because “they grow our food.” People have a simplistic idea of the inherent virtue of farming compared to other professions. This is how you getviral clips of local farmers “bravely” saying no to a data center company politely offering to buy their land for 10x what it’s worth, and reactions like this when you politely point out this is a little overblown: Cultural conditioning has trained us to see the good rooted people standing up to the far-off unrooted elites as always in the right. You can sometimes sneak in criticisms of farmers by referring to them as “big ag,” but this term ignores small farmers, who are not without fault. I was happy tosee Tomi Lahren come out strong against the horrific “Save Our Bacon” act. It’s nice to see animal welfare becoming depolarized. But even here she danced around the main issue, and imply that it’s not the small farmers who are at fault, it’s the Chinese: In reality, pig welfare on small American-owned farms is often just as bad as on large ones. Once you see that people often find it offensive to criticize farmers at all, you start seeing it everywhere.Take this story from last year: As I’ve talked about before, in Morrow County Oregon, an Amazon data center bought water from a source heavily polluted with nitrates, evaporated it, and sent the rest back to a wastewater treatment plant. Since nitrates don’t evaporate, the water sent to the treatment plant had a higher concentration.This likely raised nitrate concentration in the wastewater facility by less than 1%. Amazon was using a small fraction of the region’s water, but Futurism chose to superimpose cancer cells on data center server racks. They should have superimposed them on the main industry adding the nitrates: Farmers! For 35 years Oregon’s government has known nitrate pollution was worsening in the Lower Umatilla Basin, the only drinking-water aquifer for Morrow and Umatilla counties, and has known the main source was irrigated agriculture. For most of that time, the government response was just suggesting“voluntary best management practices” and “stakeholder engagement.”Meaningful enforcement waslimited to the Port of Morrow wastewater facility. By 2024,hundreds of domestic wells had tested above the federal nitrate limit, with some exceeding it 7x. Residents reported clusters of miscarriages, kidney failure, thyroid disease, and rare cancers. In 2022,Morrow County declared the first groundwater state of emergency in Oregon history. Why were farmers allowed to build up nitrate pollution in the water here for 35 years? In early 2025, state senator Khanh Pham introduced SB 747, whichwould have required farms over 200 acres (the largest 10%) to fill out a form telling the Oregon Department of Ag how much fertilizer they used, the kind, and the crop it was used for. The bill imposed no limits on fertilizer use.It did authorize civil penalties up to $10,000, but only for failing to file the form, or for being judged by ODA, after the fact, to be over-applying based on the reported data. Pham told the committee that “Senate Bill 747 does not impose restrictions. It simply collects data so agencies can provide better technical support, improve efficiency and prevent fertilizer waste.” About 75% of the testimony on the bill was opposed. The Farm Bureaucalled it a “fishing expedition” that turned family farmers into “boogeymen.”One rep told the committee that96% of Oregon’s farms are “family-owned and struggling.”“Family-owned” is basically meaningless: it means that any family, no matter how rich, owns the farm together. Walmart is a “family-owned” business.Farming families have slightly higher median incomes and way higher median wealth than Americans overall. Another complained the bill“arbitrarily targeted” large farms while ignoring “municipalities and urban homeowners,”even though in theLower Umatilla Basin specifically, agriculture and CAFOs together caused over 80% of the nitrate pollution. The farm coalition’s position was that being asked to share this simple information on dangerous pollutantswould be a ruinous burden. Rep. Bobby Levy was the most prominent voice opposing the bill. Her family’s farming business, Windy River, is inside Morrow County and the polluted aquifer the bill was meant to protect. She told the Senate committee that “making the suggestion that over application of fertilizer is widespread is both inaccurate and unfair.” The committee declined to schedule a work session before the deadline, and the bill quietly died without a vote. A month after Levy’s testimony, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality issued a citation identifying the Levy family farm as having over-applied fertilizer on its own corn fields throughout 2023, polluting the same aquifer the bill was meant to protect. This all happened under a Democratic trifecta and while the Morrow water crisis was on the front pages of Oregon newspapers. It happened because you basically can’t say ‘small farmers are part of the problem’ in American politics and expect to keep your job. At best, you can blame “big ag,” or maybe China, but the politics of farming is so crazy that farmers are a permanent third rail politicians won’t touch, even while they poison a local community. For any other industry, this would obviously be crazy, and every other industry has regulations on how much it can pollute water. But farmers are organized, numerous, and have silly folk theories about the inherent virtue of growing food on their side. Finally, in March 2026,the Oregon Department of Agriculture adopted the first ever mandatory nitrate management rules for the area. Even this only applies, to start, to farms over 1,000 acres, who don’t have to submit plans until May 2027. Farms between 500 and 1,000 acres will be phased in by May 2028, and smaller farms aren’t required tosubmit their plans to ODA, only to draft them and keep records.ODA only has one staffer to oversee the whole basin and will audit “as agency capacity allows.”The data center here served as a useful if unintentional scapegoat to distract from tthe people directly adding pollutants to the water. This fits a national pattern. The 1972 Clean Water act explicitly exempts“agricultural stormwater discharges and return flows from irrigated agriculture”(meaning nitrates, phosphorus, manure, and herbicides washed into a river or lake from a farm by rain) and requires no permit, monitoring, reporting, or upper limit. Farmers are not obligated to tell anyone how much nitrogen they use. This is regularly upheld by federal courts,most recently in 2025. Agriculture is by a wide margin the main source of nitrate pollution in the US in US water.12% of domestic water wells in agricultural areas exceed the federal nitrate MCL of 10 mg/L, versus 1% of public supply wells in non-agricultural areas. Nitrate concentrations in agricultural streams run about 6× higher than in undeveloped watersheds. When a rural well or a small-town water utility tests over the legal limit, the source, with rare exceptions, is corn, soy, or manure upstream. One peer reviewed estimate found that nitrates in drinking watercause between 2,300 and 12,500 cancer cases per year, four-fifths colorectal plus 3000 cases of very low birth weight, and 1700 very preterm births. They estimated that the total medical cost is between $250 million and $1.5 billion per year, plus $1.3 to 6.5 billion in lost productivity. A few obvious policies in the US could fix most of the problems with nitrates: Mandatory reporting, where every farm above some size submits annual plans for how much and where they’re using nitrates. Specific number limits on how much nitrates farmers can apply. Treating large farms as point sources for water pollution in the way the Clean Water Act treats other industries. Forcing farm polluters to pay the cost of water treatment. Stop subsidizing ethanol, which alone is responsible for roughly a tenth to a fifth of all nitrates in US water.3 Denmark, the Netherlands, and Germany all have major agricultural sectors that operate well under way stricter rules than anything on this list. The only reason we don’t have these rules is that farmers are more politically untouchable here. Every year, the federal government forces oil refiners to blend 15 billion gallons of corn ethanol into America’s gasoline supply. This usesabout 40% of all American corn. This is mandated by the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), and was sold as a policy to help address climate change. However, every argument for mandating corn ethanol is terrible, and the only reason it survives is that politicians cannot question farmers. The ethanol mandate wasoriginally presented in 2007 as a path to energy independence and lower greenhouse gas emissions. Both arguments kind of sort of made sense then. Oil prices were high and the US was dependent on Saudi Arabia for petroleum. Not good! Ethanol’s lifecycle emissions looked like they might fall below gasoline if ethanol replaced part of the supply. Other arguments at the time held that ethanol would cut NOx emissions or sequester carbon. But none of this is true now.Since the shale revolution, the US is now a net petroleum exporter. Studiesnow find that corn ethanol’s carbon intensity is at best roughly comparable to gasoline, and probably about 24% higher once you account for land-use change, nitrous oxide from fertilizer, and the conversion of grassland back into corn fields. Because ethanol’s made of corn, it also has a high water cost. Corn used for ethanol is responsible for around1–1.5 trillion gallons of withdrawals per yearfrom aquifers and lakes, this is ignoring any rainwater it might use. That’s about 3% ofall water withdrawn for US irrigated agriculture, for a stupid bad mandated product. I can’t help but add that this is roughly 40 times as much water as all the thousands of American data centers are forecast to consume onsite in 2028. Ethanol is generally more expensive than gasoline per unit of combustion energy. So on top of everything ethanol also increases gas prices. But what’s most shocking to me about ethanol is its land use. About 1.5% of the contiguous United States is used to grow corn for ethanol. Corn farms for ethanol specifically take up half as much space as all urban housing and commercial land. So why do we have this mandate? The only people who benefit are corn farmers, ethanol producers, and fertilizer and equipment providers. Like most bad laws, beneficiaries are concentrated and organized while those harmed are scattered and unorganized. Every American pays a tiny bit more for gas, the Gulf of Mexico absorbs more fertilizer runoff than it otherwise would, the climate as a whole has a little more CO2, aquifers are drained faster, but these harms are spread so thin across so many people that we don’t notice or get organized. In comparison, farmers notice what’s happening. They organize to keep the mandate, and no one bothers to oppose them, because it’s so politically toxic to criticize farmers. Compounding this, rural Midwestern communities are amplified in American politics by the electoral college and presidential primaries, and the Senate’s overweighting of low-population states. There’s a strong bipartisan voting bloc in midwestern politics that treats the ethanol mandate as a third rail that politicians cannot touch. So we’re stuck forcing oil companies to pay to support 1.5% of the contiguous United States being used for a stupid product no one wants. When you see people talking about how any business, be it a data center or a solar farm or anything else, is “taking away our farmland” and that “soon we won’t have any left,’ consider this. Farmers currently have an area the size of New York State, as large as half of all American urban areas (suburbs included), specially dedicated to growing a product oil companies are forced by the government to buy, that makes our gas more expensive and dirtier, with zero benefit to anyone outside the farmers themselves. In an ideal world, farmers would lose the surface area of New York State to companies who would make better use of it, or even shut down and be replaced with nothing so that we stopped wasting 4% of our agricultural water on a product no one wants that makes our lives and the climate worse. By 2028, all American data centers, including the land around them, will use about this much land compared to ethanol: Converting all the land used by ethanol in the US to utility-scale solar farms would generate roughly 11,000 terawatt-hours of electricity per year, about about 2.5–3x current US electricity use, or roughly 35% of total world electricity generation.4Consider this the next time you seenews stories of corn farmers getting mad that their land is being bought by solar plants. Solar plants and corn ethanol both have the same end-goal: generating usable energy. If you measure how much electricity solar panels generate vs how much energy is contained in the final corn ethanol product, and include all the energy costs of growing the corn, solar panels generate over 100x as much energy per unit area as corn farms used for ethanol over the same time period. This makes sense, because corn is in some sense just an extremely inefficient solar panel, slowly storing up energy from the sun to eventually release when it’s mixed in with gasoline. Fields of corn used for ethanol are kind of like very old-fashioned solar panels that are 60x less efficient than our current method.5 As a vegan, I do also have to highlight one other major land user: We use more land to grow food for the animals we eat than to grow plants we eat directly. Everyone going vegan wouldn’t free up all this land, because we’d need more land to grow fully nutritionally complete meals. The best estimates we have right now is that this would free up roughly 141,000 to 289,000 square miles of American cropland, depending on if we also cut animal feed exports. It would free up around1,250,000 square milesaltogether, because most of the land footprint of current American diets is pasture. We have too much land dedicated to farming. Some argue ethanol is actually good despite its negatives because it reduces NOx emissions, a harmful air pollutant. But this seems to no longer be true. Every US gas car built after 2017 has a catalytic converter that removes NOx from the exhaust to very low levels no matter what fuel you burn, so any small NOx benefit ethanol gives during combustion gets erased.A 2022 California study on 20 cars found no meaningful NOx difference between regular E10 gas and higher-ethanol gas, anda 2025 UC Riverside study found the same. It might be worse. The EPA now predicts ethanol blendingraisesNOx, smog-forming VOCs, and fine particulates compared to ethanol-free gas, because ethanol makes gasoline evaporate more easily. Andfor small engines that don’t have catalytic converters, like mowers, leaf blowers, or generators, the Department of Energy found ethanol blends raise NOx by 50–75%. Some people bring up that fossil fuels also use water to extract. That’s true, butethanol uses way more water per unit. When a data center or solar plant replaces a farm, the public conversation often turns to which product is more valuable in total. Would we rather have food, or silly computers? People will say things like “We can’t eat AI.” This is obviously ridiculous, because the question is never “Should we replace all farms with data centers?” It’s always “Should we replace one specific farm with a data center?” Because we farm way more than we need, and data centers are so efficient with their land use and in so much demand, the answer is often yes. Because we have way too much farmland, I would support replacing many corn or alfalfa (water-hungry and used mainly for animal feed) farms with nothing, never mind another building. People sometimes bring up soil quality and “prime farmland” as if it were sacred.Prime farmland in the USDA sense is a soil classification for land that could grow crops well 23% of the non-federal open land in the continental United States qualified as prime farmland. We don’t need every last piece of prime farmland actually farmed. We are not going to run out, and shouldn’t turn all of it into farms right now. It’s true that we can’t eat data centers, but we also can’t eat the corn grown on the New York State-sized chunk of land used for ethanol. The relevant question is always “Is this specific piece of land better used as a farm or a data center?” rather than “Should all farms be replaced with data centers?” The absolute all-or-nothing way of thinking about farms would justify tearing down all our cities and public infrastructure, because we don’t need anything else as much as food. A very common talking point when anyone suggests that we could use less farmland is “City boys think that food just comes from the store.” To use an outdated analogy, this feels equivalent to the government mandating that way too many copies of Grand Theft Auto get produced, and any time this gets criticized the main response being “Oh do you think games just magically appear at GameStop?” This talking point always assumes that saying the marginal farm shouldn’t exist is identical to saying all farms shouldn’t exist. Maybe this is all true now, but we may need to worry a lot more about farmland as climate change worsens, right? Under most mainstream forecasts, the US ends 2100 with roughly the same or modestly expanded total climatically suitable cropland area, but with the productive zone shifted 100 to 300 miles north of where it sits today.6This is still going to be wildly disruptive, because this will reshuffle what can be grown where, but on net the US will have the same or more total farmable land. The issue is going to be what can be grown where, not total access to farmland. There’s a viral talking point that the corn belt in the upper midwest will become unsuitable for corn by 2100. We’re not sure if this is true, becausecorn varieties have been continuously rebred for changing conditions for the last century. The corn grown in Iowa today is not the corn grown in Iowa in 1925, and that wasn’t the same corn grown in 1850. By 2100, after 74 more years of adaptation, it seems unlikely Iowa farmers won’t be able to grow corn.The Corn Belt-collapse literature mostly assumes static management.7 Climate change will create lots of other problems for US crops.Higher levels of CO2 in the air reduce the nutritional value of grain crops, so we’ll need to grow more food to get the same nutritional value. Water might become a more serious issue, and if the median climate forecasts are slightly off, a lot of formerly irrigated farmland won’t be useable because the water will be gone. This is a serious concern, but it’s mainly about water rather than raw access to land. I think the most serious response you could give here is that we’ll need more farmable land to feed theglobalpopulation stuck with way less farmable land. That’s fair, but the clearest way to free up land for this is to join me and others in our quest to end industrial animal agriculture. Buildings that will collectively take up under 100 square miles in the US won’t ruin farmable land. For theConservation Reserve Program, the federal governmentpays $1.85 billion a year to over 302,000 landownersto keep their collective 40,000 square miles of land idle. This is about the size of Kentucky, and 28x the projected 2028 footprint of all data center land in the US. CRP wascreated in 1985partly because farm groups were alarmed at how much food American agriculture was producing. Prices were low because too much was being grown, so the government started paying farmers to grow nothing. Since then the justification has shifted more toward environmental issues, but the program still runs mainly because the country produces more food than it can sell at prices farmers want. The program has been reauthorized in every farm bill for 40 years. The main intra-industry fight over CRP is how big it should be and which land it should target.67% of producers support expanding CRP acreswhile only 10% disagree, and demand regularly exceeds the cap. So farmers themselves largely support spending even more than the billions we currently do to convert even more farms into unused land. About 20% of US food production by value is exported. The US is the world’s largest exporter of food, we shipped$176 billion in agricultural exports in 2024. Foreign trade is good, but we’re not at the edge of some failure in country-level self sufficiency in food. 30 to 40% of the US food supply is never eaten. One estimate suggests that if all America’s wasted food were grown on one farm, the farm would be 125,000 square miles, or 89 times the size of all land owned by data center companies by 2028. This means that a 1% reduction in food waste would free up enough land for all data center building over the next 3 years if literally all of it were built on farms. This wasted farmland generates as much greenhouse gas emissions as 42 coal-fired power plants, 3% of all US emissions. If you add in the emissions from ethanol, 5% of all US emissions come from unnecessary farming. Total US farmland peaked decades ago and has fallen since. From 2000 to 2024, it shrank from945 millionto876 million acres, an loss of 108,000 square miles, about the size of Colorado. This is 77x the projected footprint of all data center land in 2028, and not many people seem to know it happened. Why did farmland shrink this much? It’s purely that yields per acre grew. American corn yields in the 1930s averaged24 bushels per acre. In 2024 they averaged180, a 7.5x increase. Total corn production is nowmore than 6 timeswhat it was in the 1930s, but uses less land than it did in the 1930s. The same is true for soy, wheat, and most major crops. The trend keeps on going. Corn yields have been rising at about1.9 bushels per acre per yearfor 70 consecutive years with no signs of stopping. If you follow this line, average corn yield in 2050 will be around 230 bushels per acre. We’ll need less land to grow the same food 25 years from now than we do today. In 1850,much of New England was farmland. Vermont was about 70% pasture and cropland. Then mechanized farming opened up the Midwest’s deeper soils, the Industrial Revolution pulled rural labor into cities, and New England farms became uneconomic. The land turned back into forests. Today,about 70–80% of New England is forested. Where I grew up in Massachusetts, you can regularly find old stone walls from farmers hidden deep in the woods. The region has more forest cover now than in 1820. Vermont went from a stripped agricultural landscape to one of the most heavily forested states in the country. Across the eastern US,hundreds of millions of acresfollowed this pattern between 1850 and 1950. The country was fine. The abandoned land was the marginal stuff barely worth farming, and the land that kept being farmed was the productive Corn Belt and Central Valley. If a few thousand acres of mediocre Loudoun County farmland end up under Amazon and Microsoft and Google data centers, I suspect that nothing bad will happen, for the same reason that it’s not a disaster that most of New England was changed from farms into forests. The marginal hay field on the exurban edge is producing way less value to anyone than a hyperscale data center on the same land. A farmer who sells to a data center company for 10x what their land is worth is doing something economically rational, environmentally reasonable, and morally fine. They’re doing exactly what their grandparents in Vermont did when they sold their farms and let the trees come back. There are too many other ways farmers’ disproportionate political power makes land use and policy goofy to keep writing about here. For more, you should look intoag-gag laws, thedecline of the Ogallala Aquifer,use-it-or-lose-it water rights, andthe “family-farmer”myth (discussed a bit above) which wealthy farming families use to garner sympathy. And on top of this, the unimaginably huge moral catastrophe ofindustrial animal agriculture. For a deep dive on the weird world of farm economics I’d recommendthis podcast series from the Agricultural Economics Institute. American farmers grow more food than the country eats, export 20% of the surplus, and we the buyers throw out another third of what’s left. Farmers collect $1.85 billion a year from the federal government to keep a Kentucky-sized 40,000 square miles of farmland intentionally idle, an area 28 times the full projected footprint of all land on American data center property in 2028 (with data centers themselves occupying just 2% of that land, just 25 square miles). The federal government forces oil refiners to buy 15 billion gallons of corn ethanol every year, occupying roughly the surface area of New York State, draining aquifers at 40 times the rate of every data center in the country combined, and producing a fuel that, once you account for land-use change and nitrous oxide, is 24% dirtier than the gasoline it replaces. The food we waste, if grown on a single farm, would cover an area 89 times the size of all land owned by data center companies by 2028, and emits as much CO2 as 42 coal plants, 3% of all US emissions. Between 2000 and 2024, farmers sold in total a Colorado-sized chunk of land all on their own, 77 times all land on data center property in 2028, and grew more food than ever on what was left. None of this caused any problems for US food access. And then, in the middle of all this, a farmer in Loudoun County sells a few acres of mediocre hay field to a hyperscaler for ten times its agricultural value, and the response is that we’re running out of farmland. The marginal Virginia hay field is worth more as a data center than as hay. The marginal Iowa cornfield going to ethanol would be much better if it were nothing at all. When a farmer in Loudoun County wants to sell to Amazon for ten times the land’s agricultural value, the correct response is to wish them well. We need way less farmland than we currently use, and it’s fine if data centers buy some. From Futurism, the same magazine that published the story on Oregon nitrate poisoning that let farmers off the hook: The immense hype surrounding AI has caused enormous data centers to crop up across the country, triggering significant opposition. It’s not just the loss of land: enormous power needs arepushing the grid into meltdownanddriving up local electricity prices, catching the attention of politicians and their irate constituents. idk I think it’s more than hype. One 86-year-old farmer in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, has heard enough. As localFoxaffiliateWPMTreports, Mervin Raudabaugh, who has farmed the surrounding land for more than 60 years, turned down more than $15 million from data center developers in a package deal that involved three neighboring property owners as well. The farmer was offered $60,000 per acre to build a data center on his property. But giving up his family legacy wasn’t in the cards for him. “I was not interested in destroying my farms,” he toldWPMT. “That was the bottom line. It really wasn’t so much the economic end of it. I just didn’t want to see these two farms destroyed.” Instead, he sold the development rights in December for just under $2 million to a conservation trust, taking a significant loss but guaranteeing that it would stay farmland in perpetuity. This guy turned down $58,000,000 to ensure that America continues to have way more farmland than we need. Users on social media called him a “legend,” andarguedhe had “more integrity than the whole government.” “Now that is a real hero in these gutless times!” another usertweeted. “$15M is huge, but clean water, quiet land, and legacy don’t have a price tag,” another userargued. Data centersdon’t really pollute water anywhere. The sheer amount of land being earmarked to construct enormous energy and water-sucking data centers is remarkable. A data center in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, is set to take up 600 acres, which could cost local residents their land, asABC Newsreportedthis week. Another octogenarian farmer, the 83-year-old Tom Uttech, who has lived on his 52-acre Wisconsin property for almost 40 years, told the broadcaster that he “couldn’t believe” that a local utility company was looking to build “power lines that are 300 or something feet tall, taller than apparently the Statue of Liberty,” through his land to power the data center. “Cost residents their land” meaning “Could mean residents are paid way more than what their land is worth if they choose to accept the deal.” 600 acres is about a square mile. Each of these is a square mile: A private company purchasing a single square mile farm in a rural area wouldn’t make headlines. But data centers are seen as weird and untraditional, so they get way more scrutiny. We would need to build 50,000 data centers at this size to use as much land as ethanol corn. “It breaks my heart to think of what’s going to take place here, because only the land that’s preserved here is going to be here,” Raudabaugh toldWPMT. “The rest of every square inch is going to get built on. The American farm family is definitely in trouble.” This is an insane hyperbolic thing to say. We have so so so much farmland, way more than we need. Every square inch is not going to get built on, and the average American farm family is incredibly well-off and coasting on powerful political allegiances and the confused goodwill of populists. This same story was reported on inFortuneandNewsweek. From the Washington Post: The town didn’t “plan” the data centers, they approved a private company to purchase land. This is a common weird framing in the data center discourse. People often talk as if data centers are a collective decision we're all making. In reality, private companies buy land, power, and water from towns and utilities like any other company. This town is 17 square miles. The article says the data centers would together take up 14% of the town’s land, so ~2.4 square miles. This is the town of Archibald PA that the article’s about: It’s in a pretty rural area: These are the sites where the data centers have been proposed: If you found out that a small town like this were getting a college or farm, how would you react? Would this be an unacceptable imposition on the locals? The college would radically change the general culture and infrastructure needs of the town, whereas the data centers hum in the background. There are definitely serious issues the locals bring up in the article (electricity costs, air pollution, noise) but the land use framing makes no sense to me. Archbald is in a pretty rural area with tons of wide open land. Purchasing 14% of a small town’s land on its own doesn’t seem newsworthy. The title image is already promising: The subtitle is “Farmers are fighting AI companies offering fortunes to build data centers on their land. Can they withstand the pressure — and live to farm another day?” Farmers are always framed as the good guys. Question this. “Life-changing money.” That’s how Wendy Reigel describes the windfall developers are offering farmers for their land, potential sites for hyperscale data centers to meet AI’s massive processing needs. Reigel is a grassroots anti-data-center activist who successfullyfought the building of a centerjust 300 feet from her house in Chesterton, Indiana; she now helps other communities mobilize against data center incursions. She can only make an educated guess as to how much money is on offer — almost everything about these facilities is shrouded in secrecy. “$20,000 an acre would be low-balling it,” Reigel said. “$40,000 would be maybe a starting point. And I’ve heard as high as $90,000.” This doesn’t exactly sound nefarious. They’re offering crazy amounts of money for people’s land. Would it be better if they offered less? And with this wind beneath their sails,AI-giddy companieslike Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle have embarked on a national land grab. The new land grab here being in total about 2 times as much land as we use to grow Christmas trees by 2030. Some farmers are loath to condemn fellow farmers who sell their land for this purpose. They don’t begrudge life-changing money to anyone who’s contended with their industry’s often brutal fiscal realities, althougha farmer in Michiganwho sold his land for an “astronomical” sum — in the interest of what he called progress — says his neighbors don’t wave at him anymore. With or without the animus, farmers who opt not to sell are left to contend with the potential destruction of their operations and their lives. “It ruins all our little farms around here that we worked all our lives on,” a couple in Coweta, Oklahoma,told the local news. I think all farmers should be loathe to condemn other people for making private financial decisions that work out well for them if they don’t harm other people. The question is will the data centers harm the nearby farmers? There aredata centers popping upalmost everywhere, from Oregon and Nevada to Georgia and Virginia. (Loudon County is our country’s “data center alley.”) But Indiana has become an especial target for hyperscale facilities, of which there are an estimated1,130globally; since Indiana produces a lot of corn, soy, and hogs, it’s also illustrative of the challenges that farmers in particular are up against. 43% of Indiana's corn crop went into ethanol production in 2024, and~95% of Indiana hogs are in factory farm conditions. Neither inspires sympathy from me. “That hurts us, because they’re paying a higher price than market value for the land; that drives property values up, then farmers are struggling to pay their taxes,” Blalock said. That price is also “completely out of reach” for any farmers starting out or looking to expand their operations. When data centers are willing to quadruple or quintuple an already-inflated price, affordability for farmers goes up in smoke. Okay, well we have one answer to how data centers are “harming” farmers. They’re making the farmers’ land so valuable that property taxes go up. For any farmer who owns the land they farm (which most do), rising land values are a massively good outcome. Land is by far the largest asset on most farms’ balance sheets (the article will go on to note this). They can borrow against it, sell and retire on it, or pass it to their kids. The article is asking us to feel sorry for farmers because someone is making their land massively more valuable. I need anyone reading this to ask: if it’s bad for the data center to raise farmer land values, doesn’t that mean it would be good for it to lower their land values? But if a data center moved in and made everyone’s farmland way less valuable, I think we’d also hear lots of negative stories about how it harmed a community, and there I’d take it more seriously. The weirdest thing about all of this is that Indiana’s agricultural land tax is not supposed to be based simply on speculative industrial value.The state says agricultural land value is based on productive capacity, regardless of the land’s potential or highest and best use, and the 2026 agricultural base rate is listed at $2,120 per acre. So I’m not sure if rising land value will even raise taxes here. Morgan Butler is a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center,who helpedthe tobacco- and dairy-producing community of Pittsylvania County, Virginia, fight off a 1,000-acre AI facility. He said developers are drawn to farmland because “They see a huge area. In their eyes there’s nothing on it, nothing particularly valuable, there aren’t that many residents so hopefully they won’t kick up a firestorm of public opposition.” What needs opposing here? A data center drops in and offers so much money that it inadvertently makes all the land value around it go way up and all the farmers who didn’t interact with it got richer? What? That rural “nothingness,” though, is precisely what community members opposed to data centers hope to preserve. One farmer in Kentuckyturned down an $8 million offerfor his land, citing his family’s sentimental ties to it and the community’s fondness for the landscape as it is. However, one bitter truth for farmers is that much of theirnet worth can be tied up in their land; retirement might necessitate selling property because they have few or no other assets, making a generous offer for acreage hard to refuse. Okay, so far this article’s been implying that it’s a massive crime that the data centers are raising farmer land values so much, and now it adds that much of an average farmer’s net worth is tied up in their land. This implies that the data centers are doing farmers a massive favor by increasing so much of their total net worth? But the article never acknowledges this contradiction. In fact, a pull quote appears right below that makes this contrast more obvious: A hyperscale data center can use upwards of8 million gallonsof water per year, mostly for cooling its servers. “We don’t have the water supply” to meet those needs, said farmer Bart Snyder. Snyder lives in Wolcott, an ag-centric town 135 miles northwest of Henry County, where Amazon is scouting a 330-acre facility 1,000 feet from one of his farm properties. He’s suing his town’s commissioner and redevelopment committee members (all of whom signed NDAs) for approving a farm-to-industrial land rezoning on behalf of that facility. “To consume that much water would absolutely devastate our row crops” and potentially create a deficit for Snyder’s 30 beef calves, which each drink 15 gallons of water daily. “People are literally scared to death,” he said. Blalock is concerned that if a data center is approved in her county, it could deplete the local aquifer, causing neighbors’ wells to run dry and preventing her family from ever drilling one of their own for their cattle. She said that would put them out of business and leave their land valueless. “No one has answers for us about, what’s our backup plan? What if people lose water? You can take your family to go stay in a hotel but it’s not like doggy daycare; you can’t show up with 50 head of cattle.” And she worries: “Are we going to be the generation that loses the farm?” The data center seems unlikely to do this. Wolcott is in White County, Indiana. Irrigation on corntypically runs 6–10 inches per season. 8,695 irrigated acres at ~8 inches of supplemental irrigation consume roughly 1.9 billion gallons per year. The 8 million-gallon data center is 0.4% of that. This data center is using as much water as a local 35 acre irrigated farm. If one additional 35 acre farm appeared, I don’t think the farmers would be talking this way. The rest of the article has legit worries about pollution and electricity prices. It also has an interesting concern about infrasound I hadn’t addressed last time: its effect on animals. I think that if animals can detect infrasound because they evolved to hear different frequencies than us, it makes complete sense that infrasound could be harmful to them. I will circle back on this once I know more about infrasound and animals. This is a back-of-envelope estimate. Nobody tracks total US data center parcel acreage directly. As of late 2025, Cushman & Wakefield reportsthe Americas hosts 43.4 GW of operational data center capacity, with 93.6% in the US(so ~40 GW US operational), plus 25.3 GW under construction. Capacity forecasts for 2030 cluster around a 2.5–3.5× expansion:McKinsey projects US data center power demand to rise from 25 GW in 2024 to over 80 GW by 2030,S&P Global’s 451 Research projects 134 GW by 2030, andBain forecasts global capacity reaching 163 GW(the US is roughly 80% of the Americas total).Skeptics including Grid Strategies argue these are inflated by speculative projects and that ~65 GW of additional load is more realistic. Assuming a central case of ~85 GW US operational by 2030.Cushman & Wakefield’s 2025 Data Center Development Cost Guide reports the average data center parcel acquired in 2024 was 224 acres — a 144% increase since 2022, with hyperscalers routinely buying 1,000+ acre sites for phased buildout (Meta’s4-million-square-foot Louisiana campussits on 2,250 acres for ~2 GW). Combining current operational acreage (~300,000 acres across roughly 4,000 facilities, most of which are small legacy colocation on tiny urban parcels) with new hyperscale buildout at ~1,500–3,000 acres per new GW gives a total in the 600,000–1,000,000 acre range, roughly 1,400 square miles at the central estimate, or about the area of Rhode Island. Building-footprint math: existing US data center floor space is roughly 300–400 million sq ft, or ~11–14 sq mi. By 2030, capacity is projected to roughly triple (from ~25 GW today to ~85 GW central case), but power density is rising sharply at the same time — AI racks now run 40–60 kW vs. legacy racks at 10–14 kW, so new facilities pack much more compute into the same square footage. Assuming new-build density runs 1.5–2× legacy stock, ~85 GW × ~7,000–9,000 sq ft per MW (blended legacy + AI-dense) gives roughly 600–765 million sq ft, or ~22–27 sq mi. 25 sq mi is in the middle. Using LBNL’s empirical median energy density (447 MWh/acre fixed-tilt, 394 MWh/acre tracking), 450 TWh works out to ~1.0–1.15 million acres or ~1,575–1,800 sq mi. See Bolinger & Bolinger 2022,“Land Requirements for Utility-Scale PV. USGS SPARROW modelingattributes 52% of nitrogen delivered to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi/Atchafalaya basin, which drains~41% of the contiguous USand dominates national nitrate flux, to corn and soybean cultivation. Corn drives most of that share, since soybeans are nitrogen-fixers receiving little synthetic fertilizer, and corn alone receivesover 40% of all commercial fertilizer applied in the US.Ethanol uses ~40% of the US corn crop. Multiplying through (40% of corn × ~40–45% of US water nitrate attributable to corn) gives ~16–18%, rounded to one-fifth. This is a gross attribution;netting out distillers grains coproductsthat return as animal feed would bring it closer to ~12–14%, andLark et al. (2022)frame the RFS-attributablemarginaleffect (vs. a no-RFS counterfactual) as smaller still. Ethanol corn occupies ~30 million acres (USDA ERS; about 1.5% of contiguous US land perBloomberg US Land Use). Utility-scale solar in the US generates ~370–470 MWh per acre per year (LBNL 2021 PV Land Requirements, Figure 8 median energy density). 30 million acres × ~400 MWh/acre/yr ≈ 12,000 TWh/yr, rounded to ~11,000 TWh. US electricity generation in 2024 was ~4,200 TWh (EIA Monthly Energy Review), so 11,000 TWh ≈ 2.6x. Global generation is ~30,000 TWh (Ember Yearly Electricity Data), so 11,000 TWh ≈ 37%. US corn averaged186.5 bushels per harvested acre in 2025(USDA NASS), and modern dry-mill plants yield roughly2.88 gallons of undenatured ethanol per bushel(EIA Monthly Energy Review, citing Argonne’s GREET model), giving ~537 gallons of ethanol per acre. At ethanol’s gross heat content of3.539 million BTU/barrel, or ~84,000 BTU/gal(EIA), that works out to roughly13,000 kWh/acre/yearof gross chemical energy. Net of fossil-fuel inputs the number is far smaller: USDA’s most favorable accounting puts theenergy return on investment at about 1.3, whileindependent estimates put it closer to 1.0(Murphy et al., 2011), implying net energy on the order of 1,000–3,000 kWh/acre/year. A US utility-scale solar PV plant delivers a median447 MWh per acre per year for fixed-tilt and 394 MWh for single-axis tracking(Berkeley Lab analysis of 736 plants built 2007–2019), or roughly400,000–450,000 kWh/acre/year, with newer plants denser than the median. Comparing gross ethanol energy to solar, that’s ~30–35× more energy per acre from solar; comparing solar to ethanol’snetenergy, it’s well over 100×. Even crediting corn ethanol generously for its DDGS animal-feed coproduct (~30%) doesn’t move the gross-energy ratio below ~25×. For the global northward shift of agricultural climate zones, see King et al. 2018,“Northward shift of the agricultural climate zone under 21st-century global climate change,”Nature Scientific Reports (boreal regions reaching crop-feasible growing-degree-days for the first time, with the leading edge shifting up to ~1,200 km north by 2099). For US-specific crop mix projections, see Cho & McCarl 2017,“Climate change influences on crop mix shifts in the United States,”Nature Scientific Reports. See e.g. Burchfield 2022,“Shifting cultivation geographies in the Central and Eastern US,”Environmental Research Letters, the most cited recent paper for the Corn Belt-collapse claim. Burchfield herself notes that “these projections may be pessimistic because they don’t account for all of the ways that technology may help farmers adapt.”
Trentanove milioni di visualizzazioni per un video fatto quasi per scherzo. È da lì che comincia, in un certo senso, la storia di Matilde Bonugli. Prima c’era già tutto: la timidezza da bambina, le imitazioni dei professori fatte solo davanti alle amiche, il …
Matilde Bonugli: «La comedy sulla quotidianità funziona perché le persone si rivedono in quello che racconto»
Trentanove milioni di visualizzazioni per un video fatto quasi per scherzo. È da lì che comincia, in un certo senso, la storia di Matilde Bonugli. Prima c’era già tutto: la timidezza da bambina, le imitazioni dei professori fatte solo davanti alle amiche, il gusto per l’ironia tenuto in un cassetto finché i social non hanno spalancato la porta.
Oggi Matilde è una delle creator italiane più riconoscibili nel formato coppia, con un linguaggio che funziona perché non sembra costruito — anche quando lo è. Parla di convivenza, di quotidianità, di quelle piccole frizioni che chi vive con qualcun altro conosce a memoria. E il pubblico, puntualmente, si riconosce.
Come nasce il tuo format? C’è stato un momento preciso in cui hai capito che la comedy sulla quotidianità era la tua strada, o è successo per gradi?
Il nostro format è nato circa tre anni fa. All’inizio facevo video ironici da sola, Luca ancora non compariva nei contenuti. Mi è sempre piaciuto creare video divertenti e giocare sull’ironia. Poi, quasi per scherzo, abbiamo iniziato a fare qualche video insieme e uno di questi ha raggiunto 39 milioni di visualizzazioni. Lì abbiamo capito che i contenuti di coppia potevano davvero essere la nostra strada e abbiamo iniziato a sviluppare sempre di più questo format. In realtà credo che questa parte di me ci sia sempre stata. Nonostante da piccola fossi molto timida, cercavo sempre di tirare fuori il lato ironico con le mie amiche: facevo imitazioni dei professori, parodie, piccoli video divertenti… però sempre in contesti molto “protetti”, solo con persone con cui mi sentivo a mio agio. Oggi penso che la comedy sulla quotidianità funzioni perché nasce da situazioni vere e vissute. Molte scene prendono ispirazione da cose che succedono davvero nella vita di tutti i giorni e probabilmente le persone si rivedono in questo.
Il tuo format oggi funziona benissimo in verticale, su Reels e TikTok. Hai mai pensato a qualcosa di più lungo — una serie, un podcast, un progetto che abbia una narrativa che va oltre il singolo video?
Sì assolutamente, infatti su YouTube porto già contenuti più lunghi, soprattutto vlog dei nostri viaggi, dove riesco a raccontare molto di più rispetto al singolo reel o TikTok. Mi piacerebbe tantissimo anche fare un podcast in futuro, perché penso che ci permetterebbe di raccontarci in modo ancora più naturale, magari parlando di vita quotidiana, convivenza, lavoro sui social e tutte quelle situazioni ironiche che viviamo ogni giorno.
C’è una versione futura di Matilde Bonugli creator che oggi ancora non esiste ma che stai costruendo — magari un prodotto, un brand, qualcosa che sia tuo al di là delle piattaforme?
Credo di sì. Oggi le persone mi conoscono soprattutto per le scenette ironiche e i video di coppia, però mi piacerebbe far conoscere sempre di più anche Matilde come persona, portando sui social più passioni, momenti quotidiani e lati magari più spontanei e personali. Per quanto riguarda qualcosa di “mio” al di là delle piattaforme, abbiamo qualche progetto e idea in mente, anche legati a un possibile prodotto o brand, ma al momento non c’è ancora nulla di concreto. Sicuramente però è una direzione a cui pensiamo e su cui ci piacerebbe lavorare molto presto.
L’intelligenza artificiale sta entrando nella produzione di contenuti a tutti i livelli. Tu la usi già in qualche modo, o la tieni fuori deliberatamente? E ti spaventa o ti incuriosisce quello che potrebbe fare al tuo settore nei prossimi anni?
La utilizzo, anche se non in modo eccessivo. Mi capita di usarla come supporto creativo o organizzativo. Allo stesso tempo però è una cosa che mi incuriosisce tantissimo ma che mi spaventa anche molto. Penso soprattutto al fatto che oggi, con l’intelligenza artificiale, la tua faccia e la tua voce possano essere messe praticamente ovunque, rendendo tutto estremamente reale. È impressionante vedere quanto si stia evolvendo velocemente, ma credo faccia anche un po’ paura, soprattutto nel nostro settore dove l’immagine e l’autenticità sono così importanti.
Hai mai collaborato con altri creator in modo strutturato, non solo come ospite in un video? Come scegli le persone con cui lavorare — c’è una compatibilità di valori, di stile, di pubblico che cerchi?
Abbiamo collaborato con altre coppie di creator, ma per ora principalmente per realizzare video in collaborazione insieme. Di solito scegliamo persone che portano contenuti sulla vita di coppia simili ai nostri, così da riuscire a integrare bene il format e creare qualcosa che sembri naturale per entrambi i pubblici. Per noi è importante soprattutto avere uno stile e un modo di comunicare compatibili, perché nei contenuti di coppia si percepisce subito quando c’è sintonia reale anche davanti alla telecamera.
La community dei creator italiani è un ecosistema reale in cui ci si supporta, o è più competitivo di quanto sembri dall’esterno?
Non ho ancora avuto modo di conoscere tantissimi creator dal vivo, però quei pochi che ho conosciuto sono stati incontri molto belli e reali. Mi piace confrontarmi con persone che fanno il mio stesso lavoro, anche perché spesso viviamo situazioni simili che magari chi è fuori da questo mondo non capisce fino in fondo. Per quanto mi riguarda non vivo questo ambiente come una competizione. Anzi, penso sia bello potersi supportare e confrontare, soprattutto in un lavoro che cambia continuamente e che a volte può essere anche molto stressante.
Hai un team, una figura che ti gestisce, o fai ancora tutto da sola — dalla produzione alla negoziazione dei contratti?
Ho un manager che mi aiuta nella gestione lavorativa, soprattutto per quanto riguarda collaborazioni, contratti e organizzazione, quindi non faccio proprio tutto da sola. Al momento però non faccio parte di un’agenzia.
Quando arriva una proposta di collaborazione commerciale, chi valuta se fa al caso tuo? Hai un criterio preciso per dire no, o è ancora una decisione molto istintiva?
Di solito io e il mio manager ci confrontiamo sempre quando arriva una proposta, quindi è una decisione condivisa. Ci sono però alcune categorie con cui preferisco non lavorare, ad esempio giochi online, gioco d’azzardo o cose dove bisogna investire soldi. Questo perché non mi piace mettere la faccia su qualcosa di cui non sono davvero sicura al 100% o che magari potrebbe creare aspettative non reali nelle persone. Preferisco consigliare solo cose che sento autentiche e che userei davvero anch’io.
La parte burocratica e fiscale del fare la creator in Italia — partita IVA, contratti, fatturazione — è un peso che senti? E come la gestisci concretamente?
Sì, ho la partita IVA e tutta la parte burocratica e fiscale va comunque gestita con attenzione. È una parte del lavoro meno “visibile”, ma molto importante. Sicuramente a volte può pesare, soprattutto perché questo lavoro non ha uno stipendio fisso: ci sono mesi con tante collaborazioni e altri magari più tranquilli, quindi c’è sempre un po’ di incertezza.
Come cambia il tuo lavoro quando c’è di mezzo una collaborazione commerciale? Riesci a mantenere il tuo tono, o senti una pressione a essere diversa?
Dipende molto dal brand e da quello che cerca nella collaborazione. Ci sono aziende che si fidano del creator e ti lasciano comunicare il prodotto nel tuo modo naturale, e lì secondo me vengono fuori i contenuti migliori, perché riesci davvero a mantenere il tuo tono e la tua spontaneità. Altre volte invece ci sono richieste più rigide o la volontà di esaltare il prodotto in modo molto forzato, e lì magari mi sento un pochino più frenata. Penso che oggi il pubblico capisca subito quando qualcosa è autentico e quando invece sembra una “marchetta” troppo costruita, quindi personalmente lavoro meglio con i brand che lasciano libertà creativa e che si fidano davvero del creator.
Tra cinque anni dove si trova Matilde Bonugli?
Questa forse è la domanda più difficile, perché il futuro molto spesso mi fa anche un po’ paura, soprattutto nel periodo storico in cui viviamo oggi, dove cambia tutto così velocemente. Spero comunque di continuare a fare questo lavoro, magari crescendo ancora di più, portando avanti progetti più grandi e aver già realizzato qualcosa di mio, dopo aver partecipato ad un gioco televisivo quest’inverno, ho capito che entrare nel mondo dello spettacolo anche quello piacerebbe molto chissà. E tra cinque anni mi piacerebbe anche avere una famiglia mia. La cosa che posso dire è che, se ripenso alla Matilde di cinque anni fa, non avrebbe mai immaginato di essere dove si trova oggi. Quindi forse ho imparato che a volte il futuro riesce anche a sorprenderti in modi belli.
«La Matilde di cinque anni fa non avrebbe mai immaginato di essere dove si trova oggi». Non è retorica da intervista. È la sintesi onesta di un percorso che non aveva un piano preciso, solo una propensione naturale a far ridere le persone e la fortuna — o il coraggio — di non smettere di provarci.
In this review, I'll report my experience with the Khadas Mind xPlay display and keyboard using the Mind and Mind 2 mini PCs, as well as a CHUWI CoreBook Air Plus 16 laptop to test it as a standard external display. Using Mind xPlay with the Mind 2 mini PC I …
Por Redacción PortalPortuario @PortalPortuario La Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) invitó a las partes interesadas a presentar ofertas en respuesta La entrada Sudáfrica: TNPA solicita propuestas para operar terminal de granel líquido en Puerto de Ciudad del Cabo se publicó primero en PortalPortuario .
Por Redacción PortalPortuario @PortalPortuario TUI Cruises está ampliando su presencia en Hamburgo, lo que demuestra la importancia de la ubicación La entrada TUI Cruises amplía significativamente presencia en Puerto de Hamburgo se publicó primero en PortalPortuario .
La capacidad innovadora de las compañías españolas sigue cotizando al alza. La inteligencia artificial protagoniza un buen puñado de iniciativas premiadas, seguida de otras tecnologías digitales, la sostenibilidad, la RSC empresarial, la formación y el empleo…
ALIMENTACIÓN Y BEBIDAS
1. Un búnker para preservar el olivar. Consejo Oleícola Internacional
El olivo ha sido el primer cultivo leñoso que accede al Banco Mundial de Semillas de Svalbard, en Noruega. Bajo el liderazgo de este organismo, se han depositado cerca de 700 variedades de 21 países para blindar su genética ante el cambio climático y las plagas, garantizando la producción de aceite.
2. Nutrición saludable y lista para tomar. Danone
Lograr una nutrición completa en formato bebible ya es una realidad. Con Alpro Meal to Go, el gigante de la alimentación ofrece una fórmula con 20 gramos de proteína y sin edulcorantes, diseñada para el consumo nómada. Esta propuesta vegetal y equilibrada es ideal para quienes buscan calidad y rapidez, pero sin renunciar a una alimentación saludable.
3. Proteína verde en lonchas. Better Balance
Esta marca demuestra que el embutido vegano puede ser saludable. Sus lonchas de espinacas con albahaca y tomate con orégano destacan por un aporte proteico inédito de hasta 28 gramos y un perfil bajo en grasas saturadas. Con el sello Sabor del Año 2026, reafirma que es posible combinar ingredientes 100% naturales y formatos prácticos sin perder por ello un alto rendimiento.
4. El relevo sano de las bebidas isotónicas. The Coca-Cola Company
La hidratación avanzada de Bodyarmor Lyte ha aterrizado en España. Su fórmula técnica, rica en vitaminas y electrolitos, elimina las calorías de las isotónicas tradicionales. Esta apuesta funcional de la compañía americana se orienta al bienestar y al rendimiento diario, respondiendo con precisión a los nuevos estilos de vida activos.
5. Vinos seleccionados por la neurociencia. Vintria Global
Esta startup transforma la hostelería con un sumiller digital basado en la neurociencia. Su sistema WineMind descifra el perfil emocional del usuario vía QR para sugerir la botella ideal entre más de 5.000 referencias estructuradas. Esta solución reduce el estrés ante la carta y posiciona cada vino en función del estado de ánimo exacto de los clientes.
DIGITALIZACIÓN
6 . El primer aspirador que escala peldaños. Dreame
Superar peldaños ya no es imposible para la robótica de consumo. El sistema Cyber X rompe esta limitación histórica con una arquitectura biónica de patas y orugas capaz de subir hasta 25 centímetros. Este avance permite limpiar viviendas de varias plantas de forma autónoma y sin necesidad de cargar el dispositivo de manera manual.
7. Cirugía láser para la salud de los túneles. Euroconsult Nuevas Tecnologías
Digitalizar la seguridad de los túneles ya es posible gracias a un innovador vehículo español. Equipado con cámaras láser 3D, el sistema Tunnelins 360 mide desgastes de 0,1 milímetros a 40 kilómetros por hora. Al ganar 10 veces más velocidad que el método tradicional, garantiza una puesta a punto sin largos cortes de vía.
8. Arte colgado por algoritmos. GEA Consultoría
ARTia es una plataforma que permite a galerías y artistas crear catálogos digitales para que sus clientes visualicen obras con absoluto realismo. A través de un código QR, el comprador cuelga virtualmente la pieza en su casa para asegurar el encaje estético. Es una apuesta que conecta el estudio del artista con el salón del comprador.
9. Inteligencia artificial antivandalismo. Innova-TSN
Ha creado para Renfe un modelo capaz de prever ataques de grafiti con 12 horas de antelación. El sistema analiza 300 variables, como el clima o eventos locales, e identifica patrones de vandalismo invisibles a los métodos tradicionales. Gracias a esta inteligencia artificial, los equipos de seguridad se desplazan a zonas de riesgo antes del daño, reduciendo tanto costes de limpieza como el uso de productos químicos en los talleres.
10. Oído digital para el negocio. Inconcert
Esta tecnológica española utiliza inteligencia artificial generativa para descifrar llamadas en tiempo real. Su sistema Inspeech interpreta sentimientos y detecta necesidades en más de 20 idiomas, permitiendo activar acciones personalizadas o atención virtual inmediata en distintos canales. Se trata de una solución clave para ganar eficiencia y transformar cada conversación en una venta.
11. Licitaciones de alta precisión. Iberdrola
La selección de empresas en Iberdrola ya no es manual. Su inteligencia artificial analiza 100.000 ofertas técnicas anuales para extraer datos clave en grandes obras. El sistema agiliza la comparativa final de las propuestas competidoras, garantizando que cada compra responde con precisión a las necesidades de la firma.
12. Rumbo a la luna con vigilancia española. Integrasys
El regreso al entorno lunar tuvo acento castellano el mes pasado. En la misión Artemis II, la española Integrasys diseñó Mission Track, la plataforma para el seguimiento en tiempo real de la nave Orión y la monitorización de sus comunicaciones. El sistema analizó la telemetría y el efecto Doppler para determinar su posición y trayectoria en espacio profundo, aportando a la NASA una visión operativa clave y mucho más automatizada en esta compleja misión tripulada.
13. Un nuevo asesor digital de compras. Jaggaer
JAI es el primer asistente inteligente para optimizar las compras empresariales. Este copiloto digital ayuda a los equipos profesionales a gestionar la cadena de suministro, desde evaluar proveedores hasta detectar errores en pedidos. Gracias al uso de inteligencia artificial generativa, automatiza flujos complejos para que los responsables puedan centrarse en decisiones estratégicas de alto nivel.
14. Chatear con los datos de inventario. Kaira
Optimizar la logística es posible gracias a esta startup y su inteligencia artificial generativa. La herramienta permite consultar el estado de pedidos e inventarios mediante lenguaje natural por WhatsApp o Microsoft Teams. Al centralizar los datos de transporte y producción, el sistema ofrece respuestas inmediatas para anticipar riesgos. De esta manera, el acceso a la información se vuelve directo y estratégico para cualquier profesional de una determinada organización.
15. Más eficiencia en los cultivos. John Deere
El tratamiento de viñedos y frutales da un nuevo paso hacia la automatización gracias al sistema GUSS. Esta solución, desarrollada por el fabricante de maquinaria agrícola, utiliza un total de nueve sensores para detectar las malas hierbas y aplicar herbicidas de forma selectiva. Al eliminar la necesidad de un operario en cabina, se reduce la exposición humana a los productos químicos. Este ecosistema digital mejora la rentabilidad y la sostenibilidad operativa en las grandes explotaciones.
16. Industria conectada, pero sin conexión. Legálitas
Democratizar el acceso al conocimiento jurídico es el objetivo de Álex, el asistente de inteligencia artificial especializado en derecho español de esta reconocida legaltech. Con el respaldo de 800 abogados y una base de más de cinco millones de casos reales, la herramienta garantiza respuestas fiables y rigurosas sobre temas laborales, de vivienda o de consumo. Esta solución móvil ya resuelve 15.000 consultas diarias, ofreciendo asesoramiento inmediato y comprensible para cualquier ciudadano. Al trasladar la experiencia legal acumulada a un entorno digital accesible, redefine la relación entre la abogacía y la sociedad en la actual era digital.
17. Decisiones clínicas más seguras y ágiles. Novo Nordisk Pharma
Facilitar la toma de decisiones clínicas es la prioridad de HemoBot, el asistente virtual especializado en hemostasia y trombosis de esta farmacéutica. Basado en evidencia científica y avalado por la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH), el sistema ofrece respuestas inmediatas y trazables para el diagnóstico y tratamiento. Su interfaz de lenguaje natural permite a especialistas y residentes acceder a contenidos validados las 24 horas del día. La herramienta digitaliza el conocimiento para una práctica médica más segura y eficiente.
18. Protección frente a futuros ataques. Palo Alto Networks
La computación cuántica pone en riesgo la criptografía que hoy protege nuestras transacciones y datos sensibles. Ante esa amenaza, esta compañía de ciberseguridad ha desarrollado una solución que ayuda a las empresas a identificar sus puntos vulnerables y migrar a sistemas seguros. El proceso se ejecuta en cuatro etapas: detectar el riesgo, evaluarlo, corregirlo y mantener una vigilancia constante. Es una hoja de ruta práctica para blindar la información antes de que lleguen los nuevos ataques.
19. Soberanía espacial para proteger las 'islas afortunadas'. Telespazio Ibérica
¿Es posible vigilar Canarias desde el espacio sin depender de terceros? La Constelación Islas Canarias (CIC) es el primer y más grande sistema de satélites para la observación de la Tierra desarrollado por una comunidad autónoma. Este proyecto, impulsado por el Cabildo de Tenerife y el Instituto Astrofísico de Canarias, integra la cámara Drago-3, capaz de ver a través del humo de incendios y detectar el estrés hídrico en los cultivos. Al procesar datos con inteligencia artificial directamente en órbita, el archipiélago logra autonomía tecnológica para gestionar de forma totalmente soberana sus crisis medioambientales y científicas con soberanía.
20. El primer teléfono que también es libro. TCL Electronics Holdings Limited
Un equilibrio perfecto entre lectura, trabajo y ocio define a este nuevo smartphone. El dispositivo Nxtpaper 70 Pro incorpora una tecnología de pantalla disruptiva que ofrece una experiencia similar al papel, protegiendo la vista durante un uso prolongado. La integración de inteligencia artificial avanzada facilita funciones de transcripción y productividad, logrando que el terminal se alinee con hábitos digitales más saludables y humanos, centrados en mejorar la calidad de vida de los usuarios.
21. Entorno inmersivo para la seguridad del futuro. Securitas Seguridad España
Esta compañía de seguridad ha evolucionado su proyecto Universe a la versión 2.0, consolidando un espacio inmersivo pionero en España. Mediante el uso de inteligencia artificial y realidad virtual, la iniciativa transforma una superficie física de 150 metros cuadrados en miles de metros cuadrados de instalaciones virtuales, permitiendo a los clientes explorar nuevos modelos de protección. Con una inversión superior a los dos millones de euros, la plataforma ya ha sido visitada por más de 250 empresas, incluidas grandes corporaciones globales y del Ibex.
22. Agua caliente inmediata y barata. Qente
Este revolucionario sistema eléctrico calienta el agua en menos de cuatro segundos sin necesidad de calderas ni termos. Su tecnología emplea calentadores de circuito impreso y una batería de alta velocidad que ahorra un 45% de energía y un 35% de agua. Gracias a su software de gestión, el usuario puede controlar el consumo en tiempo real desde cualquier dispositivo. Al eliminar el almacenamiento de agua, previene la legionela y simplifica el mantenimiento en los hogares y los hoteles.
23. Una nube pública soberana en Europa. T-Systems
Establecer un entorno de gestión de datos bajo normativa europea es la base de T Cloud Public, la plataforma diseñada por T-Systems para reducir la dependencia de proveedores tecnológicos externos. El sistema integra servicios de computación de alto rendimiento y acceso a GPU para procesos de inteligencia artificial, manteniendo siempre el control jurídico y técnico en el territorio. Al cumplir con estándares como C5 y BSI, permite a las organizaciones operar cargas críticas con máxima seguridad y portabilidad de datos.
24. Una futurista fábrica inteligente. Tecnalia
¿Puede una planta de producción aprender de su propia experiencia y adelantarse a problemas que todavía no han aparecido? La iniciativa The Proactive Factory utiliza el sistema Omnia (inteligencia artificial distribuida) para coordinar personas, robots y máquinas en tiempo real. Se trata de un ecosistema que permite maximizar la productividad hasta un 25% y reducir los costes operativos en un 15%. Al dejar de ser reactiva, la fábrica libera al talento humano de tareas rutinarias para que se centre en decisiones de alto valor estratégico.
25. Educación para cada necesidad cognitiva. Vidext
Esta compañía ha unido sus fuerzas con las de Cocemfe, una ONG, para revolucionar la formación de más de 2,6 millones de personas con discapacidad. Mediante la herramienta Vidext Visual, los materiales educativos se convierten en vídeos profesionales que utilizan avatares personalizados (como una persona en silla de ruedas), para fomentar la autorrepresentación y la cercanía. El sistema garantiza la accesibilidad total gracias a un subtitulado automático editable, así como traducciones multilingües y una estética de alto contraste y con tipografías legibles. Además, la tecnología permite ajustar el ritmo de los contenidos para adaptarlos a personas con dificultades cognitivas. Esta iniciativa no sólo digitaliza recursos, sino que también crea un entorno de aprendizaje inclusivo, humano y tecnológico.
26. Privacidad empresarial sin riesgos. Zoho
Zia LLM es el modelo de lenguaje que esta compañía tecnológica ha diseñado exclusivamente para el entorno corporativo. A diferencia de otros sistemas, no se entrena con datos de clientes ni retiene información sensible, eliminando así el riesgo de filtraciones. Al operar desde centros de datos situados en Europa, garantiza soberanía tecnológica y seguridad jurídica. Integrado en más de 55 aplicaciones, optimiza tareas como extraer datos o hacer resúmenes sin exponer información estratégica.
FINANZAS Y SEGUROS
27. Microseguros accesibles. Mapfre
La aseguradora ha fortalecido su oferta de soluciones inclusivas con microseguros accesibles. Se trata de productos sencillos, con coberturas limitadas pero suficientes en caso de enfermedad, accidente laboral, muerte de un familiar y protección para el hogar y el pequeño comercio. Es una nueva gama pensada para las necesidades reales de los microemprendedores, la mayoría mujeres de bajos ingresos. Busca aumentar la accesibilidad al seguro, la educación financiera, la cultura aseguradora y el volumen de primas de productos que cumplen con los criterios ESG.
28. Presión arterial y pulso bajo control. DKV Seguros
Lifeligth es la cobertura digital incluida en los seguros de salud de DKV, a través de la aplicación Quiero cuidarme más. Para personas de entre 40 y 70 años, mide la presión arterial y el pulso tras mirar durante varios segundos la cámara del móvil. Estima las constantes vitales, lo que facilita la detección precoz de la hipertensión.
29. Un seguro contra la brecha de género. Generali España
Vida Riesgo Flexible es un seguro para abordar la brecha de género en la protección financiera y en los seguros de vida riesgo. Las mujeres contratan menos y aseguran por un capital inferior, pese a su mayor esperanza de vida. Este producto se dirige a ellas, así como a solteros de entre 18 y 64 años y a los autónomos. Les ofrece una protección adaptada a sus necesidades y momentos vitales.
30. Partes digitales para siniestros. Acciparte
Acciparte es una infraestructura digital que sustituye al tradicional parte amistoso de accidentes. Permite que cualquier usuario reporte un siniestro en tiempo real mediante un escaneo QR, sin necesidad de apps. Captura la información del accidente justo cuando ocurre (datos, imágenes, geolocalización, firmas digitales y evidencias), transformando el proceso en un flujo inmediato, trazable e interoperable.
31. Wall Street, mucho más cerca. Payward
xStocks es una plataforma que acerca Wall Street a los inversores españoles y redefine el acceso a la inversión internacional. Ofrece acceso moderno, seguro y directo a los principales activos internacionales. Permite acceder a acciones y ETF estadounidenses mediante representaciones tokenizadas. No sólo simplifica la experiencia del inversor, sino que también introduce un modelo de infraestructura financiera abierta e interoperable, integrable en exchanges, wallets y aplicaciones on-chain.
32. La inteligencia artificial, al servicio del comercio.VISA
Visa Intelligent Commerce es una solución de compras impulsada por agentes de inteligencia artificial. Se trata de una infraestructura de pagos basada en API y credenciales tokenizadas que mantiene el control del usuario, protege la información financiera y proporciona una base escalable para experiencias de comercio basadas en esta tecnología. A través del programa Visa Agentic Ready, lanzado en Europa, permite que los agentes de inteligencia artificial actúen como asistentes de compra activos, capaces de buscar productos, comparar opciones y ejecutar transacciones de una forma totalmente segura y autorizada.
33. Un sistema de pagos 'todo en uno'. DOJO
Dojo Pocket es un dispositivo portátil con diseño todo en uno, que permite que el terminal integre la toma de pedidos y el procesamiento del pago. La transacción se puede hacer desde cualquier punto y los procesos de pagos siguen operativos si hay caídas en la red. Integra contactless, emisión de recibos digitales y división de cuenta entre comensales, así como funcionalidades de gestión de salas, programas de fidelización y control de horarios, entre otras.
FORMACIÓN Y EMPLEO
34. Talento para currar en los festivales. GI Group Holding
GiFest On Tour es una iniciativa de atracción de talento que traslada el proceso de conexión entre empresas y candidatos a los principales festivales de música en España. La propuesta acerca los empleos a las nuevas generaciones en los espacios donde estos perfiles se encuentran, ayudando a seguir construyendo vínculos sólidos y cercanos.
35. Divulgación del negocio inmobiliario. Urbanitae
La plataforma educativa Urbanitae Academy transforma la manera en la que los ciudadanos acceden a los conocimientos sobre inversión inmobiliaria. Resuelve, a través de cinco módulos, la ausencia de recursos formativos gratuitos y accesibles que permitan al inversor particular comprender el mercado.
36. Una aplicación para el trabajo temporal. Cwipe
Su aplicación móvil conecta a personas que necesitan ayuda puntual con quienes buscan trabajos temporales sin compromiso. A través de una experiencia de uso muy simple (aceptar o rechazar), se pueden encontrar o publicar trabajos en eventos, turnos en hostelería o mudanzas, eliminando procesos largos y dependientes de contactos personales. Su meta es transformar un mercado informal y desorganizado en una solución accesible, rápida y eficiente para cualquier persona.
37. Entornos laborales más diversos. REDI-LGTBI
La Red Empresarial por la Diversidad e Inclusión LGTBI (REDI) ha lanzado un programa de capacitación en diversidad para acompañar a organizaciones y profesionales en la construcción de entornos laborales seguros, inclusivos y alineados con la Ley 4/2023. La iniciativa tiene un impacto real, medible y sostenido. Más de 600 profesionales ya se han formado así y existe una lista de más de 150 empresas participantes.
38. Una guía para unir la inteligencia humana con la artificial. The Adecco Group
IA con Talento es un programa impulsado por Grupo Adecco en España que acompaña a las organizaciones en la adopción de la inteligencia artificial. El programa responde al reto de preparar a las personas ante la rápida evolución de esta tecnología, promoviendo una cultura digital basada en el aprendizaje continuo el pensamiento crítico y la innovación. La iniciativa combina sesiones de inspiración, formación progresiva y espacios de colaboración con casos reales.
39. El pódcast de la educación laboral. Euroinnova
Fuera de CV es un pódcast de divulgación sobre orientación laboral enfocado en lo que no aparece en el currículum, pero termina determinando el rumbo profesional de las personas. Se centra en las decisiones, dudas y realidades que marcan la trayectoria laboral de la gente. El formato se construye con tres voces complementarias: un dinamizador que guía la conversación, un especialista en formación y orientación laboral y, por último, un profesional especializado en la psicología.
PUBLICIDAD Y MÁRKETING
40. Tecnología con espíritu navideño. Movistar Prosegur Alarmas
Un servicio meramente funcional como el de la seguridad, humanizado gracias a la tecnología. Esto es lo que consiguió las pasadas navidades Movistar Prosegur Alarmas con la iniciativa Vigilancia Mágica. Con una herramienta de inteligencia artificial entrenada durante tres semanas con imágenes reales de los hogares, generaron fotografías hiperrealistas de Papá Noel y los reyes Melchor, Gaspar o Baltasar en las casas de sus clientes con hijos pequeños.
41. La tradición como palanca de consumo. Grupo Rodilla
Si hay una comida del día que ha perdido relevancia a causa de los cambios en los hábitos de vida, esa ha sido la merienda. Apelando a su significado social y emocional en España, el Grupo Rodilla impulsó la creación, el 22 de octubre, del Día Mundial de la Merienda. La campaña, que buscaba recuperar un momento arraigado a la cultura y tradición nacionales y activarlo como palanca de consumo, tuvo un alcance de 6,9 millones de personas.
42. Un desafío de resistencia adhesiva. Henkel Ibérica
Loctite ha llevado la promoción de su producto estrella, el Superglue-3, a otro nivel. Con la campaña multimedia Hanging Man ha puesto a prueba la potencia de su pegamento, tanto en programas de máxima audiencia en televisión (El Hormiguero o El Desafío) como en redes sociales. El desafío, tan básico como rompedor: suspender boca abajo a creadores de contenido y otras personalidades, manteniéndolas en esta posición el mayor tiempo posible, sujetos únicamente con unas gotas del pegamento.
43. Interactividad y privacidad bancaria. BBVA
Convertir un formato tradicional en un soporte digital interactivo. Esto es lo que ha conseguido BBVA con su campaña OJOS. Se trata de una iniciativa que transforma la clásica publicidad exterior en pantallas que responden en tiempo real a la presencia de las personas. Los sensores detectan la proximidad para que después los carteles ofrezcan una respuesta personalizada que, además, pone en valor conceptos como la privacidad bancaria en los entornos urbanos
44. De estigma a símbolo de fortaleza. IMC Toys Global
Tradicionalmente, el llanto ha sido asociado con la debilidad. Desde IMC Toys buscaron transformar este estigma en un símbolo de fortaleza con su campaña La Revolución de los Llorones. A través de un movimiento en redes bajo la etiqueta #YoTambiénSoyUnLlorón, un videoclip y otros elementos promocionales, todos apoyados en el universo de sus muñecos (los bebés llorones), la marca intentó normalizar la expresión de las emociones tanto en niños como en adultos.
45. Dejar el tabaco sin perder el humor. Pfizer
Concienciar y sensibilizar evitando el tono alarmista de ciertas iniciativas sanitarias. Este fue el objetivo que se marcó Pfizer para el último Día Mundial sin Tabaco, el 31 de mayo, con la campaña Dejar de fumar no es fácil. Pero cosas más difíciles has logrado. Gracias al uso estratégico del humor, consiguió conectar con el público a nivel humano, comparando el reto de dejar de fumar con pequeñas victorias y frustraciones universales de la vida actual.
46. Historias auténticas y de valor real. Radisson Hotel Group
Los hoteles buscan medios en los que promocionarse con historias auténticas y que les aporten un valor publicitario real. Los creadores de contenido, especialmente aquellos no tan conocidos, sufren para acceder a marcas y nuevas oportunidades. En un contexto como ese, cada vez más tiene más sentido una plataforma como Creator Hub, impulsada por Radisson, que conecta ambos mundos y permite al talento emergente de las redes acceder a estancias a cambio de un contenido de calidad. Ya se han adherido a ella más de 350 hoteles y una cifra superior a los 200 creadores de contenido.
47. La revolución de la publicidad en redes. TikTok España
La inteligencia artificial está transformando la publicidad en redes sociales y TikTok es una de las plataformas que mejor lo está aprovechando. Gracias a su herramienta TikTok Symphony, las marcas pueden sacar más partido a sus contenidos gracias a sus tres nuevas funcionalidades: transformar imágenes estáticas en clips cortos de cinco segundos, convertir descripciones de texto sencillas en vídeos completos, e integrar productos en otras piezas, con avatares digitales que los sostienen o se visten con ellos. Esto permite democratizar el uso de la inteligencia artificial y potenciar la creatividad.
48. Un siglo al ritmo del flamenco. LLYC
La cerveza Alhambra ha querido celebrar su centenario con un homenaje a Granada y el estilo musical sin el que no se podría entender la historia de la ciudad: el flamenco. Para ello, artistas de la talla de Kiki Morente, Carmen Linares o Diego del Morao, a las órdenes del productor y compositor Javier Limón, crearon un nuevo palo flamenco: Sosegá. Un estilo con una estructura abierta que, a diferencia del resto de palos, no tiene un remate, es decir, un cierre de compás de mayor intensidad. Al igual que hace la marca con la elaboración de sus productos, invita al consumidor a profesar la filosofía de vivir sin prisa.
PYMES Y 'STARTUPS'
49. Más protección en incendios caseros. Bayssys Technology
DTM Detector Madrid y Círculo de la Prevención han creado DTM, una solución para protegerse en incendios residenciales. Este sistema de seguridad doméstica combina la tecnología patentada por DTM con la metodología de Círculo de la Prevención. La propuesta complementa la detección en el techo con una sensorización en los dinteles de las puertas, zonas a través de las que los gases calientes suelen propagarse entre las estancias y hacia las vías de evacuación. El sistema activa un protocolo de ocho fases que traduce la complejidad del incendio en decisiones más sencillas, algo clave dado el estrés de ese momento.
50. Biberones limpios fuera de casa. Cybele Star
Empresa fundada por una madre emprendedora a raíz de la necesidad que detectó durante la crianza de su bebé: simplificar el cuidado y disfrutar sin que la logística fuera un impedimento o una preocupación. La iniciativa ha lanzado dos soluciones portátiles: un calientabiberones y un esterilizador. El primero pesa lo mismo que una naranja, permite calentar el biberón en tres minutos y, gracias a su batería, se puede usar hasta una decena de veces. El esterilizador, por su parte, también se carga con USB y se puede conectar al portátil o a cualquier puerto de este tipo. Así, sin necesidad de enchufes, el artilugio elimina con luz ultravioleta en sólo un minuto el 99,9% de los gérmenes y las bacterias, que desinfecta sin agua, químicos ni complicaciones. El esterilizador pesa 128 gramos, cabe en cualquier bolso y tiene hasta 120 usos por carga.
51. Conexiones entre emprendedores. Agencia Digital de Andalucía
El proyecto Misión Andalucía, promovido por la Agencia Digital de Andalucía (ADA), es una infraestructura digital que facilita el acceso a la financiación de las startups, alineando inversión pública y privada en una herramienta que busca un cambio en el modelo de intervención en el emprendimiento digital y sitúa el foco en el impacto real de los proyectos.
52. Aceleradora de proyectos de salud. AstraZeneca España
La farmacéutica ha lanzado la aceleradora de proyectos disruptivos Acción en colaboración con Wayra, el hub de innovación abierta de Telefónica, y Kunsen, aceleradora de startups de salud digital. Es una aceleradora de proyectos sanitarios y busca transformar la atención con el uso de tecnologías avanzadas. Se centra en cuatro áreas: oncología, cardiovascular-renal-metabólica, respiratorio, e inmunología y sistema sanitario.
53. Una factura de la luz más barata. Camby
Esta startup española ha desarrollado una nueva forma de gestionar el ahorro energético en hogares y pymes a través de una plataforma propia. Gracias a ella, se puede analizar el consumo de cada usuario para que contrate las mejores ofertas para pagar el precio de la luz más bajo. Todo ello, sin llamadas, papeleo ni coste para el usuario y actuando como intermediario entre más de 30 comercializadoras.
54. Tatuajes solares temporales. Tantoo Project
Esta compañía ha creado la iniciativa Tatoo Experience. Se trata de un concepto de estética temporal para crear tatuajes solares personalizados mediante adhesivos aplicados sobre la piel durante su exposición al sol. Estos adhesivos generan un contraste bronceado, que reproduce formas, símbolos o mensajes, logrando un tatuaje natural sin el uso de tinta y de carácter efímero.
55. Prendas de abrigo fuera del brazo. Hokway
La empresa ha patentado un sistema para transportar prendas como abrigos, chaquetas o sudaderas sin necesidad de llevarlas en la mano o sobre el brazo. El artilugio no altera la estética de la vestimenta y es compatible con cualquier prenda, con independencia de su tipo o tamaño, permitiendo sujetar la ropa de una forma flexible y cómoda. La solución se fabrica a nivel local y contribuye a un modelo más sostenible, reduciendo la huella logística y reforzando el compromiso de la startup con el entorno productivo cercano.
RSC Y VOLUNTARIADO
56. Responsabilidad social estratégica. Almar Consulting
Frente a modelos basados en acciones puntuales o donaciones, la compañía ha desarrollado un sistema de alianzas estables y proyectos de largo recorrido con fundaciones, instituciones deportivas, entidades sociales y educativas. Ejemplos de ello son su apoyo a la esquiadora Audrey Pascual, la creación del primer equipo femenino de parasurf, la iniciativa Limpia ríos, salva océanos junto a la Fundación Ecoalf, su implicación en la ONG Colabora Birmania y su patronazgo de la Fundación tuTECHO.
57. Tecnología para cambiar la visión del mundo. Save the Children
Cambiamos una palabra es una campaña basada en un experimento real con inteligencia artificial. Está protagonizada por un mismo niño haciendo la misma cosa, pero con un efecto muy distinto cuando cambia de país. Se centra en la capacidad de la inteligencia artificial para concienciar, dejando de ser únicamente un avance tecnológico para convertirse en un vehículo al servicio de la realidad y de la concienciación social.
58. Videointerpretación simultánea. CaixaBank
SVisual es un servicio de videointerpretación en lengua de signos para la atención financiera de las personas que padecen discapacidad auditiva. La entidad lo tiene en todas sus oficinas gratuitamente con sólo solicitar una cita al gestor y se realiza de forma simultánea. Se trata de una solución desarrollada por la Fundación CNSE para la supresión de las barreras de comunicación.
59. Reciclaje textil solidario. Ilunion Textilcare
Esta compañía ha lanzado una iniciativa de voluntariado corporativo en uno de sus espacios industriales, donde personas en vulnerabilidad pueden acercarse a lavar su ropa, acceder a servicios de higiene como duchas y escoger hasta cinco prendas en una tienda solidaria. Se lleva a cabo en colaboración con Mensajeros de la Paz y El Corte Inglés, y pretende generar dignidad e inclusión. También incorpora sesiones de orientación laboral.
60. Herramientas para entrevistas de trabajo. BeOne Medicines
En colaboración con la Fundación Quiero Trabajo, empleados de la empresa ofrecieron una jornada de orientación profesional a mujeres en situación de vulnerabilidad. Usando el formato speed mentoring, con conversaciones cortas pero significativas, facilitaron herramientas útiles para afrontar una entrevista de trabajo.
61. Emprendimiento femenino. Mastercard España-Aseme
MasterWomen es una iniciativa de apoyo ante las desigualdades y barreras que enfrentan las mujeres al emprender. En alianza con la Asociación Española de Mujeres Empresarias y con la colaboración de Cepyme, Mastercard reconoce a través de sus propios premios la perseverancia de las emprendedoras y que se conozcan como referentes valiosos.
62. Inclusión, bienestar y aprendizaje en la cocina. Fundación Cantabria Labs
Su proyecto Sopla que Quema, en colaboración con la Cofradía Gastronómica Zapico, convierte la cocina en un espacio de inclusión, aprendizaje y bienestar para personas mayores y con discapacidad. Son talleres semanales en grupos reducidos y en un entorno accesible, para fomentar la socialización, la estimulación sensorial y el desarrollo de habilidades para la vida diaria, adaptándose a las necesidades de cada participante.
63. Las mujeres cogen el volante. Solera
Women in Dealerships (WIND) es una iniciativa para transformar la automoción a través del fomento del liderazgo femenino. Se apoya en tres ejes: dar visibilidad a referentes femeninos del sector para motivar a nuevas generaciones, crear una comunidad en la que las profesionales compartan experiencias e impulsar el desarrollo profesional, a través de la formación, el liderazgo y el mentoring.
SALUD
64. Inteligencia artificial para reducir tiempos. Kiur Healthcare
Asistir en la toma de decisiones para acelerar la cura de heridas crónicas. Esta es la principal función de Advanced Cutaneous Evaluator, la aplicación móvil basada en inteligencia artificial de Kiur. Con sólo tomar una fotografía, realiza recomendaciones sobre tratamientos y mejora el tiempo de cura en un 35%.
65. Menos peso y más comodidad. ippi
El flotador de Kodiak para personas con limitaciones de movilidad es una asistencia con una doble ventaja: por un lado, se adapta a cualquier peso y altura gracias a su ajuste regulable en hombros y cintura y, además, facilita el trabajo de los asistentes de estas personas, evitando de este modo cargas pesadas.
66. Entornos de trabajo limpios y cómodos. Molins
En un contexto en el que el 80% de los edificios tiene más de 40 años y la reformas siguen aumentando cada día, crear entornos de trabajo limpios y cómodos es fundamental para garantizar la salud de los trabajadores. La exposición al polvo de los adhesivos cementosos es un riesgo constante para ojos y vías respiratorias y Molins ha encontrado una vía para reducirlo: Pam Ecogel, un producto que, sin perder adherencia y flexibilidad, reduce la exposición a estas partículas nocivas entre un 40 y un 53%.
67. Un hospital digital y 100% sostenible. Sanitas
El Hospital Blua Sanitas Valdebebas es el primer centro nativo digital de la compañía y uno de los proyectos sanitarios más innovadores de España. Abrió sus puertas el pasado mes de julio y en sus 10 plantas integra la asistencia presencial con herramientas tecnológicas avanzadas: inteligencia artificial, soluciones de domótica o voz en las habitaciones, entre otras. Además, funciona con energía 100% de origen renovable y opera sin emisiones de CO2 directas e indirectas.
68. Inversión en salud digital estratégica. CRB Health TecH
Esta firma privada de gestión de capital ha creado el primer fondo europeo de salud digital con base en España. Su nombre es CBR Digital Health III y está operativo en siete países, aunque entre el 40% y el 50% de la inversión se destinará a empresas españolas. Se marcó como objetivo inicial movilizar 20 millones de euros y ya ha llegado a los 50 millones.
69. Terapias dirigidas y menos invasivas. Novartis España
El cáncer de próstata es una de las principales causas de muerte en hombres mayores de 50 años. En Novartis han encontrado un nuevo tratamiento que brinda una nueva esperanza a los pacientes. Pluvicto es una terapia dirigida, con radioligandos, que actúa únicamente sobre las células tumorales. Se trata de una alternativa más eficaz que las que ya hay, menos invasiva y con muchos menos efectos secundarios.
70. Entrenar la mente para frenar impulsos. Sapientec Siglo XXI
Esta compañía ha aplicado su método de estimulación cognitiva al tratamiento de conductas adictivas entre los adolescentes. A través del entrenamiento mental, intenta fortalecer el control de los impulsos y la toma de decisiones críticas. Todo esto se consigue mediante ejercicios prácticos que dotan a los jóvenes de recursos que les ayuden a resistir a la presión social.
71. Ingeniería acústica y diseño óptico. EssilorLuxottica
Con seis altavoces integrados, sistemas de amplificación de sonido y procesamiento acústico para mejorar la comprensión de los diálogos, las gafas Nuance Audio son una de las soluciones más innovadoras creadas recientemente para personas con dificultades de audición. Abordan este problema con un complemento cotidiano y discreto como las gafas, que tienen la ventaja de poder adaptarse a necesidades visuales específicas mediante la incorporación de unas lentes graduadas.
72. Campos eléctricos que frenan el cáncer. Novocure
Algo más de 20 años después de sus primeros ensayos clínicos, Novocure consiguió el pasado agosto que el Sistema Nacional de Salud español incluyera TTFields como un tratamiento válido para pacientes con glioblastoma, el tumor más frecuente en el sistema nervioso. Los TTFields son campos eléctricos que se administran a través de un dispositivo portátil, con el propósito de interrumpir la división de células cancerosas. Es un gran avance para la oncología, ya que se trata de una terapia basada en principios físicos y no farmacológicos.
73. ¿Se puede medir el nivel de bienestar? Somos Fanes
El bienestar de una persona viene determinado por una serie de variables: el estado físico, el emocional, el social... Pero, ¿es posible medirlo? Esto es lo que se ha propuesto la asociación Somos Fanes con la creación del Observatorio del Bienestar Integral. En colaboración con profesionales de entidades como el Comité Olímpico Español (COE) o la Clínica Universidad de Navarra, el proyecto busca generar un conocimiento riguroso sobre este tema para ofrecer datos fiables que puedan orientar las decisiones y las políticas públicas relacionadas con el ámbito del bienestar.
74. Una transformación total a través del dato. Comunidad de Madrid
La región madrileña ha iniciado la transformación digital de su sistema sanitario. El objetivo es crear un entorno basado en la explotación avanzada del dato, facilitando su uso para los 35.000 profesionales de la salud, siempre siguiendo unos estrictos criterios de privacidad. Para ello, se ha creado Madrid-Health Data Space, un sistema que facilita el análisis masivo de grandes volúmenes de datos gracias al uso de agentes con capacidades avanzadas de inteligencia artificial, que permiten aumentar la capacidad predictiva y preventiva y la eficiencia operativa del conjunto del sistema.
75. Una residencia convertida en plató. Ballesol
Entre Amigos es un programa de entrevistas, como tantos otros a los que acuden invitados de la cultura, las artes o el deporte. Pero presenta una peculiaridad: no lo dirigen ni presentan conocidos periodistas, sino los habitantes de la residencia de mayores Ballesol Pozuelo, que son quienes se encargan de todo. Durante las semanas previas a la grabación, realizan talleres de preparación que les ayudan a mejorar la atención, la memoria, la concentración y, en definitiva, su bienestar general. Pero sobre todo, sirve para luchar contra uno de los grandes enemigos de las edades avanzadas: la soledad.
76. Asistencia precisa en tres dimensiones. B. Braun España-Cella
La cirugía oncológica busca afinar su precisión para ser lo menos invasiva posible y la tecnología es la mejor aliada para conseguirlo. Es por ello que B. Braun y Cella han introducido en esta rama de la medicina un avance clave: modelos tridimensionales personalizados de cada paciente que actúan como los gemelos digitales y que, gracias a un sistema de navegación y guiado, permiten llevar la precisión de las operaciones a otro nivel. Dicho de otro modo: una suerte de GPS quirúrgico.
77. Innovación social al servicio de la gente. Fundación Dignia
El Radar Compasivo de Fundación Dignia es una herramienta comunitaria diseñada por y para las personas. Lo humano gana relevancia frente a la tecnología, con el objetivo de detectar el sufrimiento invisible o las necesidades futuras. Primero, a través de las antenas primarias (hospitales y centros de salud). Y si es necesario, con las secundarias: comercios, parroquias o redes vecinales.
SOSTENIBILIDAD
78. Más agua para la región de Aragón. Amazon Web Services
Ha impulsado, con 17,2 millones de euros, cinco proyectos hídricos en Aragón que buscan la detección y reducción de pérdidas por fugas en tuberías, así como el aumento del caudal de agua reutilizada en granjas y un sistema de gestión de inundaciones. La lista sigue con el acceso de los agricultores a una solución de inteligencia artificial para maximizar el rendimiento de los cultivos y reducir su huella. También hay iniciativas para recuperar agua de escorrentía agrícola y regar un bosque de álamos o la modernización de una gran tubería en Huesca.
79. Mobiliario escolar a partir de bobinas. Ecoener
El proyecto Segunda vida en madera mejora el entorno escolar, gracias a la reutilización y valorización de materiales generados durante la construcción de las plantas fotovoltaicas de la empresa. Ecoener transforma bobinas de cable en mesas y sillas escolares, de lo que ya se han beneficiado varios centros en Colombia.
80. Polvo de basalto para fijar el CO2. LG España
La tecnológica ha lanzado el proyecto Smart Green Minerals con el Ayuntamiento de Ávila, la Universidad Católica de Ávila (UCAV) y la empresa Tremi. Usa la meteorización mejorada con polvo de basalto y vuelve zonas verdes urbanas en sumideros de carbono que fijan CO2. La meteorización es un proceso por el que, al llover, el agua arrastra moléculas de CO2, que entran en contacto con rocas, formando minerales sólidos que quedan atrapados en el suelo o los sedimentos. El dióxido de carbono se retira de la atmósfera y se almacena por mucho tiempo. Esto deriva en una tasa de absorción de media tonelada de CO2 por cada una de basalto.
81. Plataforma por el gas renovable. Gas verde, sí
Esta alianza reconoce la producción de gas verde con residuos orgánicos como solución energética, renovable, limpia, almacenable y capaz de colaborar en la descarbonización de los hogares, la industria y el transporte. Además, lo consigue mediante el aprovechamiento de las infraestructuras existentes.
82. Textiles fabricados a partir de residuos. Aquaservice
El proyecto Ecowear de economía circular de esta empresa de distribución de agua embotellada con dispensador transforma los residuos corporativos en textiles. La firma ofrece una segunda vida a uniformes de trabajo, lonas de camiones, soportes publicitarios o piezas descartadas de dispensadores. El proyecto ha recuperado ya más de 10.000 kilos de materiales, convirtiéndolos en mochilas o mobiliario exterior.
83. Gran banco genético de razas autóctonas. Real Sociedad Canina de España
El banco genético Wisdom Panel, impulsado por este organismo, es un proyecto pionero en Europa que contribuye a la conservación de las razas caninas autóctonas de España. La iniciativa contempla la recogida y el análisis de más de 800 muestras de ADN para obtener información científica rigurosa sobre la diversidad genética, la variabilidad poblacional y la salud de las razas. El objetivo es garantizar una cría responsable que garantice la conservación de esas poblaciones. Muchas de estas razas se encuentran en riesgo de diversidad genética y de desarrollo de males hereditarios por cruces no controlados y consanguinidad.
84. Por unos envases más sostenibles. Ecoembes
La solución digital CircularCheck permite a fabricantes, productores y distribuidores diseñar envases sostenibles. Con una combinación de diagnóstico y análisis predictivo, ayuda a mejorar el diseño y la reciclabilidad, optimizando su ciclo de vida. La iniciativa ofrece recomendaciones y simula mejoras, facilitando la toma de decisiones en procesos de I+D y la adaptación al marco regulatorio europeo 2030.
85. Maquinaria reacondicionada. GAM
Reviver by Gam es una planta de refabricación de maquinaria y un modelo industrial que transforma equipos al final de su vida útil en maquinaria complementaria. Ubicada en León, aplica procesos de refabricación, reacondicionamiento de componentes y reciclaje, reduciendo el uso de materiales y residuos.
86. Combustible sintético en La Robla. Reolum
Este proyecto integrado reúne cuatro instalaciones en una única ubicación: una planta de cogeneración de biomasa, un centro de captura de CO2, una planta de hidrógeno y otra de metanol verde. La antigua central térmica de carbón de la Robla (León) se transforma así en un gran centro de producción de combustible sintético, aprovechando residuos agrícolas orgánicos como la paja de maíz. La instalación aspira a crear más de 200 puestos de trabajo de calidad.
87. Bebidas fabricadas con energía verde. Heineken España
La compañía es la primera cervecera española que elabora todas sus cervezas, cider y tinto de verano con energía renovable eléctrica y térmica. La iniciativa atañe a marcas como Cruzcampo, Heineken, Amstel o Águila. Esto impulsa los objetivos globales de descarbonización de la empresa: alcanzar las cero emisiones netas en producción en 2030 y en toda la cadena en 2040.
88. Por la preservación del patrimonio. Homely Capital Group
Esta firma de inversión inmobiliaria, que controla toda la cadena de valor del negocio, está desarrollando un programa de rehabilitación que recupera edificios con valor arquitectónico o histórico. Ya acumula destacados trabajos en Menorca, Córdoba y Sevilla.
89. Ayuda en forma de excedentes. Too Good To Go
Su solución tecnológica Donations+ ayuda a conectar negocios de alimentación con entidades benéficas, facilitando la donación de excedentes de un modo más eficiente, trazable, transparente y alineado con los requisitos normativos. La solución, digitalizada desde el escaneado de los productos hasta la recogida, se integra en un software modular que ayuda al retail a la gestión integral de su excedente alimentario.
90. Bolsas de basura que no vuelan. Ventura Soluciones Técnicas
Esta compañía ha lanzado un dispositivo de sujeción antiviento, llamado FIXA1, que evita los problemas que surgen cuando el viento voltea las bolsas de basura de las papeleras. Se evita así el esparcimientos de los residuos por el suelo.
TURISMO Y MOVILIDAD
91. Un tercer carril para la seguridad del tren. Construcciones P. V. Trans
La implementación de un tercer carril central para reforzar las vías de balasto de la alta velocidad. Esta idea complementa a un sistema electromagnético de alta tracción y control para el guiado y máxima seguridad. Se trata de una innovación que estabiliza el guiado lateral, por lo que anula la degradación del balasto y el desgaste prematuro de las ruedas, contribuyendo a un nuevo paradigma de seguridad y rentabilidad en la alta velocidad ferroviaria
92. Unión de hoteles y proveedores locales. Barceló Hotel Group
La plataforma digital Barceló Experiences busca personalizar el turismo al convertir a los hoteles en hubs donde el cliente puede planificar su estancia con actividades en destino. Consiste en la integración del sistema de reservas de actividades con el del hotel. Es un modelo escalable que ayuda a enriquecer la oferta local y colabora con proveedores locales.
93. Alojamientos y dinamizadores. Asociación mentorDay
Transformar el rol de hotel y convertirlo en un agente del desarrollo económico local. Esa es la meta de Hotel Social+, un proyecto que activa la profesionalización de los emprendedores, genera nuevos negocios, mejora la cadena de suministro y crea experiencias únicas para los huéspedes.
94. De la pantalla al turismo rural. Asociación Red de Pueblos de Película
Poner en valor el legado de las zonas rurales. Eso persigue la iniciativa Pueblos de Película, que busca el desarrollo de los municipios conviertiéndolos en escenarios de series, películas y campañas publicitarias. El objetivo: construir una red nacional y desestacionalizar el modelo turístico.
95. Un parking pero muchas funciones. Telpark
El nuevo hub de movilidad de la madrileña Plaza del Carmen transforma la gestión del aparcamiento urbano. Cuenta con cuatro niveles y una arquitectura para integrar de forma eficiente distintos modos de transporte en un único punto. Combina un área específica para logística de última milla y un lavadero ecológico, así como 39 puntos de recarga eléctrica y espacios de carsharing, alquiler de vehículos y micromovilidad y plazas para motos, coches y bicis.
96. Un enchufe para cruceros. Endesa
Es el primer sistema de suministro eléctrico para cruceros diseñado en España. La tecnología On-shore Power Supply es un enchufe gigante que les permite conectarse a la red eléctrica terrestre cuando están atracados. Así apagan sus ruidosos motores auxiliares, ccon los que dan servicio de iluminación, cocina o refrigeración a bordo, reduciendo la contaminación acústica y del aire en las ciudades.
97. Cinturones para el cáncer de mama. Ford España
La incomodidad al usar el cinturón de seguridad a raíz de un cáncer de mama tiene solución. SupportBelt está diseñado para mejorar la movilidad y el confort. Es un accesorio de espuma suave y transpirable, con forma cóncava y que se ajusta al cinturón para reducir la presión en la zona del pecho. Tras el lanzamiento de esta iniciativa, Ford puso muestras gratuitas a disposición de la Asociación Española Cáncer de Mama Metastásico (AECMM).
98. Contra el 'hackeo' de los coches. Lazarus Technology
CarAlert es una solución para prevenir y responder a los riesgos digitales asociados a los vehículos conectados (15 millones en España). Esta capa de protección está orientada a cubrir riesgos como el secuestro digital del vehículo, el fraude sobre servicios asociados, la manipulación de sistemas o el acceso indebido a los distintos perfiles digitales vinculados al coche.
99. El ahorro energético como beneficio monetizable. Tribbu
Esta firma ha lanzado la primera solución de carpooling validada en España para generar certificados de ahorro energético. Su iniciativa mide, valida y transforma el impacto medioambiental de un coche compartido en beneficios económicos directos para usuarios, empresas y administraciones. Cada trayecto compartido genera un ahorro cuantificable que se puede integrar en el sistema oficial de certificados.
100. Manzanas sostenibles. Madrid Capital Mundial
Las preferencias de los peatones rigen el modelo de urbanización plasmado en los nuevos distritos urbanos de Berrocales y Valdecarros, al sureste de Madrid. Dentro de las manzanas se crea un espacio para residentes y viandantes, con tráfico monitorizado y el aparcamiento en superficie reducido a su mínima expresión. Eso reduce el asfalto, mejora la convivencia y fomenta el comercio local, con un mayor número de terrazas y zonas de descanso.
Por Redacción PortalPortuario @PortalPortuario Damen Shipyards Group firmó un contrato con el grupo turco Albayrak para la entrega de remolcadores La entrada Damen firma acuerdo con Albayrak Group para entregar dos remolcadores se publicó primero en PortalPortuario .